Within Later Forgeries
Why Period Perfect Details No Longer Prove MJ 12
Once authentic documents were shown to be usable as forgery templates, correct names, terminology and signatures became much weaker signs of authenticity.
On this page
- Why period accuracy once seemed persuasive
- How historical templates reproduce authentic detail
- Which authenticity clues lose evidential weight
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
Period accuracy once looked like one of the stronger arguments for the alleged MJ-12 documents. A paper that used the right officials, plausible bureaucratic language, old-fashioned typography, genuine-looking signatures and obscure historical details could seem difficult for a modern hoaxer to manufacture. Some MJ-12 advocates explicitly treated such features as positive authentication evidence.[Majestic Documents]majesticdocuments.comSummary Arguments | Majestic DocumentsOctober 31, 2018…
Later exposed forgeries changed the significance of those clues. In material examined by MJ-12 defender Stanton Friedman, purported secret documents were found to be remodelled versions of genuine historical records: authentic prose, documentary structure and handwritten elements could be borrowed, altered and recombined. George C. Marshall Papers editor Larry Bland independently identified one supposed MJ-12 paper as a reworking of a real Marshall letter.[Cufon]cufon.orgFRAUDULENT 27-SEPTEMBER-1944 "MJ-12" DOCUMENT…
The lesson is narrower than “everything MJ-12 is therefore fake”, but important: period-perfect detail is no longer strong independent evidence of authenticity when the same detail can be obtained by copying authentic period sources.
Why period accuracy once seemed persuasive
The appeal of period accuracy is easy to understand. A fabricated 1940s or 1950s classified document has many opportunities to betray itself. A hoaxer can choose the wrong job title, use terminology that had not yet entered official usage, put an official in the wrong place, reproduce an impossible security marking, imitate the wrong typeface or give a historical figure language unlike anything in genuine correspondence.
Conversely, getting numerous small details right can look impressive. The pro-authenticity methodology published by the Majestic Documents project illustrates this reasoning. Its authentication material treats such characteristics as period typography, handwriting, correct formatting, literary style, historically appropriate facts and the absence of anachronisms as evidence that can raise a document’s authenticity rating. Its discussion of particular papers points, for example, to a “period manual typewriter”, apparent handwriting matches and language considered compatible with the attributed author.[Majestic Documents]majesticdocuments.comMajestic Documents Authenticity Ratings | Majestic DocumentsMajestic DocumentsAuthenticity Ratings | Majestic DocumentsOctober 29, 2018…
This was not an irrational test. Anachronisms really can expose fabricated historical documents. The National Archives’ examination of the Cutler-Twining memorandum, for instance, found several discrepancies with the surrounding archival record. The paper lacked the Top Secret register number expected in the series where it appeared; archivists found no accompanying MJ-12 documentation; and the National Security Council reported that one security marking on it did not come into use there until the Nixon administration. Robert Cutler was also abroad on the date attributed to the memorandum.[National Archives]archives.govNational Archives Project BLUE BOOKNational ArchivesProject BLUE BOOK - Unidentified Flying Objects | National ArchivesJune 25, 2024…
But there is an important asymmetry here. A demonstrable anachronism can be powerful negative evidence because a document supposedly created in 1947 cannot genuinely contain something introduced decades later. Correct period detail does not work in reverse with equal force. A modern maker can research what existed in 1947 and reproduce it.
That distinction became especially important once investigators found examples showing exactly how it could be done.
Historical documents became ready-made templates
The decisive problem was not simply that later MJ-12 papers contained mistakes. It was that some apparently convincing ones could be connected to genuine documents from which their authenticity cues had apparently been harvested.
