Within Anomaly Tests

What Did the GAO Finding Actually Establish About MJ 12?

The GAO found no evidence that the written MJ-12 material originated in the executive branch, a broader test than any single formatting anomaly.

154 sources 3 graphics
Preview for What Did the GAO Finding Actually Establish About MJ 12?

On this page

  • What the GAO set out to establish
  • Why non government provenance matters
  • What the finding leaves unresolved

Introduction

The Government Accountability Office’s 1995 finding on Majestic 12 (MJ-12) addressed a more fundamental question than whether a particular typeface, date style or security marking looked suspicious: could the publicly circulated MJ-12 material be traced to the United States executive branch as genuine government records? The answer produced by the GAO’s enquiries was no. The agencies consulted said their knowledge of MJ-12 came from material supplied by people outside government, not from records generated within their own systems, and the GAO reported that there was no evidence the material constituted documents originally created in the executive branch.[Government Accountability Office]gao.govGovernment Accountability Office[Comments on Majestic 12 Material] | U.S. GAOJuly 28, 1995…Published: July 28, 1995

GAO Finding illustration 1
Explanatory illustration 1

That finding matters because provenance — a document’s demonstrable history of creation, custody and transmission — tests something broader than appearance. It does not prove that every paper bearing an MJ-12 label was fabricated by a particular person, nor does it prove that no secret programme could ever have existed. It establishes the narrower but highly consequential point that investigators failed to find an executive-branch documentary origin for the publicly circulated MJ-12 material.

What the GAO set out to establish

The MJ-12 finding emerged alongside Representative Steven Schiff’s congressional effort to obtain government records concerning the 1947 Roswell incident. On 28 July 1995 the GAO issued its larger Roswell report, Government Records: Results of a Search for Records Concerning the 1947 Crash Near Roswell, New Mexico, and a separate two-page communication dealing specifically with Majestic 12. The latter responded to Schiff’s request by asking several federal bodies for their views on the authenticity of the publicly circulating MJ-12 written material.[GovInfo]govinfo.govGAOREPORTS NSIADGAO/NSIAD-95-187 - Government Records: Results of a Search for Records Concerning the 1947 Crash Near Roswell, New Mexico - GAOREP…

This distinction is important. The GAO was not simply commissioning a forensic examination of one questioned sheet of paper. Its enquiry asked whether institutions that should understand federal classification, Air Force records and archival holdings possessed evidence connecting the purported material to government.

The bodies consulted included the Information Security Oversight Office (ISOO), which oversees executive-branch programmes for classified national-security information; the Office of the Secretary of the Air Force’s security and investigative apparatus; and the National Archives. The GAO also obtained the views of archivists at the Harry S. Truman and Dwight D. Eisenhower presidential libraries.[Google Groups]groups.google.comGroups CONSPIrGoogle GroupsCONSPIrMarch 12, 2000…Published: March 12, 2000

Their responses converged on the provenance question. According to the GAO, the relevant agencies said that their knowledge of MJ-12 was confined to material that nongovernmental persons had submitted to them. They found no MJ-12 records in their files. The resulting conclusion was that there was no evidence showing that the publicly circulated material consisted of documents originally created in the executive branch. The GAO added that its own work had uncovered nothing contradicting the conclusions reached by those agencies.[Government Accountability Office]gao.govGovernment Accountability Office[Comments on Majestic 12 Material] | U.S. GAOJuly 28, 1995…Published: July 28, 1995

That is stronger than saying that investigators merely failed to recognise a familiar document format. It means that when the material was checked against the institutional record systems from which it supposedly descended, investigators did not establish the government provenance that the documents’ claimed identity required.

Why non-government provenance matters

A document can imitate the outward characteristics of an official record without possessing an official history. Classification stamps, official names, memorandum formats and references to real organisations are features that can be reproduced. Provenance asks a different set of questions: Where was the document created? Which office held it? Is there a registered copy, file reference or related correspondence? Do records elsewhere in the bureaucracy independently refer to it?

