Why CIA Searches Never Supplied the Missing MJ 12 Link

Introduction

The CIA’s own released information-review and Freedom of Information Act records supply an unusually clear answer to one narrow question in the MJ-12 controversy: repeated CIA searches did not locate records establishing Majestic 12 as an agency programme or tying the circulating MJ-12 papers to CIA custody. One CIA response says an earlier search was “thorough and diligent”; after the requester appealed, the agency searched again and still located nothing. A separate CIA case log records a Majestic-12 request simply as “No Records Located”.[CIA]cia.govApproved for Release: 2022/10/13 C00934938October 19, 2025…Published: October 19, 2025

Those results do not logically prove that no Majestic 12 record could ever have existed anywhere in government. Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) searches have defined scopes and legal limitations. But for the narrower chain-of-custody question, the distinction is crucial: the searches failed to produce the archival bridge that the alleged documents need. Nothing located by the CIA connects the publicly circulating papers backwards into an identifiable CIA file, records system or documented agency custody.

What the CIA searches were trying to locate

The most useful CIA evidence is not a general statement about unidentified flying objects but the agency’s description of its own Majestic 12 searches. In a released response to FOIA case F-2003-00606, the CIA told a requester that its records showed it had previously searched for “records pertaining to Majestic 12”. The agency characterised that search as thorough and diligent and said no records had been located. More importantly, the earlier requester had appealed the result, prompting a second search. That search also found no records.[CIA]cia.govApproved for Release: 2022/10/13 C00934938October 19, 2025…Published: October 19, 2025

That second search matters because it makes the evidential position stronger than a single unsuccessful database query. An administrative appeal gave the CIA another opportunity to reconsider whether responsive material had been missed. Yet the outcome remained negative. The surviving CIA correspondence does not identify a recovered Majestic file, routing slip, memorandum, register entry or related body of records after either search.[CIA]cia.govApproved for Release: 2022/10/13 C00934938October 19, 2025…Published: October 19, 2025

The result also appears in the agency’s administrative record. A CIA FOIA case log lists case F-2001-01943, subject “MAJESTIC-12”, with the disposition “No Records Located”. The case-log entry is significant because it is an agency-generated record documenting the processing of an MJ-12 request, rather than one of the alleged historical MJ-12 papers submitted from outside government. It therefore demonstrates that the CIA dealt with the subject as a records-search question while simultaneously showing that the search did not recover the historical records being sought.[CIA]cia.govFOIA CASE LOG CALENDER YE[16111550Approved for Release: 2022/O8/23 CO6935701…

An internal CIA information-review document provides still broader confirmation. Discussing subjects frequently raised by UFO researchers, it states that Majestic 12 was a recurring request topic and that the CIA had been unable to locate records on it in previous FOIA searches. The same document separately says that the CIA held no information on the alleged Roswell event. The wording is useful because it describes an established pattern of unsuccessful MJ-12 searches rather than treating the absence as the result of one isolated request.[CIA]cia.govINFORMATION REVIEW & RELE[15598960Approved for Release: 2019/03/27 C01247755March 26, 2026…Published: March 26, 2026

What a “no records” result actually means

A negative FOIA result is narrower than the statement “this thing never existed”. Under the Freedom of Information Act, a search means reviewing agency records, manually or electronically, to locate records responsive to a request. The statute requires reasonable search efforts; it does not convert an unsuccessful search into proof about every document that might once have existed in every government repository.[Department of Justice]justice.govfreedom information act 5 usc 552Department of JusticeOffice of Information Policy | The Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552January 21, 2022…Published: January 21, 2022

US Department of Justice guidance makes the same distinction explicit. Courts judge the adequacy of a FOIA search principally by whether the methods were reasonably calculated to find responsive records, not simply by what the search produced. In one case summarised by the Department, the court stressed that the issue was not whether further documents might conceivably exist, but whether the government’s search was adequate.[Department of Justice]justice.govDepartment of JusticeDepartment of Justice Guide to the Freedom of Information ActApril 13, 2026…Published: April 13, 2026

That distinction prevents two opposite overstatements about MJ-12. The CIA’s negative searches should not be presented as mathematical proof that no person anywhere in the US government ever used the words “Majestic 12”. Conversely, it is equally unsound to dismiss the searches as evidentially meaningless merely because a hypothetical hidden or lost record can be imagined. The actual historical question is comparative: what documentary traces should be available if the circulating papers really descended from an official classified records system, and what traces have searches actually produced?

