Within Chain of Custody
Does National Archives Custody Authenticate an MJ 12 Document?
A certified archive copy proves what was held and reproduced, not that the underlying MJ-12 document was genuine when it entered government files.
On this page
- What archival custody can establish
- What certification of a reproduction does not establish
- Why later custody cannot repair an undocumented earlier history
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
A National Archives-certified copy of an alleged MJ-12 document can establish an important but limited fact: the copy accurately reproduces a document that was in the National Archives and Records Administration’s custody. It does not establish that the underlying document was genuinely created by the White House, National Security Council, Air Force or any other office named or implied by it. On MJ-12, the National Archives has stated this distinction unusually explicitly: certification attests that a reproduction is a true copy of a document in its custody; the Archives does not thereby authenticate the document or the information it contains.[National Archives]archives.govNational Archives Project BLUE BOOKNational ArchivesProject BLUE BOOK - Unidentified Flying Objects | National ArchivesJune 25, 2024…
That distinction is central to the chain-of-custody debate because the best-known archival MJ-12 item, the 1954 Cutler-Twining memorandum, really was found among National Archives holdings. Yet NARA’s investigation identified anomalies in its filing context, classification markings and supposed historical circumstances. Archival custody therefore answers where the paper was found, not the harder question of how it entered the government record system and whether it was genuine when it did so.[National Archives]archives.govNational Archives Project BLUE BOOKNational ArchivesProject BLUE BOOK - Unidentified Flying Objects | National ArchivesJune 25, 2024…
What archival custody can establish
The concrete case is the one-page memorandum dated 14 July 1954, addressed to General Nathan Twining and attributed to Robert Cutler, President Dwight D. Eisenhower’s Special Assistant for National Security Affairs. Its subject line refers to an “NSC/MJ-12 Special Studies Project”. Unlike the famous MJ-12 briefing papers that surfaced outside government archives, this document was located within federal holdings: NARA says it was found in Record Group 341, entry 267, in folder T4-1846.[National Archives]archives.govNational Archives Project BLUE BOOKNational ArchivesProject BLUE BOOK - Unidentified Flying Objects | National ArchivesJune 25, 2024…
That fact has genuine evidential value. It means the debate is not simply about a privately circulated photocopy whose claimed archival location cannot be checked. NARA can identify the physical item it holds, its record group and its folder. A researcher obtaining a certified reproduction can consequently establish that the reproduced text corresponds to the document held there. NARA’s 1987 MJ-12 reference report itself survives in federal archival holdings, including a copy available through the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library.[Ronald Reagan Presidential Library]reaganlibrary.archives.govRonald Reagan Presidential LibraryRonald Reagan Presidential LibraryNovember 1, 2025…
But “found in a federal record group” and “created as an authentic federal record” are different propositions. NARA’s own archival terminology defines provenance partly as information about a record’s chain of ownership and custody. Its principles of arrangement stress that records gain meaning from their relationship to the agency and filing system in which they accumulated: preserving original order helps protect evidence of their origins and the processes that produced them.[National Archives]archives.govNational ArchivesArchives and Records Management Resources | National ArchivesAugust 15, 2016…
That distinction is especially important with a single loose document. NARA’s records-management guidance notes more generally that mere location within an agency does not by itself determine the status of material; institutional control, purpose and the circumstances in which material was created or maintained also matter. In other words, physical presence is evidence of custody, but custody is not a substitute for evidence of creation.[National Archives]archives.govNational ArchivesIdentification of Records, Nonrecord Materials, and Personal Papers | National ArchivesJune 6, 2019…
For the Cutler-Twining memorandum, the most defensible inference from archival custody is therefore narrow: by the time researchers encountered it, the document was physically associated with a body of Air Force records that came into National Archives custody. That is stronger than having no known archival location at all. It does not independently establish who typed the sheet, when it was inserted into the files or whether it belonged there from the 1950s onward.
Why a certified reproduction is not authentication
The potentially confusing word is certified. In ordinary speech, a “certified National Archives copy” can sound like a government endorsement of the original document’s genuineness. NARA uses certification more narrowly.
