Within Majestic 12
Where Does the SOM 1 01 Manual Fit?
The alleged SOM1-01 operations manual belongs to a later MJ-12 document stream and should not be treated as evidence for the core papers by default.
On this page
- What SOM 1 01 is claimed to be
- How it differs from the core papers
- Why separate provenance matters
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
SOM1-01 is an alleged “Majestic-12 Group Special Operations Manual” dated 7 April 1954 and titled Extraterrestrial Entities and Technology, Recovery and Disposal. It describes procedures for securing crash sites, recovering unusual craft and biological remains, packaging material and disguising operations from public view. Yet it did not appear with the original MJ-12 papers of the 1980s. It surfaced separately in 1994, when UFO researcher Don Berliner received an anonymous roll of undeveloped 35 mm film containing photographs of the supposed manual.[Special Operations Manual]specialoperationsmanual.comSpecial Operations Manual SOM1-01 Overview & AuthenticationSpecial Operations ManualSOM1-01 Overview & Authentication - SOM1-01December 30, 2014…
That later and independent provenance is the central fact for judging where SOM1-01 fits. Whatever view one takes of the earlier MJ-12 papers, SOM1-01 cannot simply inherit their credibility. No paper original with an official chain of custody has been produced for independent examination, while disputes over its security markings, typography and apparent anachronisms remain unresolved. The most defensible approach is therefore to treat SOM1-01 as a separate authenticity problem rather than as confirmation of the core MJ-12 documents.[WikiDisc]wikidisc.orgWiki Disc Special Operations Manual (SOM1-01) | Wiki DiscWiki Disc Special Operations Manual (SOM1-01) | Wiki Disc
What SOM1-01 is claimed to be
The manual presents itself not as a policy memorandum for senior officials but as an operational handbook. Its cover carries the designations “SOM 1-01” and “TO 12D1-3-11-1”, describes the issuing body as the “Majestic-12 Group” and marks the contents “TOP SECRET/MAJIC EYES ONLY”. Internally, it gives instructions concerning site security, recovery and packaging of purported extraterrestrial technology, treatment of living and dead biological entities and identification of unidentified flying objects.[Google Groups]groups.google.comGroups÷HéíáHéå! MJ-12 Special Operations Manual. (1/3Google Groups÷HéíáHéå! MJ-12 Special Operations Manual. (1/3)July 19, 1998…
That format makes SOM1-01 unusually important within the later MJ-12 literature. The famous Eisenhower briefing papers principally tell a story about the supposed establishment and leadership of MJ-12; SOM1-01 instead depicts what such an organisation allegedly did in the field. If authentic, it would imply that recovery of anomalous craft and bodies had become sufficiently routine by the mid-1950s to require written procedures, classification tables, packing instructions and document controls. That is a much more expansive claim than the mere existence of a secret committee.
The document as circulated also contains a change-control page showing revisions extending beyond its stated April 1954 publication date. Advocates regard this as a realistic feature of a working government manual. Robert and Ryan Wood have argued that initials on the page can be matched to military personnel who lived at Kirtland Air Force Base during the relevant period, and they point to a stamp referring to “Unit KB-88, BLDG. 21, Kirtland AFB” as another period-specific detail.[Special Operations Manual]specialoperationsmanual.comSpecial Operations Manual SourceSpecial Operations ManualSource - SOM1-01…
Those details can make a fabricated document look historically convincing, however, without establishing where the photographed original came from. Demonstrating that a named building existed, that plausible personnel had matching initials or that a period abbreviation was used correctly is evidence about consistency. It is not the same thing as establishing provenance.
