Could Forrestal Have Run MJ 12 in September 1947?

Introduction

James Forrestal had been Secretary of Defense for only seven days when, according to the alleged MJ-12 papers, President Harry S. Truman authorised him on 24 September 1947 to proceed with an undertaking henceforth called “Operation Majestic Twelve”. The timing is one of the story’s more convincing period details. Forrestal really had become the first US Secretary of Defense on 17 September, and his installation had been accelerated on Truman’s orders as the new National Military Establishment began operating.[Defense History]history.defense.govHistory James V. Forrestal > Historical Office > Article ViewDefense HistoryJames V. Forrestal > Historical Office > Article View…

That historical fit matters, but it has limits. Forrestal was the logical new civilian official to place above a sensitive military programme spanning several services. Yet his office in September 1947 was considerably weaker and less developed than the modern Secretary of Defense. The alleged memorandum therefore gives him a plausible coordinating position, while supplementing that position with direct presidential authority. That distinction helps explain why the document can sound institutionally credible without providing evidence that MJ-12 actually existed.

Forrestal had been in office for just one week

Forrestal’s title was genuinely new. Truman had signed the National Security Act on 26 July 1947, creating a National Military Establishment that brought the Army, Navy and newly independent Air Force into a common national-security structure under a civilian Secretary of Defense. Forrestal, previously Secretary of the Navy, became the first person to occupy the post.[U.S. Department of War]war.govOpen source on war.gov.(https://www.war.gov/Multimedia/Experience/Historic-Highlights-From-the-Department-of-War/)

Even his starting date reflected the unsettled conditions of the period. Forrestal’s swearing-in had originally been planned for 22 September, but Truman ordered it brought forward to 17 September because of concern that Yugoslavia might make a move against Trieste, where American and British forces were stationed. The Defense Department’s official history describes Forrestal’s oath-taking as the first step in putting the machinery authorised by Congress into operation.[Defense History]history.defense.govTHE FORMATIVE YEARS 1947-1950 Problems abroad thSeptember 22, 2009…Published: September 22, 2009

That creates an unusually tight chronology around the alleged MJ-12 directive:

For the alleged document’s narrative, Forrestal is therefore not simply a famous defence official inserted retrospectively into the story. He occupies precisely the office that had just been created to coordinate the country’s formerly separate military departments. That makes the choice of recipient historically well judged.

There is an important qualification, however. The novelty of Forrestal’s position cuts both ways. In September 1947 he was not sitting atop a mature Pentagon bureaucracy with decades of established authority and procedures behind it. An official Defense Department organisational history describes his starting circumstances starkly: Forrestal initially had no established office, staff, organisation chart, procedural manual, dedicated funds or detailed administrative plan. He gradually built the Office of the Secretary of Defense around three special assistants.[Defense History]history.defense.govHistory The Department of DefenseDefense HistoryThe Department of DefenseAugust 20, 2009…Published: August 20, 2009

What authority does the alleged memorandum give Forrestal?

The disputed 24 September memorandum is remarkably short. Addressed to “Secretary Forrestal”, it refers to a “recent conversation”, authorises him to proceed with “all due speed and caution” on an unspecified undertaking, and declares that the matter is thereafter to be called “Operation Majestic Twelve”.[Wikisource]en.wikisource.orgMJ-12 DocumentMJ-12 Document - Wikisource, the free online libraryNovember 18, 1952…Published: November 18, 1952

Its governance structure is more revealing than its famous code name. The supposed directive does not make Forrestal the ultimate owner of the matter. Instead, it says that questions concerning its eventual disposition should remain with the Office of the President, following discussions with Forrestal, Vannevar Bush and the Director of Central Intelligence. In other words, the document depicts Forrestal as the senior executive charged with proceeding, but Truman as retaining final political control.[Wikisource]en.wikisource.orgMJ-12 DocumentMJ-12 Document - Wikisource, the free online libraryNovember 18, 1952…Published: November 18, 1952

That is a significant distinction when assessing the document on its own terms. The alleged memorandum appears to establish two levels of authority: operational responsibility centred on Forrestal, and ultimate disposition reserved to the presidency. Bush and the intelligence director appear as high-level participants in consultation rather than as replacements for Forrestal’s defence role.