Its MJ-12 reference report states that, when it certifies a document under the National Archives seal, it is attesting that the reproduction is a true copy of a document in its custody. It immediately adds that it does not authenticate either documents or the information contained in them.[National Archives]archives.govNational Archives Project BLUE BOOKNational ArchivesProject BLUE BOOK - Unidentified Flying Objects | National ArchivesJune 25, 2024…
That produces three distinct questions that should not be collapsed into one:
- Is the reproduction faithful? A NARA certification can attest that the supplied reproduction accurately represents the document in NARA’s custody.
- Was that document actually in NARA’s custody? Its archival location and reference information can establish that.
- Was the document genuinely produced by the office and official named on it at the claimed date? Certification of the reproduction does not answer this question.
The distinction is not peculiar to MJ-12. NARA has described certification elsewhere as affixing a certificate, ribbon and seal attesting that a copy is a true copy of material in its holdings. The function is fundamentally about the relationship between the archive’s holdings and the reproduction supplied to the requester.[National Archives]archives.govNational Archives DocumentNational ArchivesDocumentMay 27, 2026…
That matters because otherwise certification can create a misleading evidential loop. Suppose an unauthenticated sheet enters a government file at some unknown date. Decades later, the file reaches an archive. The archive faithfully preserves the sheet and later supplies a certified reproduction. The certification can prove that the modern copy matches the archived sheet. It cannot retrospectively prove that the sheet was legitimately created and filed decades earlier.
In the MJ-12 case, this is not merely a theoretical caution. NARA itself drew attention to features of the Cutler-Twining memorandum that make its relationship to the surrounding official records problematic.[National Archives]archives.govNational Archives Project BLUE BOOKNational ArchivesProject BLUE BOOK - Unidentified Flying Objects | National ArchivesJune 25, 2024…
The Cutler-Twining memo does not fit its archival surroundings cleanly
If archival location alone authenticated the memorandum, the National Archives’ subsequent investigation would have been unnecessary. Instead, archivists examined whether the document behaved like an authentic member of the record series in which it appeared. Several findings weakened that inference.
Most importantly, Record Group 341, entry 267 was filed according to Top Secret register numbers, yet the Cutler-Twining memorandum had no such number. The folder contained no other document concerning “NSC/MJ-12”. Searches of records of the Secretary of Defense, Joint Chiefs of Staff, Headquarters US Air Force and related files produced no supporting information, while enquiries to the Air Force, Joint Chiefs and National Security Council likewise failed to produce corroboration.[National Archives]archives.govNational Archives Project BLUE BOOKNational ArchivesProject BLUE BOOK - Unidentified Flying Objects | National ArchivesJune 25, 2024…
That is an archival-context problem, not simply an argument about how the document looks. The National Archives’ own explanation of provenance says that the arrangement inherited from a creating agency helps preserve the relationship between records and the activities that produced them. Related registers, indexes, folders and neighbouring documents can therefore provide evidence that an item participated in the records system it purports to come from.[National Archives]archives.govOpen source on archives.gov.
For the MJ-12 memorandum, those expected relationships are unusually weak. It exists in the archive, but its expected Top Secret register number is missing and the surrounding folder does not develop the supposed MJ-12 subject. The archival setting consequently proves less than it might have if the memorandum were accompanied by registration entries, routing slips, related correspondence and independently generated records referring to the same project.
NARA found further contextual problems. The memorandum carries the classification wording “Top Secret Restricted Information”; according to information NARA obtained from the National Security Council’s Freedom of Information Office, that marking did not come into NSC use until the Nixon administration. The Eisenhower Presidential Library likewise reported that the marking was not used during Eisenhower’s administration.[National Archives]archives.govNational Archives Project BLUE BOOKNational ArchivesProject BLUE BOOK - Unidentified Flying Objects | National ArchivesJune 25, 2024…
The physical comparison was also inconclusive at best. NARA reported that the sheet lacked official government letterhead or a watermark and that a conservation specialist identified it as a ribbon copy on “diction onionskin”. A representative sample of Cutler’s NSC papers at the Eisenhower Library showed different patterns of paper and watermark use, with most outgoing NSC documents prepared on White House letterhead. None of those observations is made irrelevant simply because the disputed sheet later resided in an official archive.[National Archives]archives.govNational Archives Project BLUE BOOKNational ArchivesProject BLUE BOOK - Unidentified Flying Objects | National ArchivesJune 25, 2024…
The expected 1954 paper trail is missing
The custody-versus-authentication distinction becomes sharper when the memorandum’s claimed event is checked against independent government records.
