Within Air Force
Did AFOSI Ever Examine an Original MJ 12 Paper?
The released record describes circulating copies, leaving unresolved whether AFOSI ever conducted a physical examination of an original document.
On this page
- How copies entered the 1988 inquiry
- Why originals matter in document authentication
- What the public record leaves unresolved
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
There is no clear public evidence that the FBI or the Air Force Office of Special Investigations (AFOSI) ever physically examined an original paper version of the famous MJ-12 briefing document before declaring it fabricated in 1988. The surviving FBI file shows something narrower: AFOSI supplied the FBI with a copy of the purported document; the FBI asked whether it was genuinely classified; and AFOSI later advised that it was fabricated. The released record does not describe laboratory examination of original paper, ink, typewriting or other physical features.[FBI]vault.fbi.govMajestic 12 Part 1 of 1Majestic 12 Part 1 of 1…
That distinction matters. An investigation can identify a document as bogus through archival contradictions, classification procedures, provenance checks or comparison with genuine records without possessing the original sheet of paper. But it cannot perform the full range of physical document-authentication tests on a photocopy. The public record therefore supports the Air Force’s conclusion, while leaving an important methodological question unanswered: exactly what evidence AFOSI used to reach it.
How copies entered the 1988 inquiry
The surviving FBI paperwork describes a chain involving reproductions rather than an authenticated original. On 15 September 1988, an AFOSI special agent contacted the FBI’s Dallas office concerning the MJ-12 material. The FBI’s 25 October communication called what it had received a “possible classified document” and asked headquarters to determine whether it remained classified. The FBI file itself contains reproduced pages of the purported 1952 briefing.[FBI]vault.fbi.govMajestic 12 Part 1 of 1Majestic 12 Part 1 of 1…
This fits the unusual provenance of the briefing document outside government. The version publicised by Jaime Shandera, William Moore and Stanton Friedman did not emerge as a stack of 1952 government papers with a documented chain of custody. Shandera reportedly received an anonymous package in December 1984 containing undeveloped 35 mm film; when developed, the film contained images of the purported Eisenhower briefing material. In other words, even the researchers who introduced the document to public attention were dealing principally with photographic images rather than demonstrably original 1950s paper.[WikiDisc]wikidisc.orgWiki Disc Majestic 12 documents | Wiki DiscMajestic 12 documents | WikiDiscJuly 1, 2026…
That provenance sharply limits what can be inferred from the FBI’s possession of a “document”. In ordinary language, an investigative file may call a photocopy or photographic reproduction a document without implying possession of the physical artefact supposedly created in 1952. Nothing visible in the released 1988 FBI correspondence establishes that AFOSI obtained the sheets from which the anonymously mailed film had originally been photographed.
The FBI’s immediate concern also explains why physical authentication may not have been its priority. Dallas was investigating a possible disclosure of classified information, not initially commissioning a historical forgery examination. Its explicit request was for headquarters to determine the document’s classification status; Dallas said it would hold further investigation in abeyance pending that answer.[FBI]vault.fbi.govMajestic 12 Part 1 of 1Majestic 12 Part 1 of 1…
What AFOSI actually told the FBI
The decisive statement came at the end of November. A 2 December 1988 FBI communication records that AFOSI had advised the Bureau on 30 November that the document “was fabricated”. It added that copies had been distributed around the United States and called the document “completely bogus”, after which Dallas was instructed to close the investigation.[Cufon]cufon.orgFBI REACTION TO "MJ-12 BRIEFING PAPERFBI REACTION TO "MJ-12 BRIEFING PAPER"…
What the released file does not provide is equally important. It does not preserve a publicly readable AFOSI forensic report identifying an original specimen, recording its chain of custody or describing tests of its physical characteristics. There is no visible account of paper-fibre examination, watermark analysis, ink dating, typewriter identification or inspection of original impressions. Nor does the FBI communication explain the evidential steps behind AFOSI’s finding. The surviving paperwork records the answer far more clearly than the method.[FBI]vault.fbi.govMajestic 12 Part 1 of 1Majestic 12 Part 1 of 1…
That makes the safest formulation narrower than saying investigators “forensically tested the MJ-12 document and proved it fake”. The record establishes that AFOSI determined the circulating material was fabricated and communicated that determination to the FBI. It does not establish, on the evidence currently public, that AFOSI reached the finding by physically testing an original briefing paper.