One of the clearest cases concerned a purported 27 September 1947 communication involving General George C. Marshall and State Department official Carlisle Humelsine. Larry Bland, editor of The George C. Marshall Papers, recognised its language as deriving from an authentic Top Secret letter Marshall had sent to Republican presidential candidate Thomas Dewey on 27 September 1944. In the genuine letter, Marshall was trying to prevent public disclosure of American success in reading sensitive Japanese communications.[Cufon]cufon.orgFRAUDULENT 27-SEPTEMBER-1944 "MJ-12" DOCUMENT…
The relationship was much stronger than a general similarity of style. Bland wrote that the purported MJ-12 document had “lifted most of the language” from the Marshall-Dewey letter. Names, dates and subject matter had been changed so that prose originally concerning wartime code-breaking now appeared to concern “MAJIC”.[Cufon]cufon.orgFRAUDULENT 27-SEPTEMBER-1944 "MJ-12" DOCUMENT…
That example matters because the genuine letter supplied precisely the qualities that an authentication exercise might otherwise reward. Its wording really was Marshall-era wording. Its structure really did belong to high-level secret correspondence. The bureaucratic tone did not need to be invented or successfully imitated; it could simply be inherited from the source.
Bland also noted that the questionable material he had seen was generally well made. In his assessment, whoever produced it appeared to know what such records should look like and had done sufficient archival research to obtain appropriate signatures, letterheads and stamps. Yet the multiple-generation photocopies made conventional examination difficult.[Cufon]cufon.orgFRAUDULENT 27-SEPTEMBER-1944 "MJ-12" DOCUMENT…
That combination is particularly significant for MJ-12: apparently sophisticated period detail and poor provenance can coexist because the former may have been manufactured from genuine historical ingredients.
The forgery method explains the impressive details
Friedman’s own investigation of later papers associated with Timothy Cooper reached a similar conclusion. This is especially important because Friedman remained a prominent defender of the original MJ-12 documents; his identification of later fabrications therefore cannot simply be dismissed as an argument from someone who regarded the entire subject as fraudulent.
Friedman reported finding several genuine documents that had served as models for what he called “phony emulations”. Among his sources were Wedemeyer Reports and The American MAGIC, works containing historical documents relevant to senior military officials and wartime intelligence. He described a straightforward process: retype an existing document on an old typewriter, alter selected details, preserve or reproduce handwritten material through scanning or photocopying, and combine the pieces into a new document.[Medium]medium.comUPDATE ON OPERATION MAJESTIC 12 DOCUMENTS | by Richard Geldreich, Jr. | Physicist Stanton Friedman’s Articles | MediumJune 28, 2024…
The Marshall-Humelsine example shows why this method is more damaging to the “period accuracy” argument than an ordinary hoax would be. A forger starting from a blank sheet must recreate the historical environment. A template-based forger starts with the historical environment already embedded in the source.
The genuine document can supply:
- period vocabulary and sentence construction, because the prose was actually written at the time;
- the habits of a particular official, because the template may genuinely have originated with that official or office;
- documentary structure and bureaucratic rhythm, rather than a modern imitation of them;
- real names, offices and institutional relationships that can be retained or selectively modified;
- signatures and handwritten elements, which can be photographically transplanted;
- typographical ageing, if an old typewriter is used for retyping and the result is repeatedly photocopied.
The resulting paper can therefore pass numerous superficial “does this look historical?” tests without being historical at all.[Cufon]cufon.orgFRAUDULENT 27-SEPTEMBER-1944 "MJ-12" DOCUMENT…
The mechanism also explains an otherwise puzzling feature of sophisticated historical forgeries: they can be extremely accurate in one dimension and absurd in another. Bland found that the supposed Marshall-Humelsine document contained authentic-looking elements but got Marshall’s personal behaviour wrong. Addressing Humelsine as “Carl” did not fit Marshall’s known habits, and the borrowed scenario in which Marshall supposedly could not safely meet Humelsine made little sense because Humelsine had served closely with him.[Cufon]cufon.orgFRAUDULENT 27-SEPTEMBER-1944 "MJ-12" DOCUMENT…
In other words, copying can preserve the surface while destroying the original context. That makes contextual consistency more informative than merely counting correct-looking details.
A genuine signature can actually be evidence of copying
Signatures illustrate the same evidential reversal particularly clearly. At first sight, a signature closely matching verified examples from the relevant official seems helpful to authentication. But an extremely close match can indicate the opposite.
