What the GAO Search Found About MJ 12

Introduction

The General Accounting Office (GAO) reached a narrow but important conclusion about the alleged MJ-12 documents in 1995: after consulting the federal bodies most likely to possess or recognise such records, it found no evidence that the publicly circulated material was genuinely created within the executive branch of the United States government. The Information Security Oversight Office, the Air Force and the National Archives all told GAO that their knowledge of the material came from documents supplied by people outside government, not from official files. GAO said its own work uncovered nothing that contradicted that assessment.[GAO]gao.govGAO[Comments on Majestic 12 Material] | U.S. GAOJuly 28, 1995…Published: July 28, 1995

That finding is stronger than simply saying that one archive could not locate a particular file. Searches reached presidential libraries, National Security Council material, Air Force records and other federal holdings. But it is also narrower than proof that no secret body called MJ-12 could ever have existed. The evidential question GAO could answer was whether the disputed papers could be connected to an identifiable executive-branch documentary trail. On that question, the trail was absent.

Why government records were searched

GAO’s examination of MJ-12 grew out of a broader inquiry requested by Representative Steven H. Schiff into surviving federal records concerning the 1947 Roswell incident. The main GAO investigation examined classified and unclassified material from the late 1940s and 1950s across the Department of Defense, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Central Intelligence Agency, National Security Council and other organisations. A separate two-page letter, also dated 28 July 1995, addressed the authenticity of the publicly circulated Majestic 12 material directly.[gao.gov]gao.govnsiadGovernment Records: Results of a Search for Records Concerning the 1947 Crash Near Roswell, New Mexico | U.S. GAOJuly 28, 1995…Published: July 28, 1995

That distinction matters. The main Roswell audit asked what government records survived concerning the 1947 crash. The MJ-12 letter asked a more specific provenance question: did federal agencies recognise the alleged Majestic 12 papers as authentic records produced inside government?

GAO approached agencies with institutional responsibility or relevant archival holdings. It consulted the Information Security Oversight Office (ISOO), which oversees executive-branch programmes for classified national-security information; the Office of the Secretary of the Air Force’s security and investigative staff; and the National Archives. According to GAO, all said that what they knew of MJ-12 came from written material submitted by nongovernmental individuals. Their own files supplied no independent documentary source for it.[GAO]gao.govGAO[Comments on Majestic 12 Material] | U.S. GAOJuly 28, 1995…Published: July 28, 1995

This is an important authentication test because a purported presidentially authorised, highly classified programme would normally be expected to leave some corroborating administrative footprint beyond a single disputed set of papers: associated correspondence, classification records, index entries, briefing references, routing copies, meeting documentation or later records referring back to the programme. Secrecy could sharply limit such traces, but the existence of multiple independent records would make an executive-branch origin considerably easier to establish.

The executive-branch evidence gap

GAO reported a consistent answer from the agencies it contacted: they had found no records in their files relating to Majestic 12, and there was no evidence that the circulating MJ-12 material consisted of documents originally created within the executive branch. ISOO and the Air Force went further, advising that the papers should not be treated as material that had actually been classified by an executive-branch agency or official. GAO stated that its own investigation found nothing contradicting those conclusions.[GAO]gao.govGAO[Comments on Majestic 12 Material] | U.S. GAOJuly 28, 1995…Published: July 28, 1995

The presidential-library searches reinforced that gap. Archivists at both the Harry S. Truman and Dwight D. Eisenhower libraries told GAO that they had received public questions about MJ-12 for years. Their searches, including classified intelligence and National Security Council material, had produced nothing fitting the description of the alleged Majestic 12 papers and no references to that designation.[GAO]gao.govGAO[Comments on Majestic 12 Material] | U.S. GAOJuly 28, 1995…Published: July 28, 1995

The National Archives describes a similarly broad search history. Its staff searched Air Force and Joint Chiefs of Staff holdings, while the Truman and Eisenhower libraries examined their own records. National Security Council indexes were checked under terms including “MJ-12”, “majestic”, “unidentified flying objects”, “UFO”, “flying saucers”, “extraterrestrial biological entities” and “Aquarius”. Those searches were negative apart from the disputed Cutler-to-Twining memorandum already known to researchers.[National Archives]archives.govNational Archives Project BLUE BOOKNational ArchivesProject BLUE BOOK - Unidentified Flying Objects | National ArchivesJune 25, 2024…Published: June 25, 2024