For MJ-12, those questions are unusually important because the documents purport to describe activity at the highest levels of the executive branch. A genuine programme involving presidents, senior defence officials, the National Security Council and highly classified information would ordinarily be expected to leave some documentary relationships even if much of its substantive record remained classified or compartmented. The GAO finding was that the searched institutional sources did not establish those relationships.[Government Accountability Office]gao.govGovernment Accountability Office[Comments on Majestic 12 Material] | U.S. GAOJuly 28, 1995…Published: July 28, 1995

The National Archives’ separate MJ-12 research shows how extensive that problem became. Archives staff searched Air Force and Joint Chiefs of Staff records; the Truman and Eisenhower libraries searched their holdings; and National Security Council indexes were checked under terms including “MJ-12”, “majestic”, “unidentified flying objects”, “UFO”, “flying saucers”, “extraterrestrial biological entities” and “Aquarius”. Those searches were negative apart from the controversial Cutler-Twining memorandum dated 14 July 1954.[National Archives]archives.govNational Archives Project BLUE BOOKNational ArchivesProject BLUE BOOK - Unidentified Flying Objects | National Archives…

Even that apparent archival exception did not solve the provenance problem. The National Archives reported that the Cutler-Twining paper lacked the Top Secret register number expected for the series in which it was found; there was no other MJ-12 material in its folder; searches of related defence and Air Force records produced no supporting information; and enquiries to the Air Force, Joint Chiefs and National Security Council yielded nothing further. National Archives researchers also found no record of the purported 16 July 1954 National Security Council meeting and no mention of MJ-12 or Majestic in the NSC meeting minutes for that month.[National Archives]archives.govNational Archives Project BLUE BOOKNational ArchivesProject BLUE BOOK - Unidentified Flying Objects | National Archives…

The distinction between location and provenance is therefore crucial. Finding a questioned paper in a government archive does not by itself establish that the government created it. Archives can contain material acquired or inserted through many routes. What matters for authentication is whether the record can be integrated into the administrative trail of the office that supposedly produced and used it. The National Archives’ findings did not provide that integration for the Cutler-Twining memorandum.[National Archives]archives.govNational Archives Project BLUE BOOKNational ArchivesProject BLUE BOOK - Unidentified Flying Objects | National Archives…

GAO Finding illustration 2
Explanatory illustration 2

The “MJ Twelve” message provided a useful control case

One part of the GAO enquiry illustrates particularly clearly why an official-looking document should not be equated with an official document. While examining material that members of the public had supplied to ISOO in connection with earlier Freedom of Information Act requests, the GAO encountered a message dated 17 November 1980. It appeared to originate in the Operations Division of the Air Force Office of Special Investigations (AFOSI) and contained the words “MJ Twelve”.[Government Accountability Office]gao.govGovernment Accountability Office[Comments on Majestic 12 Material] | U.S. GAOJuly 28, 1995…Published: July 28, 1995

Rather than treating the apparent Air Force origin as proof, the GAO contacted AFOSI. Its Investigative Operations Center reported that a search of AFOSI files disclosed no official record copy. More importantly, AFOSI had already examined the message during an earlier Freedom of Information Act enquiry and had concluded that it was a forgery. The GAO incorporated that result into its MJ-12 findings.[Google Groups]groups.google.comGroups CONSPIrGoogle GroupsCONSPIrMarch 12, 2000…Published: March 12, 2000

This is a valuable example because the test does not depend simply on spotting an oddity on the page. The document made an institutional claim — that it originated from a particular Air Force investigative organisation — that could be checked against that organisation. The purported originating body rejected the claimed provenance and reported no official record copy.

The FBI record supplies a parallel institutional check on the better-known MJ-12 briefing material. The Bureau says that two of its offices received versions of an “Operation Majestic-12” memorandum in 1988; after the matter was referred to the Air Force, the Air Force investigation determined the document to be fake. The FBI continues to describe the document that way in its public records.[FBI]vault.fbi.gov— Federal Bureau of InvestigationFBI — Federal Bureau of Investigation…

Together, these findings are more consequential than an isolated typographical anomaly. They represent attempts to test claimed government origins against the agencies and records that should be capable of corroborating them.

What the finding actually establishes

The safest reading of the GAO conclusion is neither weaker nor stronger than its wording warrants. It establishes three closely connected points.