The Cutler-Twining text refers to an MJ-12 briefing that was supposedly to occur during an already scheduled White House meeting on 16 July 1954. Yet NARA reported that its search of the official National Security Council meeting-minute files found no NSC meeting on that date and no reference to MJ-12 or Majestic anywhere in the July 1954 NSC minutes. Searches of NSC indexes for MJ-12, Majestic and several UFO-related terms were also negative.[National Archives]archives.govNational Archives Project BLUE BOOKNational ArchivesProject BLUE BOOK - Unidentified Flying Objects | National ArchivesJune 25, 2024…
The Eisenhower Presidential Library added another check. Eisenhower’s appointment books contained no entry for a special 16 July meeting that might have involved an MJ-12 briefing. The library noted that even “off the record” meetings generated appointment-book entries recording their time and participants. It also reported that the NSC declassification office had no record of declassification action concerning this memorandum or other records of the alleged project.[National Archives]archives.govNational Archives Project BLUE BOOKNational ArchivesProject BLUE BOOK - Unidentified Flying Objects | National ArchivesJune 25, 2024…
There was an additional problem with the attributed author. NARA established from Eisenhower administration records that Robert Cutler was travelling through military installations in Europe and North Africa from 3 to 15 July 1954. He was therefore overseas on 14 July, the date of the memorandum attributed to him. NARA also located Cutler’s instructions assigning NSC administrative matters to subordinates during his absence and observed that, if a genuine memorandum had needed to be issued during that period, one would expect one of those officials to have signed it.[National Archives]archives.govNational Archives Project BLUE BOOKNational ArchivesProject BLUE BOOK - Unidentified Flying Objects | National ArchivesJune 25, 2024…
None of these findings mathematically proves when or by whom the sheet was created. Their importance is narrower and more directly relevant to authentication: the archival system surrounding the document does not supply the independent administrative traces expected to turn simple custody into strong evidence of official origin.
Why later custody cannot repair an undocumented earlier history
An archive can preserve a chain of custody from the point at which it assumes control of material. It cannot automatically reconstruct a missing chain from before that point.
This is the central governance problem in applying archival evidence to MJ-12. The National Archives exists to preserve and provide access to records, not to guarantee that every individual sheet encountered within transferred files was correctly created, filed and attributed at every previous stage. Indeed, archival practice depends heavily on provenance and original order precisely because the relationships among documents help reveal their origins and meaning. NARA notes that provenance protects the integrity of records by preserving evidence of the processes through which they came into existence; material separated from that context can lose much of its documentary significance.[National Archives]archives.govOpen source on archives.gov.
The Cutler-Twining memorandum illustrates the difference vividly. Once the disputed sheet is in NARA custody, a later researcher can obtain a reproduction and NARA can certify the relationship between that reproduction and its holdings. But the certificate does not answer the historical questions immediately preceding archival custody: Who created the sheet? Under what authority? Was it registered? When was it put into folder T4-1846? Was it there throughout the government’s active use of those files, or did it enter them later?
Without evidence resolving those questions, the document’s later presence in Record Group 341 cannot be projected backwards as proof of an unbroken official history.
This is why the missing register number is more significant than it may first appear. A register is part of the administrative machinery that can connect a sensitive document to contemporary government handling. A memorandum that bears the expected control identifier, appears in the corresponding register and is supported by related correspondence offers multiple independent links to its claimed origin. The MJ-12 sheet instead presents the reverse pattern: it was found in a series organised by Top Secret register number but lacks that number itself.[National Archives]archives.govNational Archives Project BLUE BOOKNational ArchivesProject BLUE BOOK - Unidentified Flying Objects | National ArchivesJune 25, 2024…
NARA’s custody actually sharpened the authentication problem
There is a useful irony in the archival history of the Cutler-Twining memorandum. Its discovery at the National Archives gave it a much stronger association with government records than the anonymously supplied MJ-12 briefing material enjoyed. Yet that same archival setting made detailed checking possible — and the checks exposed discrepancies.