The dispute over Harry Truman’s signature on the purported 24 September 1947 Truman-Forrestal memorandum provides an early MJ-12 example. Philip Klass located an authentic Truman communication to Vannevar Bush dated 1 October 1947 whose signature corresponded extraordinarily closely to the signature on the alleged MJ-12 memorandum. Questioned-document examiner Peter Tytell concluded that the MJ-12 example was a pasted-on photocopy of the genuine signature. The comparison reportedly included matching incidental pen marks, not merely Truman’s normal letter forms.[Center for Inquiry]cdn.centerforinquiry.orgCenter for Inquiry SUN #58S KEPTICS UFO NEWSLETTER By Philip J. KlDecember 6, 2024…
MJ-12 advocates disputed the inference, including whether the signatures were truly identical and whether an autopen could explain the resemblance. Friedman continued to reject the case that the original Truman-Forrestal memorandum had thereby been proved fraudulent.[Medium]medium.comUPDATE ON OPERATION MAJESTIC 12 DOCUMENTS | by Richard Geldreich, Jr. | Physicist Stanton Friedman’s Articles | MediumJune 28, 2024…
For the narrower issue of period accuracy, however, the important point does not depend on resolving every part of that dispute. Later acknowledged emulations demonstrated the underlying technique independently. Bland found that the Marshall signature on the fraudulent 1947 paper he examined was genuine in origin: he identified it as one of the autopen versions used by Marshall’s staff and suggested photocopying as the obvious means by which it reached the false document.[Cufon]cufon.orgFRAUDULENT 27-SEPTEMBER-1944 "MJ-12" DOCUMENT…
Thus “the signature is authentic” and “the document is authentic” are separate propositions. Once copying and compositing are realistic possibilities, an authentic signature may authenticate only the source from which the image was taken.
Obscure facts are weaker when archival research can supply them
A related MJ-12 argument has been that obscure or little-known historical facts embedded in a document would have been difficult for a forger to discover. The Majestic Documents project has explicitly treated “scarcely known facts” and similar historical matches as evidence favouring authenticity.[Majestic Documents]majesticdocuments.comMajestic Documents Authentication Articles | Majestic DocumentsMajestic Documents Authentication Articles | Majestic Documents
The later emulations substantially weaken that inference because their production itself appears to have depended on historical research. Bland judged that their maker knew how official documents should appear and had conducted enough research to obtain suitable signatures, letterheads and stamps. The genuine Marshall document used as one template was not inaccessible: Bland noted that it had first been published in the Pearl Harbor hearings collection in 1946 and had appeared several times thereafter.[Cufon]cufon.orgFRAUDULENT 27-SEPTEMBER-1944 "MJ-12" DOCUMENT…
Friedman’s discoveries reinforce the point. He found source material in published historical works available in a university library, including Wedemeyer Reports and The American MAGIC. Several purported MJ-12 documents could be related to material in those sources.[Medium]medium.comUPDATE ON OPERATION MAJESTIC 12 DOCUMENTS | by Richard Geldreich, Jr. | Physicist Stanton Friedman’s Articles | MediumJune 28, 2024…
That changes the relevant question. Instead of asking, “Would an ordinary person have known this fact?”, authentication has to ask, “Could a motivated document maker have found this fact in archives, published collections or specialist historical literature?”
Those are very different standards. A detail can be obscure to the general public while remaining readily discoverable by somebody deliberately researching the 1940s national-security establishment.
Photocopies make surface accuracy even less informative
The evidential problem becomes greater when investigators possess only photocopies rather than physical originals. Friedman noted that most of the Cooper material he discussed consisted of Xerox copies. Bland similarly described receiving many-generation photocopies, a form in which he considered authentication impossible from appearance alone.[The Black Vault]theblackvault.comThe Black Vault Update on Operation Majestic 12 DocumentsThe Black VaultUpdate on Operation Majestic 12 Documents - The Black Vault Case Files…
A physical original can potentially provide independent evidence from paper, ink, typing impressions, watermarks and other material characteristics. A photocopy collapses many of those distinctions into an image. It can reproduce an authentic signature and a genuine letterhead alongside newly typed text without necessarily preserving an obvious physical boundary between them.