There is a further technical qualification. CIA records are subject to specialised statutory rules, including provisions concerning operational files. In other FOIA litigation, courts have recognised that CIA operational files can be categorically exempt from ordinary FOIA search and review requirements under the CIA Information Act, subject to statutory exceptions. That limitation means a CIA “no records” response should not automatically be read as a certified inventory of every conceivable CIA-held record.[Department of Justice]justice.govtalbot v dept state no 17 cv 0588 2018 wl 2739921 ddc june 7 2018 cooper jDepartment of JusticeOffice of Information Policy | Talbot v. Dep't of State, No. 17-cv-0588, 2018 WL 2739921 (D.D.C. June 7, 2018) (Coop…Published: June 7, 2018

The CIA’s handling of F-2003-00606 itself illustrates why wording matters. In the same response in which the agency straightforwardly said that repeated Majestic 12 searches had located no records, it gave a different answer concerning Area 51: for that portion of the request it said it could neither confirm nor deny whether responsive records existed, invoking national-security and intelligence-sources-and-methods grounds. Whatever conclusions are drawn from that contrast, the documented point is that the CIA did not use the same neither-confirm-nor-deny formulation for the Majestic 12 search. It reported unsuccessful searches instead.[CIA]cia.govApproved for Release: 2022/10/13 C00934938October 19, 2025…Published: October 19, 2025

Why the searches never supplied the missing archival bridge

The central problem is provenance. The National Archives defines provenance both as the principle of keeping records associated with the records-creating unit and as information about a particular record’s chain of ownership and custody. Its federal holdings are organised on the same principle: records are attributed to the agency that created or maintained them and, where possible, kept in the arrangement in which they were used.[National Archives]archives.govNational ArchivesArchives and Records Management Resources | National ArchivesAugust 15, 2016…Published: August 15, 2016

For an alleged CIA-linked MJ-12 document, therefore, a powerful authentication trail would not necessarily require the CIA to endorse its extraordinary contents. Something more mundane could establish the missing link: an agency file containing the document; a registry or control entry; an authenticated CIA copy received from another office; correspondence discussing its handling; or related records whose filing context independently identifies the document and explains why the CIA possessed it. Such material would connect the object now circulating publicly to an institutional records system.

The released CIA search results provide none of those things. They document searches about MJ-12, but those search records are not themselves evidence of historical CIA custody of the alleged MJ-12 papers. That distinction is easy to miss. A modern CIA FOIA file can prove that somebody asked the CIA about Majestic 12 and that the agency processed the request. It cannot, without responsive historical records, move the disputed papers backwards through time into CIA custody.[CIA]cia.govApproved for Release: 2022/10/13 C00934938October 19, 2025…Published: October 19, 2025

This is where the CIA evidence fits into the wider federal archival picture. The National Archives says it made extensive searches among Air Force and Joint Chiefs of Staff records for MJ-12 material; the Truman and Eisenhower presidential libraries also searched their holdings. National Archives staff additionally searched related defence, Joint Chiefs and Air Force files and reported finding no further information supporting the subject.[National Archives]archives.govNational Archives Project BLUE BOOKNational Archives Project BLUE BOOK

The Government Accountability Office reached the same provenance problem from another direction in 1995. After seeking the views of the Information Security Oversight Office, Air Force and National Archives, GAO reported that those organisations’ knowledge of Majestic 12 was limited to written material submitted by nongovernmental people and that they found no records in their files relating to Majestic 12. GAO found nothing contradicting their conclusion that there was no evidence the circulating Majestic 12 material consisted of genuine documents originating in the executive branch.[Government Accountability Office]gao.govOpen source on gao.gov.

The CIA records therefore add an important agency-specific layer to that broader finding. They do not merely leave the origin of the papers unidentified; they show that attempts to locate the expected CIA side of the documentary trail repeatedly came back empty. In chain-of-custody terms, the arrow runs from outside requesters towards the CIA — people asking the agency about Majestic 12 — but no located archival evidence completes the arrow in the opposite direction, from a historical CIA records system towards the disputed documents.