The distinction was still visible in later government work. In 1995 the US General Accounting Office, now the Government Accountability Office (GAO), reported that the Air Force, National Archives and Information Security Oversight Office knew the Majestic 12 material through written material submitted by non-governmental persons. GAO found no evidence that this material constituted genuine documents originating within the executive branch.[Government Accountability Office]gao.govGovernment Accountability Office[Comments on Majestic 12 Material] | U.S. GAOJuly 28, 1995… That supports the government’s negative assessment of MJ-12, but it is not evidence that AFOSI once possessed the supposed 1952 original.
Why an original would have mattered
A photocopy can reveal a surprising amount. Investigators can compare wording, names, dates, formatting, security markings and administrative practices against known government records. They can search archives for the alleged programme, check whether the named officials were where the document says they were, and determine whether terminology existed at the claimed date. Those methods can expose serious authenticity problems without access to original paper.
An original, however, opens another evidential layer. A questioned-document examiner could potentially study the paper itself, its watermark and manufacture; determine whether ink or toner is compatible with the claimed period; inspect typewriter strikes and ribbon characteristics; distinguish an original typescript from a later reproduction; and examine alterations, pasted material or mechanical reproduction that may disappear or become ambiguous through successive photographic generations.
The importance of this distinction is illustrated by a different MJ-12-related item: the Cutler-Twining memorandum held by the National Archives. Unlike the anonymously circulated briefing-paper images, that sheet could actually be examined as a physical archival object. The National Archives reports that a conservation specialist examined its paper and identified it as a ribbon copy on “diction onionskin”. Archivists then compared it with representative Cutler papers, noting discrepancies involving paper, watermarks, filing and other administrative features.[National Archives]archives.govNational Archives Project BLUE BOOKNational ArchivesProject BLUE BOOK - Unidentified Flying Objects | National Archives…
That does not authenticate the Cutler-Twining memorandum — the National Archives expressly says that certification of a copy is not authentication of a document’s contents — but it demonstrates what becomes possible when investigators possess a physical sheet rather than a photographic reproduction.[National Archives]archives.govNational Archives Project BLUE BOOKNational ArchivesProject BLUE BOOK - Unidentified Flying Objects | National Archives… The publicly documented 1988 AFOSI treatment of the Eisenhower briefing paper does not show an equivalent physical examination.
Copies could still be tested against history
The absence of a documented original does not mean the 1988 conclusion necessarily depended on guesswork. Authenticity has two different dimensions: physical authenticity and historical or administrative consistency. An original is especially valuable for the first; substantial evidence for the second can be assembled from copies.
Federal archival searches produced precisely that sort of evidence. The National Archives searched Air Force, Joint Chiefs of Staff and National Security Council holdings, while the Truman and Eisenhower presidential libraries searched their collections. Those searches failed to locate the documentary trail that would ordinarily be expected around an actual MJ-12 organisation, apart from the anomalous Cutler-Twining memorandum itself.[National Archives]archives.govNational Archives Project BLUE BOOKNational ArchivesProject BLUE BOOK - Unidentified Flying Objects | National Archives…
The National Archives also identified specific problems surrounding that memorandum. It lacked the Top Secret register number expected for the series in which it appeared; no accompanying MJ-12 documents were found in its folder; searches of National Security Council meeting records produced no MJ-12 reference; and Robert Cutler was overseas when the memorandum attributed to him was dated. The Archives additionally reported that the security marking “Top Secret Restricted Information” was not used by the NSC during the Eisenhower administration.[National Archives]archives.govNational Archives Project BLUE BOOKNational ArchivesProject BLUE BOOK - Unidentified Flying Objects | National Archives…
These are provenance and historical-consistency findings rather than laboratory tests. They show why “no original was physically tested” and “there was no basis for doubting MJ-12” are not equivalent propositions. A document can fail authentication because the institutional record around it does not behave like the record of a genuine government document.