How it differs from the core papers
SOM1-01 entered the record roughly a decade after the first celebrated MJ-12 material. Stanton Friedman identified the Eisenhower Briefing Document, Truman-Forrestal memorandum and Cutler-Twining memorandum as the original documents around which his MJ-12 case was built. His own writings also recognised that numerous later purported MJ-12 papers had appeared and that some were fraudulent.[The Black Vault]theblackvault.comThe Black Vault Update on Operation Majestic 12 DocumentsThe Black VaultUpdate on Operation Majestic 12 Documents - The Black Vault Case Files…
SOM1-01 belongs to that later stream. According to accounts from Berliner and its defenders, the film arrived anonymously in Wisconsin-sourced post in March 1994. The package contained no identifiable government cover letter, archival reference or verifiable account of who had possessed the alleged paper manual. The surviving evidential object is therefore the photographic record rather than a document recovered from government files.[Special Operations Manual]specialoperationsmanual.comSpecial Operations Manual SOM1-01 Overview & AuthenticationSpecial Operations ManualSOM1-01 Overview & Authentication - SOM1-01December 30, 2014…
This distinction is easy to lose because the SOM1-01 text deliberately occupies the same fictional or historical universe as the wider MJ-12 corpus. It uses the Majestic designation, depicts a secret recovery programme and incorporates terminology that appears compatible with the earlier narrative. Yet thematic consistency cannot establish common authorship or common provenance.
The arrival method is itself noteworthy. The original Eisenhower briefing material had also entered UFO research through anonymously supplied film rather than through a traceable government declassification process. With SOM1-01, another anonymous roll reached an established UFO researcher years later. That resemblance admits two opposite interpretations: proponents can regard anonymous photography as a plausible method for an insider leaking documents that could not safely be removed, while critics can regard repetition of the same unverifiable delivery mechanism as exactly what a knowledgeable fabricator would choose.[WikiDisc]wikidisc.orgWiki Disc Special Operations Manual (SOM1-01) | Wiki DiscWiki Disc Special Operations Manual (SOM1-01) | Wiki Disc
The critical point is that neither interpretation supplies the missing chain of custody. Even if another MJ-12 document were someday authenticated, that would not show that the photographed SOM1-01 manual had existed in government service in 1954.
The strongest authenticity dispute is provenance
Supporters have traced the 1994 mailing more closely than the phrase “anonymous package” might suggest. Robert Wood says the postage meter identified Quillin’s Drugs in La Crosse, Wisconsin, and investigators interviewed people associated with the business. Advocates have also reported second-hand claims that a researcher encountered an old paper copy of the manual before the 1994 mailing.[Special Operations Manual]specialoperationsmanual.comSpecial Operations Manual SOM1-01 Overview & AuthenticationSpecial Operations ManualSOM1-01 Overview & Authentication - SOM1-01December 30, 2014…
These investigations potentially establish where the film entered the postal system. They do not establish who created the photographed pages. A provenance chain capable of authenticating SOM1-01 would ideally connect the document backwards from Berliner to an identifiable government custodian, office, records series or authorised printing operation. The currently public chain ends at an anonymous mailing.
This matters because no original paper manual is available for the familiar physical tests used in questioned-document work. Paper fibres, watermarks, ink composition, ageing, binding, impressions and other material characteristics could help determine whether an artefact was actually manufactured in the 1950s. Photographs can preserve typography and layout, but they cannot provide the same evidence about the physical object. A summary of the SOM1-01 controversy notes that Friedman himself acknowledged the difficulty created by receiving the document on film rather than as an examinable original.[WikiDisc]wikidisc.orgWiki Disc Special Operations Manual (SOM1-01) | Wiki DiscWiki Disc Special Operations Manual (SOM1-01) | Wiki Disc
Advocates have pointed out that the Tri-X film itself was reportedly manufactured in 1954. Even accepting that claim, the date of unused photographic film would not demonstrate the date on which it was exposed. Old film can survive for decades, so the film stock is at most circumstantial evidence unless its custody and exposure history can independently be established. The same evidential distinction applies to historically accurate vocabulary, addresses or printing conventions: a genuine period feature establishes that the creator knew or possessed something period-appropriate, not necessarily that the completed manual originated in that period.[Special Operations Manual]specialoperationsmanual.comSpecial Operations Manual SOM1-01 Overview & AuthenticationSpecial Operations ManualSOM1-01 Overview & Authentication - SOM1-01December 30, 2014…
Period details cut both ways
Much of the SOM1-01 debate has therefore shifted from physical authentication to whether the manual looks and reads like a document that could have been made in the mid-1950s.