First, the agencies questioned by the GAO did not report possessing internally generated MJ-12 records corresponding to the publicly circulated material. Instead, their knowledge of those materials came from submissions by people outside government.[Government Accountability Office]gao.govGovernment Accountability Office[Comments on Majestic 12 Material] | U.S. GAOJuly 28, 1995…Published: July 28, 1995

Second, the enquiries produced no evidence of executive-branch creation for the circulating MJ-12 material. ISOO and the Air Force therefore advised that the material should not be treated as though it had actually been classified by an executive-branch agency or official, and the GAO found nothing contradicting their assessment.[Google Groups]groups.google.comGroups CONSPIrGoogle GroupsCONSPIrMarch 12, 2000…Published: March 12, 2000

Third, searches extending into presidential-library, classified intelligence and National Security Council holdings failed to produce the expected corroborating record trail. The National Archives’ own searches likewise found no supporting MJ-12 documentation around the anomalous Cutler-Twining memorandum.[Government Accountability Office]gao.govGovernment Accountability Office[Comments on Majestic 12 Material] | U.S. GAOJuly 28, 1995…Published: July 28, 1995

For document authentication, that combination is significant. A peculiar comma or unconventional date format might have an innocent bureaucratic explanation. A sustained failure to establish the claimed governmental provenance attacks a more basic proposition: that these are surviving products of the government offices they purport to represent.

GAO Finding illustration 3
Explanatory illustration 3

What the finding leaves unresolved

The GAO finding is sometimes easy to overstate. “No evidence that these materials originated in the executive branch” is not logically identical to “the GAO proved exactly who forged every MJ-12 document”. The enquiry did not identify a single creator responsible for the entire corpus, establish when every item was manufactured, or reconstruct the complete route by which each document entered public circulation.

Nor can an unsuccessful records search prove the universal proposition that no highly secret activity bearing some resemblance to the MJ-12 story could ever have existed. Government records can be lost, destroyed, misfiled or remain inaccessible, and the larger Roswell investigation itself found that some records covering Roswell Army Air Field activities had been destroyed. The disposition documentation did not reveal who destroyed those records, when they did so or under what authority.[Justia GAO Reports]gao.justia.comGAO Reports Justia GAO ReportsJustia GAO ReportsJustia GAO Reports - NSIAD-95-187 - Government Records - Department of JusticeJuly 28, 1995…Published: July 28, 1995

But that limitation cuts both ways. Missing records cannot positively authenticate a document whose government origin has not been demonstrated. A hypothesis that a secret programme destroyed or concealed every corroborating record may explain why confirmation is absent, but it does not turn that absence into evidence that the questioned documents are genuine.

This is why the GAO result belongs on a different evidential level from debates over whether one MJ-12 formatting convention was normal in the 1940s or 1950s. Individual anomalies can be disputed one at a time. The executive-branch origin test asks whether the documentary system as a whole supplies independent evidence that the papers came from where they claim to have come from.

On that narrower and more defensible question, the official record is clear: the GAO found no evidence establishing executive-branch origin for the publicly circulated MJ-12 written material, the agencies it consulted reported no corresponding records of their own, presidential-library searches supplied no corroborating MJ-12 trail, and one apparently official “MJ Twelve” message was specifically determined by AFOSI to be forged.[Government Accountability Office]gao.govGovernment Accountability Office[Comments on Majestic 12 Material] | U.S. GAOJuly 28, 1995…Published: July 28, 1995

The finding therefore does not answer every conceivable question about alleged secret programmes. It does something more directly relevant to the documents themselves: it leaves their central claim to governmental provenance unsupported by the government record systems examined.

Amazon book picks

Further Reading

Books and field guides related to What Did the GAO Finding Actually Establish About MJ 12?. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.

eBay marketplace picks

Marketplace Samples

Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.

UsingUSA

Selected fromUFO poster oneBay.co.uk.

Endnotes

1. Source: gao.gov
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/154832

Source snippet

Government Accountability Office[Comments on Majestic 12 Material] | U.S. GAOJuly 28, 1995...

Published: July 28, 1995

2. Source: govinfo.gov
Title: GAOREPORTS NSIAD 95 187
Link:https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD

Source snippet

GAO/NSIAD-95-187 - Government Records: Results of a Search for Records Concerning the 1947 Crash Near Roswell, New Mexico - GAOREP...

3. Source: groups.google.com
Title: Groups CONSPIr
Link:https://groups.google.com/g/alt.ufo.reports/c/1g8hHH9pHEo

Source snippet

Google GroupsCONSPIrMarch 12, 2000...