That exception does not supply the missing corroborating chain. The Cutler-Twining memorandum was physically located in National Archives holdings, but archival staff identified multiple anomalies. It lacked the Top Secret register number expected for the series in which it appeared; no related MJ-12 material was found in its folder; searches of Secretary of Defense, Joint Chiefs, Air Force and National Security Council records produced no supporting documentation; and the Eisenhower Library found no corresponding presidential appointment-book entry for the purported 16 July 1954 briefing. National Archives research also established that Robert Cutler was away inspecting military facilities in Europe and North Africa when the memorandum was supposedly issued in his name on 14 July.[National Archives]archives.govNational Archives Project BLUE BOOKNational ArchivesProject BLUE BOOK - Unidentified Flying Objects | National ArchivesJune 25, 2024…Published: June 25, 2024

The Archives makes a particularly useful distinction in this context: certifying a reproduction as a true copy of a document in its custody is not the same as authenticating the document or the claims written on it. Physical presence in a federal file can establish where a paper was found; it does not by itself establish who created it or how it entered the file.[National Archives]archives.govNational Archives Project BLUE BOOKNational ArchivesProject BLUE BOOK - Unidentified Flying Objects | National ArchivesJune 25, 2024…Published: June 25, 2024

The “MJ Twelve” message failed a second authenticity test

GAO also encountered a document that might, at first sight, have offered independent support for the name. Among material sent to ISOO by members of the public in connection with earlier Freedom of Information Act requests was a message dated 17 November 1980 that appeared to have originated within the Air Force Office of Special Investigations (AFOSI). It contained the words “MJ Twelve”.[Google Groups]groups.google.comGroups CONSPIrGoogle GroupsCONSPIrMarch 12, 2000…Published: March 12, 2000

Rather than treating the apparent government formatting as proof, GAO asked AFOSI to check the message. The commander of AFOSI’s Investigative Operations Center reported in February 1995 that a search of AFOSI files had found no official record copy. He also told GAO that AFOSI had examined the same message during an earlier Freedom of Information Act inquiry and had concluded that it was a forgery.[Google Groups]groups.google.comGroups CONSPIrGoogle GroupsCONSPIrMarch 12, 2000…Published: March 12, 2000

This episode illustrates the core problem GAO was testing. A document can contain official terminology, security markings and the name of a real government organisation while still lacking an authenticating record inside that organisation. For provenance purposes, an internally retained copy, routing record or related file can matter more than how convincing the typography looks. The supposed 1980 AFOSI message supplied no such confirmation and therefore did not close the executive-branch evidence gap.

What a negative search can and cannot establish

GAO’s conclusion should be stated precisely. It did not say that its research constituted mathematical proof that an MJ-12 organisation could never have existed. It said there was no evidence that the publicly circulated Majestic 12 material represented actual documents originally created in the executive branch, and that GAO found nothing contradicting the agencies that had reached that conclusion.[GAO]gao.govGAO[Comments on Majestic 12 Material] | U.S. GAOJuly 28, 1995…Published: July 28, 1995

There are practical reasons not to turn any archival search into an absolute claim about everything that might once have existed. GAO’s broader Roswell investigation found that some Roswell Army Air Field records had been destroyed. Administrative records covering March 1945 through December 1949 and outgoing messages covering October 1946 through December 1949 were gone, and the surviving disposition documentation did not identify who destroyed them, when the destruction occurred or under what authority. GAO also noted that its search was complicated by missing records and by record-management rules that were sometimes unclear or changing.[Intelligence Resource Program]irp.fas.orgIntelligence Resource Program GAOIntelligence Resource ProgramGAO - Government Records: Results of a Search for Records Concerning the 1947 Crash Near Roswell, New Mexico…

That missing-record problem is genuinely relevant to how strongly a negative search should be expressed, but it does not positively authenticate MJ-12. A destroyed Roswell message file does not establish that the missing messages mentioned Majestic 12, and GAO did not claim that they did. Likewise, the possibility that exceptionally sensitive records could have been compartmented, misfiled or destroyed is a reason to avoid claiming perfect archival completeness; it is not affirmative evidence that the disputed documents are genuine.