GAO’s later review reinforced that point. It reported that searches at federal libraries found neither documents fitting the claimed MJ-12 description nor corroborating references, and that agencies had no evidence that the circulating material actually originated in the executive branch.[Government Accountability Office]gao.govGovernment Accountability Office[Comments on Majestic 12 Material] | U.S. GAOJuly 28, 1995…
What the public record leaves unresolved
The central uncertainty is therefore methodological rather than simply a dispute over the word “fake”. The public record answers one question quite firmly and another only weakly.
What is documented: AFOSI had access to circulating MJ-12 material, the FBI received a copy, and on 30 November 1988 AFOSI told the FBI that the document was fabricated. The FBI then closed its Dallas inquiry.[FBI]vault.fbi.govMajestic 12 Part 1 of 1Majestic 12 Part 1 of 1…
What is not documented: the released FBI record does not demonstrate that AFOSI obtained the physical source paper behind the 35 mm images, subjected such an original to forensic examination, or produced a surviving public laboratory report detailing tests of paper, ink or typewriting.
There is also secondary evidence pointing directly at this limitation, although it should be treated more cautiously than the government records. Notes now available in a collection associated with the later Air Force Roswell investigation report that an Air Force official said the FBI could not perform forensic testing because it did not possess the original.[Project Aquarius]projectaquarius.mufon.comWEAVER COL RL 1993 LTRProject AquariusMSI PATCH SHEETJanuary 2, 2026… That statement is consistent with what is missing from the FBI file, but it is not itself the original 1988 AFOSI case record.
This leaves a meaningful but limited evidential gap. It weakens any claim that the 1988 determination represented a complete physical forensic authentication exercise. It does not, by itself, reverse the determination or establish that the MJ-12 briefing was genuine. Physical testing is only one route to detecting a false historical document, and subsequent government archival work found no corroborating executive-branch record for the alleged MJ-12 material.[Government Accountability Office]gao.govGovernment Accountability Office[Comments on Majestic 12 Material] | U.S. GAOJuly 28, 1995…
The most defensible answer
On the presently available public record, there is no demonstrated AFOSI or FBI physical examination of an original MJ-12 Eisenhower briefing paper. What investigators demonstrably handled in the 1988 inquiry were circulating copies, and the released FBI material records AFOSI’s judgement that the document was fabricated without preserving the detailed analysis behind that judgement.[FBI]vault.fbi.govMajestic 12 Part 1 of 1Majestic 12 Part 1 of 1…
The one important qualification is that “original MJ-12 document” can refer to different items. The National Archives does possess the physical Cutler-Twining memorandum discovered in its files, and its paper was examined by a conservation specialist. That is a genuine physical artefact in National Archives custody — meaning the sheet itself is there — but the Archives explicitly does not thereby certify that the memorandum was genuinely created by Cutler or that MJ-12 existed. Its provenance and historical inconsistencies remain substantial.[National Archives]archives.govNational Archives Project BLUE BOOKNational ArchivesProject BLUE BOOK - Unidentified Flying Objects | National Archives…
For the famous 1952 briefing paper at the heart of the 1988 Air Force fake-document determination, however, the evidential trail leads back to photographs, reproductions and circulating copies. Until an AFOSI report or comparable primary record surfaces documenting possession and physical testing of the source sheets, describing the 1988 finding as an examination of an “original MJ-12 document” goes beyond what the released evidence supports.
Amazon book picks
Further Reading
Books and field guides related to Did AFOSI Ever Examine an Original MJ 12 Paper?. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.
Top Secret/Majic: Operation Majestic-12 and the United States...
Top Secret/Majic is the result of nuclear physicist and renowned UFO investigator Stanton T. Friedman's twenty-one year search for the tr...
The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark
Rating: 4.5/5 from 43 Google Books ratings
NEW YORK TIMES BESTSELLER • From the renowned astronomer and author of Cosmos comes a “powerful [and] stirring defense of informed ration...