Published: March 12, 2000

4. Source: archives.gov
Title: National Archives Project BLUE BOOK
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/military/air-force/ufos

Source snippet

National ArchivesProject BLUE BOOK - Unidentified Flying Objects | National Archives...

5. Source: vault.fbi.gov
Title: — Federal Bureau of Investigation
Link:https://vault.fbi.gov/unexplained-phenomenon/search

Source snippet

FBI — Federal Bureau of Investigation...

6. Source: vault.fbi.gov
Title: — Federal Bureau of Investigation
Link:https://vault.fbi.gov/search?SearchableText=Majestic

Source snippet

FBI — Federal Bureau of Investigation...

7. Source: gao.justia.com
Title: GAO Reports Justia GAO Reports
Link:https://gao.justia.com/department-of-justice/1995/7/government-records-nsiad-95-187/

Source snippet

Justia GAO ReportsJustia GAO Reports - NSIAD-95-187 - Government Records - Department of JusticeJuly 28, 1995...

Published: July 28, 1995

8. Source: archives.gov
Title: Guide to House Records: Chapter 11 | National Archives
Link:https://www.archives.gov/legislative/guide/house/chapter-11.html

9. Source: trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov
Title: president donald j trump protecting taxpayer money
Link:https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefings-statements/president-donald-j-trump-protecting-taxpayer-money/

10. Source: archives.fbi.gov
Title: ufos 040610
Link:https://archives.fbi.gov/archives/news/stories/2010/april/ufos_040610

11. Source: georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov
Link:https://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2002/11/20021125-10.html

12. Source: georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov
Link:https://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2002/11/text/20021104-3.html

13. Source: groups.google.com
Title: Zvp N5RJVi FI
Link:https://groups.google.com/g/alt.alien.research/c/ZvpN5RJViFI

14. Source: clintonwhitehouse4.archives.gov
Title: staf bsicacct
Link:https://clintonwhitehouse4.archives.gov/pcscb/staf_bsicacct.html

15. Source: gao.gov
Title: nsiad 95 187
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/nsiad

16. Source: gao.justia.com
Title: general services administration
Link:https://gao.justia.com/general-services-administration/1995/7/

17. Source: clintonwhitehouse6.archives.gov
Link:https://clintonwhitehouse6.archives.gov/1994/07/1994-07-14-npr-report-on-quality-leadership-and-management-part-a.html

18. Source: clintonwhitehouse6.archives.gov
Title: 1994 06 30 npr report on streamlining management control part
Link:https://clintonwhitehouse6.archives.gov/1994/06/1994-06-30-npr-report-on-streamlining-management-control-part.html

19. Source: clintonwhitehouse6.archives.gov
Title: 1994 07 14 npr report quality leadership and management pt
Link:https://clintonwhitehouse6.archives.gov/1994/07/1994-07-14-npr-report-quality-leadership-and-management-pt.html

20. Source: gao.gov
Title: nsiad 92 72
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/nsiad

21. Source: gao.gov
Title: nsiad 90 195
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/nsiad

22. Source: gao.gov
Title: b 226708
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/b-226708

23. Source: gao.gov
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/120820

24. Source: gao.gov
Title: b 192766
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/b-192766

25. Source: gao.gov
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/094629

26. Source: gao.gov
Title: b 147637 o.m
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/b-147637-o.m

27. Source: archives.gov
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/guide-fed-records/groups/411.html

28. Source: obamawhitehouse.archives.gov
Link:https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/node/15331/

29. Source: obamawhitehouse.archives.gov
Title: legislative branch
Link:https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/1600/legislative-branch/

30. Source: archives.gov
Title: presidential libraries
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/topics/uaps/presidential-libraries

31. Source: fbi.gov
Link:https://www.fbi.gov/video-repository/inside-the-fbi-ufos-102921.mp4/view

32. Source: vault.fbi.gov
Title: alphabetical listing collection
Link:https://vault.fbi.gov/alphabetical-listing-collection?b_start%3Aint=1100

33. Source: vault.fbi.gov
Link:https://vault.fbi.gov/search?SearchableText=Unknown&b_start%3Aint=630

34. Source: vault.fbi.gov
Title: atct topic view
Link:https://vault.fbi.gov/alphabetical-listing-collection/atct_topic_view?-C=&amp%3Alist=&b_start%3Aint=1100