The evidential weight instead comes from convergence. The problem was not merely that a single “MJ-12” folder was missing. Agencies responsible for classified-information oversight did not recognise the circulating material as their records; relevant Air Force files did not corroborate it; presidential libraries found no supporting references; National Security Council searches were negative; the principal archival MJ-12 memorandum presented anomalies rather than a normal documentary trail; and another purported official document using “MJ Twelve” was judged forged by the agency it supposedly came from.[archives.gov]archives.govNational Archives Project BLUE BOOKNational ArchivesProject BLUE BOOK - Unidentified Flying Objects | National ArchivesJune 25, 2024…Published: June 25, 2024

For the alleged MJ-12 documents, that is the central significance of the GAO search. It did not settle every conceivable historical hypothesis about secret government activity. It did establish that, when investigators looked for the institutional traces that should support the papers’ claimed provenance, they did not find an executive-branch record trail capable of authenticating them.

Amazon book picks

Further Reading

Books and field guides related to What the GAO Search Found About MJ 12. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.

Book

Top Secret/Majic: Operation Majestic-12 and the United States...

By Stanton T. Friedman

Top Secret/Majic is the result of nuclear physicist and renowned UFO investigator Stanton T. Friedman's twenty-one year search for the tr...

See on Amazon

Book

UFOs and the National Security State: Chronology of a Cover-U...

By Richard M. Dolan

Included in this volume are the records of more than fifty military bases relating to innumerable violations of sensitive airspace by unk...

See on Amazon

Book

Archives: Principles and Practices

By Laura A. Millar

This new and extensively revised second edition offers an international perspective on archives management, providing authoritative guida...

See on Amazon

Book

The Roswell Incident

By Charles Berlitz, William L. Moore et al.

The Roswell Incident was the most important UFO encounter of our century. But the facts about the incident are still being hidden from th...

See on Amazon

Browse more on Amazon:Top Secret/Majic: Operation Majestic 12 and the United States Government's UFO Cover UpUFOs and the National Security State: Chronology of a Cover Up,Archives: Principles and Practices

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

eBay marketplace picks

Marketplace Samples

Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.

Shop location

UsingUSA USA USAUKCanadaAustraliaIreland

Selected fromUFO poster oneBay.co.uk.

Current eBay listing

VINTAGE UFO ABDUCTION ILLUSTRATION FRAMED WALL ART PICTURE POSTER PRINT

GBP 11.99 | Free shippingNewSeller: canvas monkey (99.8% positive)Ships from: GB

View listing on eBay

Current eBay listing

I Want To Believe UFO Poster Print The X-Files Television TV A5 A4 A3 Art Print

GBP 5.99 | Free shippingNewSeller: the finepaper house (99.1% positive)Ships from: GB

View listing on eBay

Current eBay listing

I WANT TO BELIEVE UFO POSTER TV SERIES POSTER A0-A1-A2-A3-A4-A5-A6-MAXI 191

GBP 15.99 | Free shippingNewSeller: big-print-uk (99.8% positive)Ships from: GB

View listing on eBay

Current eBay listing

Retro Framed UFO Flying Saucers Art Print Poster Wall Art In Great Condition A3

GBP 21.50 | Shipping GBP 5.15NewSeller: robar 499043 (100.0% positive)Ships from: GB

View listing on eBay

Browse more oneBay.co.uk

Example items shown for inspiration; availability and pricing can change. Branchoria may earn a commission if you purchase through outbound eBay links.