Forensic Document Examination: Principles and Practice
This book introduces the reader to the basic principles of handwriting and the factors that affect their development. The book discusses...
Archives: Principles and Practices
This new and extensively revised second edition offers an international perspective on archives management, providing authoritative guida...
eBay marketplace picks
Marketplace Samples
Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.
Selected fromUFO poster oneBay.co.uk.
Endnotes
1.
Source: vault.fbi.gov
Title: Majestic 12 Part 1 of 1
Link:https://vault.fbi.gov/Majestic%2012/Majestic%2012%20Part%2001%20%28Final%29/
Source snippet
Majestic 12 Part 1 of 1...
2.
Source: cufon.org
Title: FBI REACTION TO “MJ-12 BRIEFING PAPER”
Link:https://www.cufon.org/cufon/mj12_fbi.htm
Source snippet
FBI REACTION TO "MJ-12 BRIEFING PAPER"...
3.
Source: wikidisc.org
Title: Wiki Disc Majestic 12 documents | Wiki Disc
Link:https://www.wikidisc.org/wiki/Majestic_12_documents
Source snippet
Majestic 12 documents | WikiDiscJuly 1, 2026...
Published: July 1, 2026
4.
Source: gao.gov
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/154832
Source snippet
Government Accountability Office[Comments on Majestic 12 Material] | U.S. GAOJuly 28, 1995...
Published: July 28, 1995
5.
Source: archives.gov
Title: National Archives Project BLUE BOOK
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/military/air-force/ufos
Source snippet
National ArchivesProject BLUE BOOK - Unidentified Flying Objects | National Archives...
6.
Source: wikidisc.org
Title: Aquarius Teletype | Wiki Disc
Link:https://www.wikidisc.org/wiki/Aquarius_Teletype
7.
Source: wikidisc.org
Title: Special Operations Manual (SOM1-01) | Wiki Disc
Link:https://www.wikidisc.org/wiki/Special_Operations_Manual_%28SOM1-01%29
8.
Source: wikidisc.org
Title: [Burned memo]({{ ‘burned-memo/’ | relative_url }}) | Wiki Disc
Link:https://www.wikidisc.org/wiki/Burned_memo
9.
Source: wikidisc.org
Title: Nathan F. Twining | Wiki Disc
Link:https://www.wikidisc.org/wiki/Nathan_F._Twining
10.
Source: archives.gov
Title: JF K Assassination Records
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/release-2017-2018?order=Record+Num&p=&page=571&sort=desc
11.
Source: archives.gov
Title: JF K Assassination Records
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/release-2017-2018?mobile=&order=Record+Num&page=520&sort=asc
12.
Source: archives.gov
Title: JF K Assassination Records
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/release-2017-2018?order=Agency&origen=app&page=212&sort=asc
13.
Source: archives.gov
Title: JF K Assassination Records
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/release-2017-2018?order=Originator&p=&page=487&sort=asc
14.
Source: archives.gov
Title: JF K Assassination Records
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/release-2022?order=Doc+Date&page=204&s=03&sort=asc
15.
Source: archives.gov
Title: JF K Assassination Records
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/release-2022?order=Num+Pages&page=162&s=09&sort=desc
16.
Source: archives.gov
Title: JF K Assassination Records
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/release-2022?order=Record+Series&page=75&s=08&sort=desc
17.
Source: archives.gov
Title: JF K Assassination Records
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/release-2017-2018?order=Agency&p=&page=890&sort=desc
18.
Source: archives.gov
Title: JF K Assassination Records
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/release-2017-2018?order=Agency&page=977&sort=desc
19.
Source: archives.gov
Title: JF K Assassination Records
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/release-2017-2018?new=&order=Record+Series&page=592&sort=asc
20.
Source: archives.gov
Title: Townhouse Investigation | National Archives
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/investigations/watergate/townhouse-investigation.html
21.
Source: gao.gov
Title: nsiad 95 187
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/nsiad
22.
Source: gao.gov
Title: b 235431.8
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/b-235431.8
23.
Source: gao.gov
Title: b 260126.2
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/b-260126.2
24.