Because the memorandum could be compared with its series, archivists could notice the missing register number. Because related NSC and presidential holdings survived, they could search the meeting minutes and appointment books. Because authentic Cutler papers existed, his whereabouts and office practices could be checked. Because NARA could consult the National Security Council and Eisenhower Library, the classification wording could be compared with historical usage.[National Archives]archives.govNational Archives Project BLUE BOOKNational ArchivesProject BLUE BOOK - Unidentified Flying Objects | National ArchivesJune 25, 2024…
The archive therefore functions here less as a stamp of authenticity than as an evidential testing environment. The existence of a disputed document in archival custody permits questions about its provenance to be investigated against the surrounding record system.
The US Government Accountability Office reinforced the broader distinction in 1995. After seeking agency views on MJ-12 material, GAO reported that the Information Security Oversight Office, Air Force and National Archives said their knowledge of Majestic 12 was limited to written material submitted by nongovernmental people, and that there was no evidence the material constituted actual documents originating in the executive branch. Federal libraries’ archivists had also found nothing matching the claimed MJ-12 material or references to it despite years of public enquiries.[Government Accountability Office]gao.govGovernment Accountability Office[Comments on Majestic 12 Material] | U.S. GAOGovernment Accountability Office[Comments on Majestic 12 Material] | U.S. GAO
That conclusion should not be misread as saying that no sheet bearing “MJ-12” ever existed in government custody. The Cutler-Twining sheet plainly did. The point is that custody of an object and evidence of its claimed governmental origin are separate evidential propositions.
What would bridge the gap from custody to proof?
For the National Archives connection to become substantially stronger evidence for an authentic MJ-12 programme, the important discovery would not simply be another certified copy of the same memorandum. What is missing is contemporaneous provenance.
A much stronger case would involve independently generated records that connect the disputed memorandum to normal 1954 government business: its missing Top Secret registry entry; a routing or receipt record; a contemporaneous file index; correspondence from another office acknowledging the memorandum; appointment or meeting records corresponding to the briefing it describes; or a documented transfer history demonstrating that the item was present in the relevant government file before the modern MJ-12 controversy began.
Such evidence would not automatically prove extraordinary claims made elsewhere in the alleged MJ-12 papers. It would answer the narrower authentication question: whether a particular MJ-12 record genuinely belonged to the mid-1950s federal records system it claims to represent.
Until such evidence appears, the National Archives’ own position supplies the clearest rule for interpreting the Cutler-Twining memorandum. The archive can certify the reproduction and its custody, while the document’s historical authenticity remains a separate question.[National Archives]archives.govNational Archives Project BLUE BOOKNational ArchivesProject BLUE BOOK - Unidentified Flying Objects | National ArchivesJune 25, 2024…
That boundary is not semantic hairsplitting. It is the point at which the MJ-12 chain of custody remains broken. Later archival possession can preserve an uncertain document faithfully; it cannot, by itself, transform an uncertain earlier provenance into an authenticated one.
Amazon book picks
Further Reading
Books and field guides related to Does National Archives Custody Authenticate an MJ 12 Document?. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.
Top Secret/Majic: Operation Majestic-12 and the United States...
Top Secret/Majic is the result of nuclear physicist and renowned UFO investigator Stanton T. Friedman's twenty-one year search for the tr...
Archives: Principles and Practices
This new and extensively revised second edition offers an international perspective on archives management, providing authoritative guida...
Forensic Document Examination: Principles and Practice
This book introduces the reader to the basic principles of handwriting and the factors that affect their development. The book discusses...
eBay marketplace picks
Marketplace Samples
Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.
Selected fromUFO poster oneBay.co.uk.
Endnotes
1.