This arrangement also helps explain why Forrestal’s new title matters to the MJ-12 narrative. A programme supposedly requiring access to military recovery operations, intelligence, scientific expertise and highly restricted information would create an obvious inter-service problem. Assigning responsibility to the newly installed Secretary of Defense gives the story a single civilian official above the Army, Navy and Air Force rather than requiring one service to control the others.

But that apparent logic should not be confused with evidence. The text is evidence only for what the alleged memorandum claims Truman authorised, not proof that Forrestal ever received or acted upon such instructions.

Forrestal’s real powers were narrower than the story can imply

There is a further complication that is easy to miss when the 1947 office is viewed through the lens of today’s Department of Defense. Forrestal’s original statutory authority was deliberately limited. The National Security Act created a coordinating structure while preserving separately administered military departments. Forrestal’s later experience convinced him that the Secretary of Defense needed considerably stronger powers.[Defense History]history.defense.govHistory James V. Forrestal > Historical Office > Article ViewDefense HistoryJames V. Forrestal > Historical Office > Article View…

The Defense Department’s historical account records that Forrestal eventually recommended removing the qualifying word “general” from the Secretary’s responsibility for exercising direction, authority and control over the National Military Establishment. He also sought an under-secretary and clearer authority over personnel and the services. Those recommendations contributed to the stronger structure enacted in 1949.[Defense History]history.defense.govHistory James V. Forrestal > Historical Office > Article ViewDefense HistoryJames V. Forrestal > Historical Office > Article View…

This changes how the alleged MJ-12 memorandum should be read. If Forrestal really had been asked in September 1947 to oversee an exceptionally sensitive activity extending across military organisations, his title alone would not necessarily have supplied all the specific authority required. A direct presidential instruction would have been especially useful for cutting through the ambiguities of a new and relatively weak defence office.

In that narrow sense, the disputed memorandum is internally clever: it does not merely rely on Forrestal’s statutory title. It purports to add Truman’s personal authorisation. The instruction to proceed could therefore be read as presidential authority layered on top of Forrestal’s newly created coordinating position.

That feature strengthens the document’s period fit, but not its provenance. Indeed, the distinction is crucial: a document can reflect real bureaucratic tensions of 1947 and still be fabricated by someone familiar with those tensions.

Why Forrestal fits the alleged chain of command so well

The most striking feature of the Forrestal choice is that several genuine developments converge around him during the exact week assigned to MJ-12’s supposed creation.

First, the National Military Establishment had only just begun functioning under his leadership. Second, Truman had personally accelerated Forrestal’s assumption of office because an international crisis made immediate central defence leadership desirable. Third, Forrestal was already deeply experienced in military administration from his years as Secretary of the Navy. Fourth, the authentic presidential diary puts Forrestal and Vannevar Bush together with Truman on 24 September itself.[Defense History]history.defense.govTHE FORMATIVE YEARS 1947-1950 Problems abroad thSeptember 22, 2009…Published: September 22, 2009

For a reader encountering the alleged papers, those facts make the scenario unusually easy to imagine. Forrestal was neither an implausible outsider nor someone whose later career had simply been projected backwards. He was a central participant in the very reorganisation that was reshaping American military governance in September 1947.

The same evidence, however, permits a less favourable interpretation of the MJ-12 documents. These were discoverable historical facts capable of supplying a fabricated document with convincing period texture. Forrestal’s appointment, his relationship with Truman and the creation of his office were not secret facts known only to an MJ-12 insider.

The 24 September presidential appointment is more intriguing because it matches both Forrestal and Bush, but even this establishes only that the three men met. Truman’s diary records the appointment; it does not identify Majestic Twelve, Roswell, recovered spacecraft or any comparable subject.[Harry S. Truman Presidential Library]trumanlibrary.govOpen source on trumanlibrary.gov. The meeting therefore supports chronological plausibility, not the alleged memorandum’s extraordinary content.

The missing institutional trail is the larger problem

If the alleged memorandum were authentic, Forrestal’s role ought to be considered not merely as a name on a presidential note but as the head of a continuing secret undertaking. That raises a governance question: what documentary traces would a programme of the scale described in the wider MJ-12 papers be expected to leave?