Robert and Ryan Wood argue that its main type resembles Monotype Modern and that its layout, letter spacing and other production characteristics are consistent with hot-metal government printing. One repeatedly cited feature is a slightly raised letter “z”, which they attribute to mechanical contamination in a hot-metal typesetting process. They also reject claims that the sans-serif headings must be Helvetica, arguing that older typefaces including Franklin Gothic or Square Gothic provide sufficiently close matches.[Special Operations Manual]specialoperationsmanual.comSpecial Operations Manual Why The Critics Are Wrong About SOM1-01Special Operations ManualWhy The Critics Are Wrong About SOM1-01 - SOM1-01…
The typography dispute illustrates why dating from appearance alone is difficult. Helvetica itself was created only in 1957, making a conclusive Helvetica identification fatal to a document supposedly produced in 1954. But Franklin Gothic originated decades earlier, so a sufficiently close match to that family removes the simple anachronism. Independent typography histories confirm that Franklin Gothic originated in the early twentieth century and therefore was available well before 1954.[MyFonts]myfonts.comMy Fonts Franklin Gothic/CharterFranklin Gothic/Charter - Fonts.com | Fonts.com…
That does not authenticate SOM1-01. It narrows the dispute from “this typeface could not have existed” to the harder forensic question of exactly which face and printing process produced the photographed letters. Because researchers are examining images rather than the supposed printing itself, confident claims on either side should be treated cautiously unless supported by high-quality comparative specimens and independent specialist analysis.
Other features have provoked similar argument. Critics have questioned the manual’s references to telling witnesses that debris could be from a “downed satellite”, because no artificial satellite reached orbit until Sputnik 1 in 1957, and have challenged apparent references associated with Area 51 and the ability of 1950s radar to infer object shape. Defenders answer that artificial satellites were publicly discussed before the first launch, that descriptions of secret locations need not follow their later popular names exactly and that some radar observations could permit estimates of size.[Special Operations Manual]specialoperationsmanual.comSpecial Operations Manual
These are useful checks for possible anachronisms, but they are individually less decisive than provenance. A phrase can have an obscure period precedent; an installation can exist before its familiar name; a technical capability can be misunderstood by either critic or defender. A secure chain of custody would outweigh many such stylistic puzzles. SOM1-01 has no comparable documentary chain.
The “Restricted” marking presents a concrete problem
One criticism can be tied directly to contemporary US classification policy. SOM1-01 places “RESTRICTED” on its cover alongside the much higher “TOP SECRET/MAJIC EYES ONLY” designation. Yet President Eisenhower’s Executive Order 10501, issued in November 1953 and effective from 15 December that year, limited national-defence classifications to Top Secret, Secret and Confidential. Government records explicitly state that the order eliminated the former “Restricted” classification. SOM1-01 is dated April 1954, several months after that change.[The American Presidency Project]presidency.ucsb.eduOpen source on ucsb.edu.
This is stronger than simply observing that the document looks unusual. It establishes that “Restricted” was no longer an authorised classification category under the executive order governing defence information at the date claimed by the manual.
Defenders respond that the cover need not be using “Restricted” as a formal classification. In ordinary language, it could instead be an access warning — effectively, “distribution restricted” — while “Top Secret” remained the actual classification. They also point to period documents in which variations of the word appear near higher security markings.[Special Operations Manual]specialoperationsmanual.comSpecial Operations Manual SOM1-01 Overview & AuthenticationSpecial Operations ManualSOM1-01 Overview & Authentication - SOM1-01December 30, 2014…
That rebuttal prevents the word alone from serving as a simple proof of fabrication, but it shifts the question to document practice. If “Restricted” was merely an administrative caveat, the relevant comparison is not whether the word existed in English but whether genuine manuals of the same issuing system used it in the same position, typography and meaning. No securely sourced MJ-12 office records exist against which that alleged internal convention can be tested.