Source: archives.gov
Title: National Archives Project BLUE BOOK
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/military/air-force/ufos
Source snippet
National ArchivesProject BLUE BOOK - Unidentified Flying Objects | National ArchivesJune 25, 2024...
Published: June 25, 2024
2.
Source: gao.gov
Title: Government Accountability Office[Comments on Majestic 12 Material] | U.S. GAO
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/154832
3.
Source: reaganlibrary.archives.gov
Link:https://reaganlibrary.archives.gov/public/2021-06/40-654-209237726-004-008-2021.pdf
Source snippet
Ronald Reagan Presidential LibraryRonald Reagan Presidential LibraryNovember 1, 2025...
Published: November 1, 2025
4.
Source: archives.gov
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/alic/reference/archives-resources/terminology.html
Source snippet
National ArchivesArchives and Records Management Resources | National ArchivesAugust 15, 2016...
Published: August 15, 2016
5.
Source: archives.gov
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/alic/reference/archives-resources/principles-of-arrangement.html
6.
Source: archives.gov
Link:https://www.archives.gov/records-mgmt/scheduling/id
Source snippet
National ArchivesIdentification of Records, Nonrecord Materials, and Personal Papers | National ArchivesJune 6, 2019...
Published: June 6, 2019
7.
Source: archives.gov
Title: National Archives Records Basics | National Archives
Link:https://www.archives.gov/records-mgmt/scheduling/basics
8.
Source: archives.gov
Title: National Archives Document
Link:https://www.archives.gov/files/comment/attachments/36-cfr-1258-prop.pdf
Source snippet
National ArchivesDocumentMay 27, 2026...
Published: May 27, 2026
9.
Source: archives.gov
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/alic/reference/archives-resources/archival-arrangement.html
10.
Source: archives.gov
Title: Record Values | National Archives
Link:https://www.archives.gov/records-mgmt/scheduling/values
11.
Source: archives.gov
Title: JF K Assassination Records
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/release-2022?order=Num+Pages&os=wtmbzegmu5hwref%3Dapp&page=25&sort=asc
12.
Source: archives.gov
Title: JF K Assassination Records
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/release-2022?order=Title&os=__&page=884&sort=asc
13.
Source: archives.gov
Title: JF K Assassination Records
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/release-2022?order=Title&page=199&sort=asc
14.
Source: archives.gov
Title: JF K Assassination Records
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/release-2022?order=NARA+Release+Date&search=werbell&sort=asc
15.
Source: archives.gov
Title: JF K Assassination Records
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/release-2022?order=Doc+Date&page=196&s=08&sort=desc
16.
Source: archives.gov
Title: JF K Assassination Records
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/release-2022?order=Record+Series&page=106&s=09&sort=desc
17.
Source: archives.gov
Title: JF K Assassination Records
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/release-2022?order=Title&page=884&s=09&sort=asc
18.
Source: archives.gov
Title: JF K Assassination Records
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/release-2022?order=NARA+Release+Date&os=ios&page=211&sort=asc
19.
Source: archives.gov
Title: General Note | National Archives
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/catalog/lcdrg/elements/general-note
20.
Source: archives.gov
Title: 9/11 Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Finding Aid
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/foia/faa-finding-aid
21.
Source: archives.gov
Title: Art Provenance and Claims Records and Research | National Archives
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/holocaust/art
22.
Source: archives.gov
Title: JF K Assassination Records
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/release-2021
23.
Source: archives.gov
Title: decision table fy2016 0
Link:https://www.archives.gov/declassification/iscap/decision-table-fy2016-0
24.
Source: archives.gov
Title: Records Management Guidance | National Archives
Link:https://www.archives.gov/guidance/records-management-guidance
25.
Source: archives.gov
Title: decision table fy2016
Link:https://www.archives.gov/declassification/iscap/decision-table-fy2016
26.
Source: archives.gov
Title: What’s a Record? | National Archives
Link:https://www.archives.gov/about/info/whats-a-record.html
27.
Source: archives.gov
Title: Federal Register Act | National Archives
Link:https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/laws/federal-register/1507.html
28.