35. Source: vault.fbi.gov
Title: atct topic view
Link:https://vault.fbi.gov/alphabetical-listing-collection/atct_topic_view?b_start%3Aint=1100

36. Source: vault.fbi.gov
Link:https://vault.fbi.gov/search?SearchableText=Aircraft+Commander

37. Source: vault.fbi.gov
Link:https://vault.fbi.gov/search?created%3Adate%3Alist=1970%2F02%2F01%3A00%3A00+US%2FEastern&created_usage=range%3Amin&portal_type%3Alist=ATFile&portal_type%3Alist=ATImage&portal_type%3Alist=Document&portal_type%3Alist=Event&portal_type%3Alist=FDPS&portal_type%3Alist=Favorite&portal_type%3Alist=File&portal_type%3Alist=Folder&portal_type%3Alist=Image&portal_type%3Alist=Large+Plone+Folder&portal_type%3Alist=Link&portal_type%3Alist=News+Item&portal_type%3Alist=Topic&pt_toggle=%23&submit=Search

38. Source: vault.fbi.gov
Title: search?SearchableText=robert&b start:int=3390
Link:https://vault.fbi.gov/search%3FSearchableText%3Drobert%26b_start%3Aint%3D3390

39. Source: vault.fbi.gov
Link:https://vault.fbi.gov/search?SearchableText=blue+book&amp=&b_start%3Aint=870

41. Source: gao.justia.com
Title: department of defense
Link:https://gao.justia.com/department-of-defense/1995/7

42. Source: gao.gov
Link:https://www.gao.gov/legal/other-legal-work/transferred-functions

43. Source: gao.gov
Title: b 131091
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/b-131091

44. Source: gao.gov
Title: b 129108
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/b-129108

45. Source: gao.gov
Title: b 119746
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/b-119746

46. Source: gao.gov
Title: b 109426
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/b-109426

47. Source: lurch2.blogspot.com
Title: majestic 12
Link:https://lurch2.blogspot.com/2013/09/majestic-12.html

48. Source: phatsoheff.tripod.com
Link:https://phatsoheff.tripod.com/ufo.html

49. Source: sgp.fas.org
Link:https://sgp.fas.org/othergov/roswell.html

50. Source: ro.scribd.com
Link:https://ro.scribd.com/document/472644084/196986

51. Source: internationalflyingsaucerbureau.com
Title: Majestic 12
Link:https://www.internationalflyingsaucerbureau.com/majestic-12/

52. Source: apocrypedia.com
Title: roswell incident
Link:https://apocrypedia.com/entry/roswell-incident/

53. Source: en.wikisource.org
Title: MJ 12 Document
Link:https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/MJ-12_Document

Additional References

54. Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uvpZmSbeSTU

Source snippet

GAO Roswell report 1995 Steven Schiff *ACTUAL UFO FOOTAGE* Naval Ships Swarmed by UFOS | Ancient Aliens | #Shorts | History...

55. Source: youtube.com
Title: Art Bell & Rep Steven Schiff
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hije5SvzTRc

Source snippet

The Roswell Incident: What the Declassified Files Actually Reveal...

56. Source: youtube.com
Title: Congressman Steven Schiff
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J0-itHJNgbY

Source snippet

Art Bell & Rep Steven Schiff - Roswell Crash & Waco - Black Screen - Interview Only - 7/31/1995...

57. Source: scribd.com
Link:https://www.scribd.com/document/704526704/6d8c788246cbc2f54d9cb67e4a5c749d

58. Source: skepticalinquirer.org
Link:https://skepticalinquirer.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/29/2019/03/Issue-02-18.pdf

59. Source: cufon.org
Link:https://www.cufon.org/cufon/cufon-v.htm

60. Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/100091249837062/posts/continuing-the-david-wilcock-ancient-aliens-series-season-12-episode-9-july-7-20/975060618878924/

61. Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/100091249837062/posts/continuing-the-david-wilcock-ancient-aliens-series-season-12-episode-9-the-majes/955719397479713/

62. Source: ufoplanet.yolasite.com
Link:https://ufoplanet.yolasite.com/mj-12.php

63. Source: scribd.com
Link:https://www.scribd.com/document/875558418/Project-BLUE-BOOK-Unidentified-Flying-Objects