A convincing format is not a government record
The designation “TO 12D1-3-11-1” is intended to resemble an Air Force Technical Order number. Technical Orders are a genuine system used to manage instructions and technical data for Air Force equipment and procedures; modern Air Force guidance describes a structured numbering system and a formal catalogue for such publications.[tinker.af.mil]tinker.af.milAFD 151008 029AFD 151008 029
For SOM1-01, however, resemblance to a Technical Order is not the same as locating the supposed order in an official index or records series. Early critics specifically raised the unexplained TO number as something that should be checked against period Air Force indexes.[Biblioteca Pleyades]bibliotecapleyades.netBiblioteca Pleyades SOM1-01Biblioteca Pleyades SOM1-01
The same reasoning applies to the manual’s tables, change sheet, page numbering, security warnings and government-like prose. These details matter because a careless hoax might expose itself through a convention that did not yet exist. Conversely, getting them right only shows that the creator had access to suitable reference material or authentic-looking examples.
This distinction is particularly important for a document that appeared in 1994. By then, researchers, collectors and archives already held large quantities of 1940s and 1950s US military paperwork that could supply models for typography, classification language and document architecture. An authenticity argument therefore needs evidence that would have been difficult for a modern creator to obtain or reproduce, not merely features that resemble period documents.
Why separate provenance matters
The right question is not whether SOM1-01 “feels like” an MJ-12 document. It is whether evidence links this particular manual to the US government in the 1950s.
At present, three different propositions are often allowed to blur together:
- The manual contains period-consistent details. Some clearly are consistent, and defenders have successfully challenged several simplistic claims of anachronism.
- The photographed physical object may have been produced using historically appropriate printing methods. Advocates argue strongly for this, but the absence of the original limits independent physical verification.
- The manual was an authentic Majestic-12 government publication. This is the much larger claim, and it requires provenance or independent official corroboration that the first two propositions do not supply.
That hierarchy explains why the SOM1-01 debate cannot be settled merely by accumulating correct details. A skilled forgery can be historically sophisticated. Conversely, an authentic secret document could contain idiosyncratic formatting. Provenance is what normally connects appearance to institutional origin.
The anonymous 1994 film therefore remains the central evidential weakness. Identifying the postal meter, finding a real Kirtland building or matching initials to real officers may increase the historical texture surrounding the manual, but none bridges the gap between the photographed pages and a documented government custodian.[Special Operations Manual]specialoperationsmanual.comSpecial Operations Manual SourceSpecial Operations ManualSource - SOM1-01…
Where does the SOM1-01 manual fit?
Within the alleged MJ-12 document story, SOM1-01 is best treated as a later, independently sourced case family. It substantially expands the narrative by depicting a mature crash-recovery bureaucracy, but it arrived through a different evidential route from the principal papers that launched the MJ-12 controversy.
There are genuine points worth investigating rather than dismissing out of hand. Some supposed typographic anachronisms are less clear-cut than early critics claimed; several formatting and geographical details appear compatible with the 1950s; and defenders have undertaken detailed attempts to trace names, buildings, postal evidence and printing practices.[Majestic Documents]majesticdocuments.comOpen source on majesticdocuments.com.
Against that stands a more fundamental problem: no authenticated government original has emerged. The document appeared anonymously in photographic form in 1994, its pre-1994 custody is unverified, ordinary physical-document testing is unavailable, and at least some features — particularly the handling of “Restricted” after Executive Order 10501 — warrant serious scrutiny.[WikiDisc]wikidisc.orgWiki Disc Special Operations Manual (SOM1-01) | Wiki DiscWiki Disc Special Operations Manual (SOM1-01) | Wiki Disc
The consequence for the broader MJ-12 question is straightforward. SOM1-01 should neither be used automatically to corroborate the earlier MJ-12 papers nor be allowed automatically to discredit them. Its authenticity has to stand or fall on its own evidence. Until a verifiable pre-1994 original, official archival counterpart or comparably strong chain of custody appears, SOM1-01 remains an interesting but unverified addition to the alleged MJ-12 corpus rather than independent proof of it.