Source: archives.gov
Title: Federal Register and the Code of Federal Regulations | National Archives
Link:https://www.archives.gov/about/laws/cfr.html
29.
Source: gao.gov
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/gao
30.
Source: archives.gov
Title: NAR A Guidance on Managing Web Records | National Archives
Link:https://www.archives.gov/records-mgmt/policy/managing-web-records.html
31.
Source: archives.gov
Link:https://www.archives.gov/records-mgmt/policy/protecting-federal-records.html
32.
Source: gao.gov
Title: nsiad 95 187
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/nsiad
33.
Source: gao.gov
Title: nsiad 95 95
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/nsiad
34.
Source: gao.gov
Title: nsiad 95 118
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/nsiad
35.
Source: gao.gov
Title: nsiad 95 140
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/nsiad
36.
Source: gao.gov
Title: osi 95 9
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/osi
37.
Source: gao.gov
Title: nsiad 95 56
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/nsiad
38.
Source: gao.gov
Title: nsiad 95 46
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/nsiad
39.
Source: gao.gov
Title: nsiad 94 155
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/nsiad
40.
Source: gao.gov
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/117661
41.
Source: gao.gov
Title: lcd 81 3
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/lcd
42.
Source: archive.org
Title: Full text of “Maji
Link:https://archive.org/stream/majiall337/Maji%20all_djvu.txt
43.
Source: archives.gov
Title: Executive Orders | National Archives
Link:https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/codification/executive-order/11030.html
44.
Source: founders.archives.gov
Link:https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Jefferson/03
45.
Source: founders.archives.gov
Link:https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Madison/02
46.
Source: founders.archives.gov
Link:https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Madison/02
47.
Source: founders.archives.gov
Link:https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Washington/05
48.
Source: founders.archives.gov
Link:https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Jefferson/01
49.
Source: founders.archives.gov
Link:https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Washington/05
50.
Source: founders.archives.gov
Link:https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Jefferson/01
51.
Source: founders.archives.gov
Link:https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Jefferson/01
52.
Source: founders.archives.gov
Link:https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Jay/01
53.
Source: founders.archives.gov
Link:https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Franklin/01
54.
Source: vault.fbi.gov
Title: Majestic 12
Link:https://vault.fbi.gov/Majestic%2012/?%24NMW_TRANS%24=ext
55.
Source: fo4b.dswd.gov.ph
Link:https://fo4b.dswd.gov.ph/faqs/travel-clearance-for-minors/
56.
Source: luforu.org
Title: [Cutler-Twining memo]({{ ‘cutler-memo/’ | relative_url }})
Link:https://luforu.org/cutler-twining-memo/
57.
Source: disclosdex.com
Title: Majestic 12 | Disclosdex
Link:https://disclosdex.com/organizations/majestic-12
Additional References
58.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Karl Pflock
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8g5tYfcQ9RQ
Source snippet
A secret history: Inside shadow intelligence, the MJ-12 documents | Reality Check...
59.
Source: youtube.com
Title: The MJ-12 Conspiracy Debunked
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9dF-iggJusY
Source snippet
"Majestic 12" National Archives Cutler Twining The Majestic-12 Documents [With Ryan S. Wood]...
60.
Source: scribd.com
Link:https://www.scribd.com/document/537464213/Robert-M-Wood-Mounting-Evidence-For-Authenticity-of-MJ-12-Documents-MUFON-2001
61.
Source: slideshare.net
Link:https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/kennedy-and-mj12part1/7093474
62.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/groups/2310238902685659/posts/2786923305017214/
63.
Source: usubjects.com
Link:https://usubjects.com/article/nara-report-revisits-issues-with-cutler-twining-memo-in-mj-12-documents-3109
64.
Source: scribd.com
Link:https://www.scribd.com/document/875558418/Project-BLUE-BOOK-Unidentified-Flying-Objects
65.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/groups/httpscollectivespark.xyz/posts/2151319962094522/
66.
Source: skepticalinquirer.org
Link:https://skepticalinquirer.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/29/2019/03/Issue-02-10.pdf
67.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/groups/lueelizondo/posts/1456630939842502/