Source: gao.gov
Title: b 258537.7
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/b-258537.7
25.
Source: gao.gov
Title: rced 95 102
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/rced
26.
Source: gao.gov
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/b-259866%2Cb-259866.2
27.
Source: gao.gov
Title: b 257939.5
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/b-257939.5
28.
Source: gao.gov
Title: afmd 93 19
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/afmd
29.
Source: gao.gov
Title: nsiad 93 127
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/nsiad
30.
Source: cufon.org
Title: The Ice Documents Press Conference
Link:https://www.cufon.org/cufon/presconf.htm
31.
Source: vault.fbi.gov
Link:https://vault.fbi.gov/search?SearchableText=Majestic
32.
Source: vault.fbi.gov
Link:https://vault.fbi.gov/search?created%3Adate%3Alist=1970%2F02%2F01%3A00%3A00+US%2FEastern&created_usage=range%3Amin&portal_type%3Alist=ATFile&portal_type%3Alist=ATImage&portal_type%3Alist=Document&portal_type%3Alist=Event&portal_type%3Alist=FDPS&portal_type%3Alist=Favorite&portal_type%3Alist=File&portal_type%3Alist=Folder&portal_type%3Alist=Image&portal_type%3Alist=Large+Plone+Folder&portal_type%3Alist=Link&portal_type%3Alist=News+Item&portal_type%3Alist=Topic&pt_toggle=%23&submit=Search
33.
Source: vault.fbi.gov
Link:https://vault.fbi.gov/search?SearchableText=Name
34.
Source: vault.fbi.gov
Link:https://vault.fbi.gov/unexplained-phenomenon//search
35.
Source: vault.fbi.gov
Title: search?SearchableText=robert&b start:int=3390
Link:https://vault.fbi.gov/search%3FSearchableText%3Drobert%26b_start%3Aint%3D3390
36.
Source: vault.fbi.gov
Title: alphabetical listing collection
Link:https://vault.fbi.gov/alphabetical-listing-collection/?b_start%3Aint=1100
37.
Source: vault.fbi.gov
Link:https://vault.fbi.gov/search?SearchableText=Unknown&b_start%3Aint=630
38.
Source: vault.fbi.gov
Link:https://vault.fbi.gov/search?SearchableText=Aircraft+Commander
39.
Source: vault.fbi.gov
Link:https://vault.fbi.gov/search?SearchableText=robert&b_start%3Aint=2430
40.
Source: vault.fbi.gov
Link:https://vault.fbi.gov/search?SearchableText=a
41.
Source: vault.fbi.gov
Title: search?SearchableText=robert&b start:int=1740
Link:https://vault.fbi.gov/search%3FSearchableText%3Drobert%26b_start%3Aint%3D1740
42.
Source: vault.fbi.gov
Link:https://vault.fbi.gov/search?SearchableText=robert&b_start%3Aint=2670
43.
Source: vault.fbi.gov
Link:https://vault.fbi.gov/search?SearchableText=Unknown&b_start%3Aint=660
44.
Source: vault.fbi.gov
Link:https://vault.fbi.gov/browse-files-list/search
45.
Source: vault.fbi.gov
Link:https://vault.fbi.gov/all-files/search
46.
Source: vault.fbi.gov
Link:https://vault.fbi.gov/all-files//search
47.
Source: vault.fbi.gov
Link:https://vault.fbi.gov/browse-files-list//search
48.
Source: vault.fbi.gov
Link:https://vault.fbi.gov/Majestic%2012/Majestic%2012%20Part%2001%20%28Final%29/view
49.
Source: cufon.org
Link:https://www.cufon.org/cufon/marshall.htm
50.
Source: files.gao.gov
Link:https://files.gao.gov/gao-01-1012sp/zNM.html
51.
Source: files.gao.gov
Link:https://files.gao.gov/gao-01-1012sp/NM.html
52.
Source: wikidisc.org
Title: [Hillenkoetter]({{ ‘hillenkoetter/’ | relative_url }}) memo to Joint Intelligence Committee | Wiki Disc
Link:https://www.wikidisc.org/wiki/Hillenkoetter_memo_to_Joint_Intelligence_Committee
53.