Amazon book picks
Further Reading
Books and field guides related to Where Does the SOM 1 01 Manual Fit?. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.
The Demon-haunted World
Rating: 4.5/5 from 43 Google Books ratings
Are we on the brink of a new Dark Age of irrationality and superstition? In this book, the writer shows how scientific thinking is necess...
The UFO Encyclopedia
"A comprehensive encyclopedia that describes the UFO phenomenon from the beginning and offers the first calibrated scientific proof for t...
The UFO Experience: A Scientific Inquiry
Cited by the New York Review of Books as "the best brief for visitation," this classic study presents an analysis of UFO reports and conc...
UFOs and Government: A Historical Inquiry
Governments around the world have had to deal with the UFO phenomenon for a good part of a century. How and why they did so is the subjec...
eBay marketplace picks
Marketplace Samples
Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.
Selected fromUFO poster oneBay.co.uk.
Endnotes
1.
Source: wikidisc.org
Title: Wiki Disc Special Operations Manual (SOM1-01) | Wiki Disc
Link:https://www.wikidisc.org/wiki/Special_Operations_Manual_%28SOM1-01%29
2.
Source: groups.google.com
Title: Groups÷HéíáHéå! MJ-12 Special Operations Manual. (1/3)
Link:https://groups.google.com/g/fido7.ru.ufo/c/0328gcCKW5g/m/hmfo6qr-ePYJ
Source snippet
Google Groups÷HéíáHéå! MJ-12 Special Operations Manual. (1/3)July 19, 1998...
Published: July 19, 1998
3.
Source: myfonts.com
Title: My Fonts Franklin Gothic/Charter
Link:https://www.myfonts.com/pages/fontscom-learning-fyti-typographic-reference-franklin-gothic-charter/
Source snippet
Franklin Gothic/Charter - Fonts.com | Fonts.com...
4.
Source: archives.gov
Title: National Archives TRANSFORMING
Link:https://www.archives.gov/files/declassification/pidb/recommendations/transforming-classification.pdf
5.
Source: tinker.af.mil
Title: AFD 151008 029
Link:https://www.tinker.af.mil/Portals/106/documents/AFD-151008-029.PDF
6.
Source: tinker.af.mil
Title: T O 00-5-1
Link:https://www.tinker.af.mil/Portals/106/Documents/Technical%20Orders/AFD%20030419%2000-5-1_locked.pdf
Source snippet
TECHNICAL MANUAL AF TECHNICAL ORDER SYST...
7.
Source: wikidisc.org
Title: Majestic 12 documents | Wiki Disc
Link:https://www.wikidisc.org/wiki/Majestic_12_documents
8.
Source: archives.gov
Title: e o 13526 and 32 cfr part 2001
Link:https://www.archives.gov/isoo/faqs/e-o-13526-and-32-cfr-part-2001
9.
Source: archives.gov
Link:https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/codification/executive-orders-10.html
10.
Source: archives.gov
Title: Executive Orders Disposition Tables | National Archives
Link:https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/executive-orders/1951.html
11.
Source: archives.gov
Title: Executive Orders Disposition Tables | National Archives
Link:https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/executive-orders/1953-truman.html
12.
Source: archives.gov
Title: Executive Orders Disposition Tables | National Archives
Link:https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/executive-orders/1954.html
13.
Source: archives.gov
Title: Executive Orders Disposition Tables | National Archives
Link:https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/executive-orders/1959.html
14.
Source: groups.google.com
Title: Kms l8Ayw Qw
Link:https://groups.google.com/g/alt.paranet.ufo/c/Kms-l8AywQw
15.
Source: archives.gov
Title: Executive Orders | National Archives
Link:https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/codification/executive-order/12356.html
16.
Source: myfonts.com
Link:https://www.myfonts.com/collections/franklin-gothic-font-linotype
17.