Federal searches have not supplied the necessary corroboration. The National Archives reports extensive searches of Air Force and Joint Chiefs of Staff holdings for MJ-12 material, while the Truman and Eisenhower presidential libraries also searched their holdings for references or copies. Searches of records associated with the Secretary of Defense, Joint Chiefs, Air Force and related organisations produced no further documentation establishing the supposed organisation.[National Archives]archives.govNational Archives Project BLUE BOOKNational Archives Project BLUE BOOK

The US Government Accountability Office reached the same broader problem in 1995. After asking relevant federal agencies about the circulated Majestic 12 material, the GAO reported that there was no evidence that it consisted of actual executive-branch documents. Federal archivists had found neither material fitting the claimed organisation nor independent references corroborating it.[Government Accountability Office]gao.govOpen source on gao.gov.

The FBI’s account is still more categorical about the MJ-12 material it investigated. When versions of the supposed Eisenhower briefing reached FBI offices in 1988, an Air Force investigation determined the document to be fake; the FBI now describes the Majestic-12 document accordingly in its public Vault catalogue.[FBI]vault.fbi.gov— Federal Bureau of Investigation— Federal Bureau of Investigation

Those findings matter particularly for Forrestal. His authentic career produced an extensive governmental record precisely because he was constructing and administering a new national-security institution. The absence of an independently authenticated Forrestal-era paper trail for MJ-12 therefore cannot be overcome merely by observing that he would have been a sensible person to put in charge.

Period fit is not proof of Forrestal’s MJ-12 role

The Forrestal element is one of the alleged MJ-12 story’s strongest pieces of historical staging. On 24 September 1947, he really was the brand-new Secretary of Defense; his office really was intended to provide civilian coordination across the armed services; Truman really had hurried him into the job; and Forrestal really did meet Truman and Vannevar Bush that morning.[Defense History]history.defense.govHistory James V. Forrestal > Historical Office > Article ViewDefense HistoryJames V. Forrestal > Historical Office > Article View…

The alleged memorandum also handles the limitations of his new office in an interesting way. Rather than implying that Forrestal possessed unlimited inherent authority, it depicts Truman personally authorising him to proceed while retaining ultimate disposition in the presidency. Against the confused and still-developing defence structure of September 1947, that is a plausible governance model for an exceptionally sensitive presidential undertaking.

Yet plausibility is the ceiling of the evidence. Forrestal’s appointment proves that the recipient’s title and timing are correct; the Truman diary proves that Forrestal and Bush met the president that day. Neither proves that the meeting concerned UFOs or that Truman gave Forrestal authority over Majestic Twelve. The official archival record has not produced the independent executive-branch documentation needed to bridge that gap, while later federal examinations have treated the circulated MJ-12 material as unsupported or false.[gao.gov]gao.govOpen source on gao.gov.

Forrestal’s seven-day-old defence role therefore strengthens the alleged memorandum’s historical realism, not its authenticity. The distinction is central to evaluating Truman’s alleged September 1947 authorisation: the document places its supposed secret programme at a remarkably apt moment in the reorganisation of American national-security government, but the genuine record confirms the setting and the actors—not the existence of MJ-12.

Amazon book picks

Further Reading

Books and field guides related to Could Forrestal Have Run MJ 12 in September 1947?. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.

Book

Driven Patriot: The Life and Times of James Forrestal

By Townsend Hoopes, Douglas Brinkley

A haunting portrait of one of the most fascinating and influential figures of the mid-twentieth century, this biography takes a penetrati...

See on Amazon

Book

Top Secret/Majic: Operation Majestic-12 and the United States...

By Stanton T. Friedman

Top Secret/Majic is the result of nuclear physicist and renowned UFO investigator Stanton T. Friedman's twenty-one year search for the tr...

See on Amazon

Book

Endless Frontier: Vannevar Bush, Engineer of the American Cen...

By G. Pascal Zachary

A prodigiously researched biography of Vannevar Bush, one of America’s most awe-inspiring polymaths and the secret force behind the bigge...

See on Amazon

Book

A Cross of Iron: Harry S. Truman and the Origins of the Natio...

By Hogan Michael J

Discusses the national security state that emerged in the first decade of the Cold War.

See on Amazon

Browse more on Amazon:Driven Patriot: The Life and Times of James ForrestalTop Secret/Majic: Operation Majestic 12 and the United States Government's UFO Cover UpEndless Frontier: Vannevar Bush, Engineer of the American Century

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

eBay marketplace picks

Marketplace Samples

Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.