The difference between absence and missing provenance

The most defensible conclusion is consequently narrower, but stronger, than saying “the CIA proved MJ-12 never existed”. The available CIA evidence establishes repeated unsuccessful record searches. It does not establish universal non-existence, and FOIA law itself cautions against treating search results that way.[CIA]cia.govApproved for Release: 2022/10/13 C00934938October 19, 2025…Published: October 19, 2025

For document authentication, however, universal non-existence is not the standard that matters. The burden is to establish the provenance of the particular papers being offered as historical government records. National Archives practice underscores why: archival descriptions link records to their creators and to the series and record groups in which they belong, preserving the organisational context that gives a government document much of its evidential meaning.[National Archives]archives.govNational Archives Archival Materials and Related Elements | National ArchivesNational Archives Archival Materials and Related Elements | National Archives

The CIA searches never supplied that context for MJ-12. No located CIA record identified a circulating core document as an agency-held classified record; no located file history carried one of those documents through CIA custody; and the CIA’s released search documentation instead records unsuccessful efforts to find Majestic 12 records, including a repeat search following an appeal.[CIA]cia.govApproved for Release: 2022/10/13 C00934938October 19, 2025…Published: October 19, 2025

That is the missing archival bridge in its most precise form. The negative searches are not a stand-alone disproof of every Majestic 12 allegation. They are evidence that, when the CIA looked for the records needed to connect the allegation to its own documentary system, it did not find them. Combined with the parallel National Archives and GAO findings, the result leaves the circulating MJ-12 documents on the public side of the provenance gap rather than securely anchored to documented classified government custody.[National Archives]archives.govNational Archives Project BLUE BOOKNational Archives Project BLUE BOOK

Amazon book picks

Further Reading

Books and field guides related to Why CIA Searches Never Supplied the Missing MJ 12 Link. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.

Book

Top Secret/Majic: Operation Majestic-12 and the United States...

By Stanton T. Friedman

Top Secret/Majic is the result of nuclear physicist and renowned UFO investigator Stanton T. Friedman's twenty-one year search for the tr...

See on Amazon

Book

UFOs and the National Security State: The Cover-Up Exposed, 1...

By Richard M. Dolan

This is the 2nd volume in Richard Dolan's series, "UFOs and the National Security State," which covers all aspects of the UFO phenomenon...

See on Amazon

Book

The CIA and the Cult of Intelligence

By Victor Marchetti, John D. Marks

First published 1974. Subjects: United States, United States. Central Intelligence Agency, CIA, Inlichtingendiensten, Spionage.

See on Amazon

Book

The Puzzle Palace: Inside the National Security Agency, Ameri...

By James Bamford

Behind the scenes at the National Security Agency, which is many times larger than the CIA and spends many billions more per year, is the...

See on Amazon

Browse more on Amazon:Top Secret/Majic: Operation Majestic 12 and the United States Government's UFO Cover upUFOs and the National Security State: The Cover Up Exposed,The CIA and the Cult of Intelligence

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

eBay marketplace picks

Marketplace Samples

Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.

Shop location

UsingUSA USA USAUKCanadaAustraliaIreland

Selected fromUFO poster oneBay.co.uk.

Current eBay listing

I Want To Believe UFO Poster Print The X-Files Television TV A5 A4 A3 Art Print

GBP 5.99 | Free shippingNewSeller: the finepaper house (99.1% positive)Ships from: GB

View listing on eBay

Current eBay listing

I WANT TO BELIEVE X-FILES ALIEN UFO POSTER -FRAMED ART PICTURE PAPER PRINT

GBP 14.99 | Free shippingNewSeller: captivart (99.6% positive)Ships from: GB

View listing on eBay

Current eBay listing

Retro Framed UFO Flying Saucers Art Print Poster Wall Art In Great Condition A3

GBP 21.50 | Shipping GBP 5.15NewSeller: robar 499043 (100.0% positive)Ships from: GB

View listing on eBay

Current eBay listing

COOL FLYING UFO IN FOREST LANDSCAPE FRAMED WALL ART PICTURE POSTER PRINT

GBP 39.99 | Free shippingNewSeller: canvas monkey (99.8% positive)Ships from: GB

View listing on eBay

Browse more oneBay.co.uk

Example items shown for inspiration; availability and pricing can change. Branchoria may earn a commission if you purchase through outbound eBay links.