Source: archives.gov
Title: Executive Orders | National Archives
Link:https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/codification/executive-order/10450.html
18.
Source: specialoperationsmanual.com
Title: Special Operations Manual SOM1-01 Overview & Authentication
Link:https://www.specialoperationsmanual.com/2014/12/30/som1-01-overview-authentication/
Source snippet
Special Operations ManualSOM1-01 Overview & Authentication - SOM1-01December 30, 2014...
Published: December 30, 2014
19.
Source: theblackvault.com
Title: The Black Vault Update on Operation Majestic 12 Documents
Link:https://www.theblackvault.com/casefiles/update-on-operation-majestic-12-documents/
Source snippet
The Black VaultUpdate on Operation Majestic 12 Documents - The Black Vault Case Files...
20.
Source: specialoperationsmanual.com
Title: Special Operations Manual The Manual
Link:https://www.specialoperationsmanual.com/the-manual/
Source snippet
Special Operations ManualThe Manual - SOM1-01...
21.
Source: specialoperationsmanual.com
Title: Special Operations Manual Source
Link:https://www.specialoperationsmanual.com/source/
Source snippet
Special Operations ManualSource - SOM1-01...
22.
Source: specialoperationsmanual.com
Title: Special Operations Manual Why The Critics Are Wrong About SOM1-01
Link:https://www.specialoperationsmanual.com/2014/12/28/why-the-critics-are-wrong-about-som1-01-mufon-journal-jan-2015/
Source snippet
Special Operations ManualWhy The Critics Are Wrong About SOM1-01 - SOM1-01...
23.
Source: majesticdocuments.com
Link:https://www.majesticdocuments.com/pdf/rmwood_mufon2001.pdf
24.
Source: specialoperationsmanual.com
Title: Special Operations Manual
Link:https://www.specialoperationsmanual.com/2014/12/28/summary-skeptic-objections-to-authenticity/
25.
Source: specialoperationsmanual.com
Title: Special Operations Manual FAQ
Link:https://www.specialoperationsmanual.com/faq/
26.
Source: presidency.ucsb.edu
Link:https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/executive-order-10501-safeguarding-official-information-the-interests-the-defense-the
27.
Source: bibliotecapleyades.net
Title: Biblioteca Pleyades SOM1-01
Link:https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/sociopol_som1-01.htm
28.
Source: theblackvault.com
Title: FB I Files: The Paranormal Collection
Link:https://www.theblackvault.com/documentarchive/fbi-files-the-paranormal-collection/
29.
Source: theblackvault.com
Title: The UFO “WHY?” Questions
Link:https://www.theblackvault.com/casefiles/the-ufo-why-questions/
30.
Source: theblackvault.com
Title: Government UFO Lies
Link:https://www.theblackvault.com/casefiles/government-ufo-lies/
31.
Source: theblackvault.com
Title: Debunkers At It Again
Link:https://www.theblackvault.com/casefiles/debunkers-at-it-again/
32.
Source: theblackvault.com
Link:https://www.theblackvault.com/casefiles/tag/mj12/
33.
Source: theblackvault.com
Title: My Letter to the New York Times
Link:https://www.theblackvault.com/casefiles/my-letter-to-the-new-york-times/
34.
Source: theblackvault.com
Title: Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Files on [Stanton Friedman]({{ ‘friedman-s-case/’ | relative_url }})
Link:https://www.theblackvault.com/documentarchive/federal-bureau-of-investigation-fbi-files-on-stanton-friedman/
35.
Source: theblackvault.com
Title: ufos today by stanton t friedman august 1972
Link:https://www.theblackvault.com/casefiles/ufos-today-by-stanton-t-friedman-august-1972/
Published: august 1972
36.
Source: majesticdocuments.com
Title: documents dated 1948 1959
Link:https://majesticdocuments.com/documents/majestic-documents/documents-dated-1948-1959/
37.
Source: majesticdocuments.com
Title: Documents | Majestic Documents
Link:https://majesticdocuments.com/documents/
38.