The same problem applies to the famous early MJ-12 material circulated on film. An independent investigation reproduced by the Center for UFO Studies observed that the filmed papers prevented examination of paper and ink and that old typewriters could be combined with photocopied elements taken from genuine documents.[Center for UFO Studies]cufos.orgCenter for UFO Studies<Greorge M. Eberhart Editor CENTER FOR UFO STUDI…
This does not prove that every photographed or photocopied MJ-12 paper was manufactured in that fashion. It means that visual period correctness cannot carry the evidential burden that it could carry if investigators possessed an independently sourced original whose materials themselves dated securely to the claimed period.
That limitation sits alongside the broader provenance problem identified by US government searches. In 1995 the Government Accountability Office reported that the agencies it consulted had found no evidence that the publicly circulated Majestic 12 material consisted of actual executive-branch documents.[Government Accountability Office]gao.govOpen source on gao.gov.
Which authenticity clues lost the most weight
Later forgeries did not make historical accuracy irrelevant. They changed what different kinds of accuracy can prove.
Correct names and offices are now weak positive evidence. A researcher can obtain them from directories, biographies and archival collections. Their presence still matters when checking for errors, but correctness alone provides little reason to infer secret access.
Period vocabulary is similarly limited. When entire passages can be borrowed from genuine correspondence, authentic-sounding prose may demonstrate access to historical source material rather than access to an MJ-12 programme. The Marshall-Dewey emulation is the clearest concrete example.[Cufon]cufon.orgFRAUDULENT 27-SEPTEMBER-1944 "MJ-12" DOCUMENT…
Signatures cannot authenticate the surrounding text by themselves. Photocopying permits a genuine signature image to appear on fabricated correspondence. Both the Bland case and the disputed Truman comparison demonstrate why signature provenance has to be established independently.[Cufon]cufon.orgFRAUDULENT 27-SEPTEMBER-1944 "MJ-12" DOCUMENT…
Old typography has limited discriminatory value. Friedman’s reconstruction explicitly involved retyping source material with an old typewriter. A typeface compatible with the alleged date can therefore rule out some crude fabrication methods without establishing that the document was actually produced on its stated date.[The Black Vault]theblackvault.comThe Black Vault Update on Operation Majestic 12 DocumentsThe Black VaultUpdate on Operation Majestic 12 Documents - The Black Vault Case Files…
Obscure historical details remain interesting but require a source-access test. The more important question is whether the information was publicly or archivally available before the disputed document surfaced. A “zinger” known to historians but unfamiliar to ordinary readers is much less impressive if it appeared in published documentary collections accessible to a determined researcher.[Cufon]cufon.orgFRAUDULENT 27-SEPTEMBER-1944 "MJ-12" DOCUMENT…
This asymmetry is the central authentication lesson. An anachronism can still strongly damage a document because the real historical author could not have known or used something that did not yet exist. Period correctness is weaker because a later author can deliberately acquire it.
What stronger evidence would have to establish
Once template-based fabrication is demonstrated within the wider MJ-12 corpus, authentication has to move beyond asking whether a paper looks right. Stronger evidence would need to be substantially harder for a document maker to borrow.
That makes provenance especially important: where the particular document came from, who possessed it, whether its custody can be traced back towards the alleged originating office and whether independent archival records corroborate its existence. The National Archives’ MJ-12 searches illustrate the importance of that external trail. Despite extensive searches of Air Force, Joint Chiefs, National Security Council and presidential-library holdings, archivists found no broader MJ-12 documentary series supporting the disputed material; even the Cutler-Twining memorandum they did hold presented several archival anomalies.[National Archives]archives.govNational Archives Project BLUE BOOKNational ArchivesProject BLUE BOOK - Unidentified Flying Objects | National ArchivesJune 25, 2024…
Material examination of an original can also be more valuable than the appearance of a copy, although even period paper or a period typewriter would not by itself prove when the text was composed. Independent records that confirm a document’s routing, registry number, meeting, distribution list or administrative consequences can be stronger because a forger must reproduce not merely one sheet of paper but its place in a wider record system.