Shop location

UsingUSA USA USAUKCanadaAustraliaIreland

Selected fromUFO poster oneBay.co.uk.

Current eBay listing

VINTAGE UFO FLYING SAUCERS COMIC ADVERTISING A2 POSTER PRINT

GBP 10.76 | Free shippingNewSeller: andys-prints-uk (99.6% positive)Ships from: GB

View listing on eBay

Current eBay listing

I WANT TO BELIEVE UFO POSTER TV SERIES POSTER A0-A1-A2-A3-A4-A5-A6-MAXI 191

GBP 15.99 | Free shippingNewSeller: big-print-uk (99.8% positive)Ships from: GB

View listing on eBay

Current eBay listing

The X-FILES I WANT TO BELIEVE UFO METAL SIGN WALL PLAQUE poster A6 A5 A4 A3

GBP 16.95 | Free shippingNewSeller: metal-plaques-uk (99.5% positive)Ships from: GB

View listing on eBay

Current eBay listing

VINTAGE UFO ABDUCTION ILLUSTRATION FRAMED WALL ART PICTURE POSTER PRINT

GBP 11.99 | Free shippingNewSeller: canvas monkey (99.8% positive)Ships from: GB

View listing on eBay

Browse more oneBay.co.uk

Example items shown for inspiration; availability and pricing can change. Branchoria may earn a commission if you purchase through outbound eBay links.

Endnotes

1. Source: history.defense.gov
Title: History James V. Forrestal > Historical Office > Article View
Link:https://history.defense.gov/Multimedia/Biographies/Article-View/Article/571293/james-v-forrestal/

2. Source: war.gov
Link:https://www.war.gov/Multimedia/Experience/Historic-Highlights-From-the-Department-of-War/

3. Source: history.defense.gov
Link:https://history.defense.gov/Portals/70/Documents/secretaryofdefense/OSDSeries_Vol1.pdf

Published: September 22, 2009

4. Source: en.wikisource.org
Title: MJ-12 Document
Link:https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/MJ-12_Document

Published: November 18, 1952

5. Source: history.defense.gov
Title: History The Department of Defense
Link:https://history.defense.gov/Portals/70/Documents/other/DOD1947-1997OrgLeaders.pdf?ver=MyoK-qqVHsyEMroepBidwQ%3D%3D

Published: August 20, 2009

6. Source: history.defense.gov
Title: History THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Link:https://history.defense.gov/Portals/70/Documents/other/DODDocsEstandOrg1944-1978.pdf

7. Source: archives.gov
Title: National Archives Project BLUE BOOK
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/military/air-force/ufos

8. Source: gao.gov
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/154832

9. Source: vault.fbi.gov
Title: — Federal Bureau of Investigation
Link:https://vault.fbi.gov/search?SearchableText=Majestic

10. Source: fbi.gov
Title: Inside the FBI Podcast: UFOs — FBI
Link:https://www.fbi.gov/video-repository/inside-the-fbi-ufos-102921.mp4/view

11. Source: history.navy.mil
Title: mil Forrestal (CVA-59)
Link:https://www.history.navy.mil/research/histories/ship-histories/danfs/f/forrestal-cva-59.html

12. Source: history.navy.mil
Title: mil James V. Forrestal
Link:https://www.history.navy.mil/browse-by-topic/people/sec-nav/forrestal/james-forrestal.html

13. Source: history.navy.mil
Title: mil Forrestal, James V. Papers
Link:https://www.history.navy.mil/research/archives/Collections/personal-donated-collections/pd-f/forrestal-james-v.html

14. Source: vault.fbi.gov
Link:https://vault.fbi.gov/unexplained-phenomenon/search

15. Source: history.navy.mil
Title: july 26
Link:https://www.history.navy.mil/content/history/nhhc/today-in-history/july-26.html

16. Source: archives.gov
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/guide-fed-records/groups/330.html

17. Source: georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov
Link:https://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/nsc/text/history.html

18. Source: history.defense.gov
Title: stephen t early
Link:https://history.defense.gov/DOD-History/Deputy-Secretaries-of-Defense/Article-View/Article/585252/stephen-t-early/

19. Source: history.defense.gov
Link:https://history.defense.gov/Multimedia/Images/igphoto/2000802825/

20. Source: history.defense.gov
Title: Secretary of Defense Annual Reports
Link:https://history.defense.gov/Historical-Sources/Secretary-of-Defense-Annual-Reports/