Endnotes

1. Source: gao.gov
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/154832

Published: July 28, 1995

2. Source: gao.gov
Title: nsiad 95 187
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/nsiad

Published: July 28, 1995

3. Source: archives.gov
Title: National Archives Project BLUE BOOK
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/military/air-force/ufos

Published: June 25, 2024

4. Source: groups.google.com
Title: Groups CONSPIr
Link:https://groups.google.com/g/alt.ufo.reports/c/1g8hHH9pHEo

Published: March 12, 2000

5. Source: archives.gov
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/topics/uaps/presidential-libraries

6. Source: archives.gov
Title: rg26 vesseldoc tampa
Link:https://www.archives.gov/atlanta/finding-aids/rg26_vesseldoc_tampa.html

7. Source: archives.gov
Title: R G 21
Link:https://www.archives.gov/atlanta/finding-aids/rg21-2363797

8. Source: archives.gov
Title: Do Records Show Proof of UFOs? | National Archives
Link:https://www.archives.gov/news/articles/do-records-show-proof-of-ufos

9. Source: archives.gov
Title: ¿Registros muestran prueba de ovnis? | National Archives
Link:https://www.archives.gov/espanol/ovnis

10. Source: trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov
Title: remarks president trump president xi china joint press statement beijing china
Link:https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefings-statements/remarks-president-trump-president-xi-china-joint-press-statement-beijing-china/

11. Source: gao.gov
Title: b 261832
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/b-261832

12. Source: gao.gov
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/t-nsiad

13. Source: gao.gov
Title: b 258265
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/b-258265

14. Source: gao.gov
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/hr

15. Source: gao.gov
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/hr

16. Source: gao.gov
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/hr

17. Source: gao.gov
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/hr

18. Source: gao.gov
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/hr

19. Source: books.google.com
Title: Government Records
Link:https://books.google.com/books/about/Government_Records.html?id=t4fL5KNU3uwC

20. Source: files.gao.gov
Link:https://files.gao.gov/gao-01-1012sp/zNM.html

21. Source: files.gao.gov
Link:https://files.gao.gov/gao-01-1012sp/NM.html

22. Source: gao.gov
Title: b 129108
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/b-129108

23. Source: irp.fas.org
Title: Intelligence Resource Program GAO
Link:https://irp.fas.org/gao/nsi95187.htm

24. Source: sloppyintelligence.com
Title: Roswell incident
Link:https://sloppyintelligence.com/roswell-incident-2/

25. Source: lurch2.blogspot.com
Title: majestic 12
Link:https://lurch2.blogspot.com/2013/09/majestic-12.html

26. Source: phatsoheff.tripod.com
Link:https://phatsoheff.tripod.com/ufo.html

27. Source: sgp.fas.org
Link:https://sgp.fas.org/othergov/roswell.html

28. Source: ro.scribd.com
Link:https://ro.scribd.com/document/472644084/196986

29. Source: gao.justia.com
Title: department of defense
Link:https://gao.justia.com/department-of-defense/1995/7

30. Source: internationalflyingsaucerbureau.com
Title: Majestic 12
Link:https://www.internationalflyingsaucerbureau.com/majestic-12/

31. Source: decur.org
Title: Roswell Incident
Link:https://decur.org/cases/roswell-1947

32. Source: en.wikisource.org
Title: MJ 12 Document
Link:https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/MJ-12_Document

Additional References

33. Source: youtube.com
Title: Archival Evidence, MJ-12 Documents, and Government Records
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PeULVsP-jEQ

34. Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6fMNn4f07S8

35. Source: youtube.com
Title: A Secret History: Inside Shadow Intelligence, the MJ-12 Documents
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ogJplVuElLs

36. Source: youtube.com
Title: USA: UFO Anti-Secrecy Group Demonstration Over GAO Inquiry
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iuaLed7Jnu4

37. Source: nsa.gov
Link:https://www.nsa.gov/Helpful-Links/NSA-FOIA/Declassification-Transparency-Initiatives/FOIA-Reports-and-Releases/FOIA-Reports-and-Releases-List/igphoto/2002761373/

38. Source: nsa.gov
Link:https://www.nsa.gov/Press-Room/Digital-Media-Center/Document-Gallery/igphoto/2002761373/

39. Source: youtube.com
Title: The Roswell Incident and Government Inquiries Explained
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s1FsS-dPc0w

40. Source: studylib.net
Link:https://studylib.net/doc/9820999/2.-%25E2%2580%2593-birdplay.—wordpress.com

41. Source: ufoplanet.yolasite.com
Link:https://ufoplanet.yolasite.com/mj-12.php

42. Source: scribd.com
Link:https://www.scribd.com/document/706046693/Top-Secret