This is why the later forgeries alter the MJ-12 debate without logically settling every earlier document. Friedman himself drew that distinction: he accepted that numerous later Cooper documents were emulations or fictional while continuing to defend the Eisenhower Briefing Document, Truman-Forrestal memorandum and Cutler-Twining memorandum.[The Black Vault]theblackvault.comThe Black Vault Update on Operation Majestic 12 DocumentsThe Black VaultUpdate on Operation Majestic 12 Documents - The Black Vault Case Files…
His separation of the documents is a legitimate logical point. Evidence that document B was forged from a historical template does not prove that document A was forged. But it does undermine an authentication argument that says document A is probably genuine because its names, signatures, terminology and bureaucratic texture would have been too difficult for a forger to reproduce.
After the template forgeries were exposed, that assumption was no longer hypothetical. The wider MJ-12 record contained concrete examples showing that convincing period detail could be manufactured from authentic historical material. From that point onward, period accuracy remained useful mainly as a screening test: getting history wrong can expose a document, but getting history right cannot, on its own, prove where the document came from.
Amazon book picks
Further Reading
Books and field guides related to Why Period Perfect Details No Longer Prove MJ 12. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.
Top Secret/Majic: Operation Majestic-12 and the United States...
Top Secret/Majic is the result of nuclear physicist and renowned UFO investigator Stanton T. Friedman's twenty-one year search for the tr...
Forensic Document Examination: Principles and Practice
This book introduces the reader to the basic principles of handwriting and the factors that affect their development. The book discusses...
Scientific Examination of Questioned Documents
This guide to all aspects of a questioned document for attorneys, investigators, document examiners, and others covers the scientific exa...
UFOs and the National Security State: Chronology of a Cover-U...
Included in this volume are the records of more than fifty military bases relating to innumerable violations of sensitive airspace by unk...
eBay marketplace picks
Marketplace Samples
Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.
Selected fromUFO poster oneBay.co.uk.
Endnotes
1.
Source: cufon.org
Link:https://www.cufon.org/cufon/marshall.htm
Source snippet
FRAUDULENT 27-SEPTEMBER-1944 "MJ-12" DOCUMENT...
2.
Source: archives.gov
Title: National Archives Project BLUE BOOK
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/military/air-force/ufos
Source snippet
National ArchivesProject BLUE BOOK - Unidentified Flying Objects | National ArchivesJune 25, 2024...
Published: June 25, 2024
3.
Source: medium.com
Link:https://medium.com/stanton-friedmans-articles/update-on-operation-majestic-12-documents-ed2df58fd8a1
Source snippet
UPDATE ON OPERATION MAJESTIC 12 DOCUMENTS | by Richard Geldreich, Jr. | Physicist Stanton Friedman’s Articles | MediumJune 28, 2024...
Published: June 28, 2024
4.
Source: cufos.org
Title: Center for UFO Studies<
Link:https://cufos.org/PDFs/books/The_Roswell_ReportR2.pdf
Source snippet
Greorge M. Eberhart Editor CENTER FOR UFO STUDI...
5.
Source: archives.gov
Title: ND C Release Lists | National Archives
Link:https://www.archives.gov/declassification/ndc/release-lists
6.
Source: archives.gov
Title: JF K Assassination Records
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/release-2022?order=Num+Pages&os=wtmbzegmu5hwref%3Dapp&page=25&sort=asc
7.
Source: archives.gov
Title: JF K Assassination Records
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/release-2022?order=Doc+Type&page=205&sort=asc
8.
Source: archives.gov
Title: JF K Assassination Records
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/release-2022?order=NARA+Release+Date&os=roku.&page=114&sort=asc
9.
Source: archives.gov
Title: JF K Assassination Records
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/release-2022?order=Title&page=44&search=&sort=desc
10.
Source: archives.gov
Title: JF K Assassination Records
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/release-2022?order=Record+Series&os=___&page=47&sort=desc
11.
Source: archives.gov
Title: JF K Assassination Records
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/release-2022?ftag=MSF0951a18&order=From+Name&page=245&sort=asc
12.