21. Source: history.defense.gov
Title: Cold War Foreign Policy Series
Link:https://history.defense.gov/Publications/Cold-War-Foreign-Policy-Series/

22. Source: history.defense.gov
Link:https://history.defense.gov/DOD-DOW-History/Pentagon/History/

23. Source: history.defense.gov
Title: Do D Key Officials
Link:https://history.defense.gov/Publications/DoD-Key-Officials/

24. Source: history.defense.gov
Title: Do D Reforms
Link:https://history.defense.gov/Historical-Sources/DoD-Reforms/

25. Source: history.defense.gov
Title: george c marshall
Link:https://history.defense.gov/Multimedia/Biographies/Article-View/Article/571266/george-c-marshall/

26. Source: history.defense.gov
Title: Secretaries of Defense Historical Series
Link:https://history.defense.gov/Publications/Secretaries-of-Defense-Historical-Series/

27. Source: history.defense.gov
Title: Key Officials Table
Link:https://history.defense.gov/Publications/DoD-Key-Officials/Key-Officials-Table/

28. Source: history.defense.gov
Title: Secretaries of Defense
Link:https://history.defense.gov/DOD-DOW-History/Secretaries-of-Defense/

29. Source: history.navy.mil
Link:https://www.history.navy.mil/our-collections/photography/numerical-list-of-images/nhhc-series/nh-series/80-G-704000/80-G-704442.html

30. Source: trumanlibrary.gov
Link:https://www.trumanlibrary.gov/photograph-records/97-1766

31. Source: trumanlibrary.gov
Link:https://www.trumanlibrary.gov/library/cabinet

32. Source: trumanlibrary.gov
Link:https://www.trumanlibrary.gov/calendar/search?body_value_op=word&comment_keywords=forrestal&page=1

33. Source: bibliotecapleyades.net
Title: The Majestic 12
Link:https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_mj12_19.htm

34. Source: ro.scribd.com
Link:https://ro.scribd.com/document/472644084/196986

35. Source: trumanlibrary.gov
Title: John H. Ohly Oral History Interview | Harry S. Truman
Link:https://www.trumanlibrary.gov/library/oral-histories/ohly

36. Source: law.cornell.edu
Link:https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/3002

37. Source: gao.justia.com
Title: department of defense
Link:https://gao.justia.com/department-of-defense/1995/7

38. Source: trumanlibrary.gov
Link:https://www.trumanlibrary.gov/library/federal-record/records-office-secretary-defense-public-statements-secretary-defense-record

39. Source: trumanlibrary.gov
Link:https://www.trumanlibrary.gov/library/federal-record/general-records-department-navy-public-statements-secretary-navy-record

40. Source: internationalflyingsaucerbureau.com
Title: Majestic 12
Link:https://www.internationalflyingsaucerbureau.com/majestic-12/

41. Source: trumanlibrary.gov
Link:https://www.trumanlibrary.gov/library/public-papers/10/letter-secretary-patterson-and-secretary-forrestal-concerning-unification

Additional References

42. Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_mAPOJs3dWI

43. Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PeULVsP-jEQ

44. Source: youtube.com
Title: 1 UFO Crash Retrieval Expert on CIA Alien Files & Majestic 12 | Ryan Wood
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8JeoxrJ0mI4

45. Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HZiEFA2h79U

46. Source: loc.gov
Link:https://www.loc.gov/pictures/resource/ds.14888

47. Source: visitthecapitol.gov
Title: Letter from James Forrestal to Representative Clare E. Hoffman of Michigan,
Link:https://www.visitthecapitol.gov/node/1125

48. Source: muckrock.com
Link:https://www.muckrock.com/news/archives/2017/jun/05/fbi-majestic-12/

49. Source: commons.wikimedia.org
Link:https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3AThe_Department_of_Defense%2C_1947-1997-_organization_and_leaders%28IA_departmentofdefe00roge%29.pdf

50. Source: studylib.net
Link:https://studylib.net/doc/9820999/2.-%25E2%2580%2593-birdplay.—wordpress.com

51. Source: dugganusa.com
Link:https://www.dugganusa.com/post/majestic-12-fails-every-check-we-run-on-a-forgery-and-the-fbi-already-said-bogus