Source: noufors.com
Link:https://noufors.com/majestic-12.htm
Source snippet
Majestic-12...
54.
Source: projectaquarius.mufon.com
Title: WEAVER COL RL 1993 LTR
Link:https://projectaquarius.mufon.com/wp-content/uploads/pcg-bill-moore-files-collection/WEAVER-COL-RL-1993LTR.pdf
Source snippet
Project AquariusMSI PATCH SHEETJanuary 2, 2026...
Published: January 2, 2026
55.
Source: en.ikwipedia.org
Title: Majestic 12
Link:https://en.ikwipedia.org/wiki/Majestic_12
56.
Source: science.howstuffworks.com
Title: majestic 12
Link:https://science.howstuffworks.com/space/aliens-ufos/majestic-12.htm
57.
Source: odla.fr
Title: MAJESTI C 12
Link:https://www.odla.fr/2021/10/07/majestic-12/
58.
Source: lurch2.blogspot.com
Title: majestic 12
Link:https://lurch2.blogspot.com/2013/09/majestic-12.html
59.
Source: bibliotecapleyades.net
Title: The Majestic 12
Link:https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_mj12_19.htm
60.
Source: ro.scribd.com
Link:https://ro.scribd.com/document/472644084/196986
61.
Source: scribd.com
Link:https://www.scribd.com/document/346323384/majestic12-1
62.
Source: sacred-texts.com
Link:https://sacred-texts.com/ufo/mj12_04.htm
63.
Source: ufo.fandom.com
Title: Majestic 12
Link:https://ufo.fandom.com/wiki/Majestic_12
64.
Source: ordoabchao.ca
Link:https://ordoabchao.ca/volume-five/disclosure
65.
Source: uapcodex.org
Title: majestic 12 documents
Link:https://uapcodex.org/cases/majestic-12-documents/
66.
Source: internationalflyingsaucerbureau.com
Title: Majestic 12
Link:https://www.internationalflyingsaucerbureau.com/majestic-12/
67.
Source: oig.justice.gov
Link:https://oig.justice.gov/archives/reports/ATF/a0530/findings.htm
68.
Source: kb42.info
Title: Project Aquarius Briefing Document
Link:https://kb42.info/index.php?title=Project_Aquarius_Briefing_Document
69.
Source: en.wikisource.org
Title: MJ 12 Document
Link:https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/MJ-12_Document
Additional References
70.
Source: pop-catastrophe.co.uk
Title: Updates > Current Month | Pop-Catastrophe.co.uk
Link:https://pop-catastrophe.co.uk/updates-current-month/
Source snippet
July 28, 2026 — Pussy Galore – Riverside, Newcastle, UK (10 February 1988) Pussy Galore – London School of Economics, London, UK (9 Febru...
Published: July 28, 2026
71.
Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ogJplVuElLs
Source snippet
Top Secret / MAJIC By Stanton T. Friedman - A Detailed Investigation into the MJ-12 UFO Documents...
72.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Top Secret / MAJIC By Stanton T. Friedman
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Je48I-xNjY
Source snippet
XZTV Special: Stanton Friedman - Operation MJ 12...
73.
Source: cia.gov
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/cia-rdp10-01569r000100010009-1
74.
Source: cia.gov
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/0001473498
75.
Source: cia.gov
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/cia-rdp80m01133a001000010003-4
76.
Source: cia.gov
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/cia-rdp75b00326r000200230028-9
77.
Source: youtube.com
Title: The FBI’s Majestic 12 Hoax Mystery
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=slGKwscUeiI
Source snippet
Majestic 12 documents Stanton Friedman XZTV Special: Stanton Friedman - Operation MJ 12...
78.
Source: cia.gov
Title: KE Y INTELLIGENCE QUESTIONS EVALUATION PROCESS (KEP) | CIA FOIA (foia.cia.gov)
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/cia-rdp82b00871r000100160003-2
79.
Source: wanttoknow.info
Link:https://www.wanttoknow.info/civillibertiesmediaarticles-0-100000