Source: archives.gov
Title: JF K Assassination Records
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/release-2022?order=Record+Series&page=106&s=09&sort=desc
13.
Source: medium.com
Link:https://medium.com/stanton-friedmans-articles/book-review-kevin-d-randles-case-mj-12-the-true-story-behind-the-government-s-ufo-conspiracies-9e06f4e82250
14.
Source: medium.com
Link:https://medium.com/stanton-friedmans-articles/the-ufo-why-questions-8a71135ce042
15.
Source: archives.gov
Title: Records of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) | National Archives
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/intelligence/cia
16.
Source: archives.gov
Title: Townhouse Investigation | National Archives
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/investigations/watergate/townhouse-investigation.html
17.
Source: archives.gov
Title: Do Records Show Proof of UFOs? | National Archives
Link:https://www.archives.gov/news/articles/do-records-show-proof-of-ufos
18.
Source: cufon.org
Title: cufon o
Link:https://cufon.org/cufon/cufon-o.htm
19.
Source: cufon.org
Title: CUFO N “Other Files” Directory TRANSCRIPT (HTML)
Link:https://www.cufon.org/cufon/cufon-o-C.htm
20.
Source: majesticdocuments.com
Title: Majestic Documents
Link:https://majesticdocuments.com/documents/document-authentication/summary-arguments/
Source snippet
Summary Arguments | Majestic DocumentsOctober 31, 2018...
Published: October 31, 2018
21.
Source: majesticdocuments.com
Title: Majestic Documents Authentication Articles | Majestic Documents
Link:https://majesticdocuments.com/documents/document-authentication/authentication-articles/
22.
Source: theblackvault.com
Title: The Black Vault Update on Operation Majestic 12 Documents
Link:https://www.theblackvault.com/casefiles/update-on-operation-majestic-12-documents/
Source snippet
The Black VaultUpdate on Operation Majestic 12 Documents - The Black Vault Case Files...
23.
Source: majesticdocuments.com
Title: Majestic Documents Authenticity Ratings | Majestic Documents
Link:https://majesticdocuments.com/documents/majestic-documents/authenticity-ratings/
Source snippet
Majestic DocumentsAuthenticity Ratings | Majestic DocumentsOctober 29, 2018...
Published: October 29, 2018
24.
Source: cdn.centerforinquiry.org
Title: Center for Inquiry SUN #58
Link:https://cdn.centerforinquiry.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/29/docs/SUN/SUN58.pdf
Source snippet
S KEPTICS UFO NEWSLETTER By Philip J. KlDecember 6, 2024...
Published: December 6, 2024
25.
Source: gao.gov
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/154832
26.
Source: wikidisc.org
Title: Majestic 12 documents | Wiki Disc
Link:https://www.wikidisc.org/wiki/Majestic_12_documents
27.
Source: theblackvault.com
Title: FB I File: Majestic-12
Link:https://www.theblackvault.com/documentarchive/majestic-12/
28.
Source: theblackvault.com
Title: Debunkers At It Again
Link:https://www.theblackvault.com/casefiles/debunkers-at-it-again/
29.
Source: theblackvault.com
Title: The UFO “WHY?” Questions
Link:https://www.theblackvault.com/casefiles/the-ufo-why-questions/
30.
Source: majesticdocuments.com
Title: Timothy S. Cooper | Majestic Documents
Link:https://majesticdocuments.com/documents/document-sources/timothy-s-cooper/
31.
Source: majesticdocuments.com
Title: documents dated 1970 present
Link:https://majesticdocuments.com/documents/majestic-documents/documents-dated-1970-present/
32.
Source: majesticdocuments.com
Title: documents dated 1960 1969
Link:https://majesticdocuments.com/documents/majestic-documents/documents-dated-1960-1969/
33.
Source: majesticdocuments.com
Title: documents dated 1948 1959
Link:https://majesticdocuments.com/documents/majestic-documents/documents-dated-1948-1959/
34.
Source: majesticdocuments.com
Title: documents dated prior to 1948
Link:https://majesticdocuments.com/documents/majestic-documents/documents-dated-prior-to-1948/
35.