Source: theblackvault.com
Title: The Black Vault Radio – Show Notes & Episode Breakdowns
Link:https://www.theblackvault.com/documentarchive/the-black-vault-radio-show-notes-episode-breakdown/
39.
Source: theblackvault.com
Title: new majestic 12 mj 12 briefing documents released june 2017
Link:https://www.theblackvault.com/casefiles/new-majestic-12-mj-12-briefing-documents-released-june-2017/
Published: june 2017
40.
Source: theblackvault.com
Title: cias role in the study of ufos 1947 90
Link:https://www.theblackvault.com/documentarchive/cias-role-in-the-study-of-ufos-1947-90/
41.
Source: bibliotecapleyades.net
Title: The Covert World of UFO Crash Retrievals
Link:https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/exopolitica/esp_exopolitics_ZZZZJ.htm
42.
Source: specialoperationsmanual.com
Title: SO M1-01
Link:https://www.specialoperationsmanual.com/
43.
Source: designstylebook.com
Title: franklin gothic
Link:https://www.designstylebook.com/typography/franklin-gothic
44.
Source: typography.fandom.com
Title: Franklin Gothic
Link:https://typography.fandom.com/wiki/Franklin_Gothic
45.
Source: scribd.com
Title: SO M1-01
Link:https://www.scribd.com/document/338470326/SOM1-01-Special-Operations-Manual-E
46.
Source: scribd.com
Link:https://www.scribd.com/document/346323384/majestic12-1
47.
Source: bibliotecapleyades.net
Title: operations manual
Link:https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/serpo/operations_manual.htm
48.
Source: col2.com
Title: operation majestic 12
Link:https://col2.com/operation-majestic-12
49.
Source: presidency.ucsb.edu
Link:https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/executive-order-10964-amendment-executive-order-10501-safeguarding-official-information
50.
Source: presidency.ucsb.edu
Link:https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/executive-order-10901-amendment-executive-order-10501-relating-safeguarding-official
51.
Source: presidency.ucsb.edu
Link:https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/executive-order-10816-amendment-executive-order-no-10501-november-5-1953-relating
52.
Source: scribd.com
Title: SOM1 01
Link:https://www.scribd.com/document/826001136/SOM1-01
53.
Source: disclosdex.com
Title: Majestic 12 | Disclosdex
Link:https://disclosdex.com/organizations/majestic-12
Additional References
54.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Top Secret UFO Manual (SOM1-01) | Military Whistleblowers Speak Out
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LdvVNDKh208
Source snippet
Ep 021: A Full Reading of the MJ-12 Special Operations Manual SOM1-01...
55.
Source: youtube.com
Title: The Majestic-12 Documents [With Ryan S. Wood]
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vzB87RJkQVU
Source snippet
SOM1-01 manual Majestic 12 Ep 021: A Full Reading of the MJ-12 Special Operations Manual SOM1-01...
56.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Ep 021: A Full Reading of the MJ-12 Special Operations Manual SOM1-01
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6gXZLebZolU
Source snippet
The Majestic-12 Documents [With Ryan S. Wood]...
57.
Source: andrewvtran.com
Link:https://andrewvtran.com/Franklin-Gothic
58.
Source: jesuschristflatearth.com
Link:https://jesuschristflatearth.com/one-thousand-secrets-in-the-world/
59.
Source: scribd.com
Link:https://www.scribd.com/document/829631730/SOM1-01-original-complete
60.
Source: col2.com
Link:https://col2.com/el-sistema-de-clasificacion-extraterrestre-en-el-manual-som1-01-del-mj-12
61.
Source: hangar1publishing.com
Link:https://hangar1publishing.com/blogs/ufos-uaps-and-aliens/stanton-friedman
62.
Source: zuerich.com
Link:https://www.zuerich.com/en/art-culture/zurich-avantgarde/swiss-graphics-typography
63.
Source: col2.com
Link:https://col2.com/the-extraterrestrial-classification-system-in-the-majestic-12-som1-01-manual