Source: majesticdocuments.com
Title: Document Sources | Majestic Documents
Link:https://majesticdocuments.com/documents/document-sources/
36.
Source: theblackvault.com
Title: new majestic 12 mj 12 briefing documents released june 2017
Link:https://www.theblackvault.com/casefiles/new-majestic-12-mj-12-briefing-documents-released-june-2017/
Published: june 2017
37.
Source: paperzz.com
Link:https://paperzz.com/doc/7662694/here—lawfare
38.
Source: books.google.com
Title: Wedemeyer Reports
Link:https://books.google.com/books/about/Wedemeyer_Reports.html?id=MgKSEQAAQBAJ
39.
Source: theblackvault.com
Title: cias role in the study of ufos 1947 90
Link:https://www.theblackvault.com/documentarchive/cias-role-in-the-study-of-ufos-1947-90/
40.
Source: lurch2.blogspot.com
Title: majestic 12
Link:https://lurch2.blogspot.com/2013/09/majestic-12.html
41.
Source: gao.gov
Title: gao 12 175
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/gao
42.
Source: gao.gov
Title: nsiad 95 187
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/nsiad
43.
Source: gao.gov
Title: nsiad 92 110
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/nsiad
44.
Source: gao.gov
Title: nsiad 90 240
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/nsiad
45.
Source: gao.gov
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/130581
46.
Source: gao.gov
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/110508
47.
Source: gao.gov
Title: emd 79 109
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/emd
48.
Source: gao.gov
Title: psad 79 2
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/psad
49.
Source: books.google.com
Title: Wedemeyer Reports
Link:https://books.google.com/books/about/Wedemeyer_Reports.html?id=7eNmAAAAMAAJ
50.
Source: uapcodex.org
Title: majestic 12 documents
Link:https://uapcodex.org/cases/majestic-12-documents/
51.
Source: docs.rs
Title: wordninja 0.1.0
Link:https://docs.rs/crate/wordninja/latest/source/wordninja_words.txt
52.
Source: gao.gov
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/b-166594-0
53.
Source: gao.gov
Title: b 148626
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/b-148626
54.
Source: gao.gov
Title: b 129108
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/b-129108
55.
Source: en.wikisource.org
Title: MJ 12 Document
Link:https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/MJ-12_Document
Additional References
56.
Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ogJplVuElLs
Source snippet
"Majestic 12" document authentication OR typewriter OR forensic The Secret TV Documentary: Authentication of Majestic Documents (MJ-12)...
57.
Source: youtube.com
Title: The Majestic Documents. Ryan Wood on the Richard Dolan Show
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s_ymJcmeEDc
Source snippet
A secret history: Inside shadow intelligence, the MJ-12 documents | Reality Check...
Published: June 10, 2019
58.
Source: youtube.com
Title: The Secret TV Documentary: Authentication of Majestic Documents (MJ-12)
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UG8rEABhzMY
Source snippet
The Majestic Documents. Ryan Wood on the Richard Dolan Show. June 10, 2019...
Published: June 10, 2019
59.
Source: nsa.gov
Link:https://www.nsa.gov/Press-Room/Press-Releases-Statements/Tag/121404/friedman-collection/
60.
Source: cia.gov
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/cia-rdp90-00845r000201300020-0
61.
Source: nsa.gov
Link:https://www.nsa.gov/Helpful-Links/NSA-FOIA/Declassification-Transparency-Initiatives/Historical-Releases/Friedman-Documents/search-strategies/
62.
Source: cia.gov
Title: ATTORNE Y GENERAL TIES KGB TO OLYMPICS DIRTY TRICKS | CIA FOIA (foia.cia.gov)
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/cia-rdp90-00806r000200860004-1
63.
Source: subquantumtech.com
Link:https://subquantumtech.com/crashconf/crashconf_kwic_z.html
64.
Source: scribd.com
Link:https://www.scribd.com/document/643920700/Mamoth-Txt-Doc
65.
Source: studylib.net
Link:https://studylib.net/doc/28106269/detection-of-forgery