Endnotes

1. Source: cia.gov
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/F-2003-00606%20FINAL%20RESPON%5B16139957%5D.pdf

Published: October 19, 2025

2. Source: cia.gov
Title: FOIA CASE LOG CALENDER YE[16111550]
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/FOIA%20CASE%20LOG%20CALENDER%20YE%5B16111550%5D.pdf

3. Source: cia.gov
Title: INFORMATION REVIEW & RELE[15598960]
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/INFORMATION%20REVIEW%20%26%20RELE%5B15598960%5D.pdf

Published: March 26, 2026

4. Source: justice.gov
Title: freedom information act 5 usc 552
Link:https://www.justice.gov/oip/freedom-information-act-5-usc-552

Published: January 21, 2022

5. Source: justice.gov
Link:https://www.justice.gov/oip/page/file/1199421/download

Published: April 13, 2026

6. Source: justice.gov
Title: singh v usps no 17 0233 2017 wl 2930590 wd wash july 10 2017 coughenour j
Link:https://www.justice.gov/oip/singh-v-usps-no-17-0233-2017-wl-2930590-wd-wash-july-10-2017-coughenour-j

Published: July 10, 2017

7. Source: justice.gov
Title: talbot v dept state no 17 cv 0588 2018 wl 2739921 ddc june 7 2018 cooper j
Link:https://www.justice.gov/oip/talbot-v-dept-state-no-17-cv-0588-2018-wl-2739921-ddc-june-7-2018-cooper-j

Published: June 7, 2018

8. Source: archives.gov
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/alic/reference/archives-resources/terminology.html

Published: August 15, 2016

9. Source: archives.gov
Title: National Archives Record Group Concept | National Archives
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/guide-fed-records/index-numeric/concept.html

10. Source: archives.gov
Title: National Archives Project BLUE BOOK
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/military/air-force/ufos

11. Source: gao.gov
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/154832

12. Source: archives.gov
Title: National Archives Archival Materials and Related Elements | National Archives
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/catalog/lcdrg/archival-materials

13. Source: justice.gov
Link:https://www.justice.gov/oip/james-madison-project-v-cia-no-22-00321-2025-wl-2465941-ddc-aug-27-2025-nichols-j

14. Source: archives.gov
Title: Function and Use | National Archives
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/catalog/lcdrg/elements/function-and-use

15. Source: justice.gov
Title: franklin v wormuth no 23 02129 2024 wl 3377836 d md july 11 2024 xinis j
Link:https://www.justice.gov/oip/franklin-v-wormuth-no-23-02129-2024-wl-3377836-d-md-july-11-2024-xinis-j

16. Source: archives.gov
Title: Records Management Guidance for Federal Employees | National Archives
Link:https://www.archives.gov/records-mgmt/transition/records-management-guidance-federal-employees

17. Source: justice.gov
Title: Adjudicating Administrative Appeals Under the FOIA
Link:https://www.justice.gov/oip/oip-guidance/Adjudicating%20Administrative%20Appeals%20Under%20the%20FOIA

18. Source: justice.gov
Title: defining a record under the foia
Link:https://www.justice.gov/oip/oip-guidance/defining_a_record_under_the_foia

19. Source: archives.gov
Title: OS S Records | National Archives
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/military/ww2/oss

20. Source: justice.gov
Link:https://www.justice.gov/oip/rocky-mountain-wild-v-us-bureau-land-mgmt-no-18-0314-2020-wl-7770252-d-colo-dec-30-2020-mart-nez

21. Source: justice.gov
Link:https://www.justice.gov/oip/machado-amadis-v-us-dept-state-no-19-5088-2020-wl-4914093-dc-cir-aug-21-2020-curiam

22. Source: justice.gov
Title: glawson v eousa no 18 2673 2020 wl 2735615 ddc may 26 2020 jackson j
Link:https://www.justice.gov/oip/glawson-v-eousa-no-18-2673-2020-wl-2735615-ddc-may-26-2020-jackson-j

23. Source: justice.gov
Title: hardway v cia no 17 1433 2020 wl 1905065 ddc apr 18 2020 kelly j
Link:https://www.justice.gov/oip/hardway-v-cia-no-17-1433-2020-wl-1905065-ddc-apr-18-2020-kelly-j

24. Source: archives.gov
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/foreign-policy/cold-war/ref-info-paper-107

25. Source: justice.gov
Title: amadis v doj no 16 2230 2019 wl 2211120 ddc may 22 2019 mcfadden j
Link:https://www.justice.gov/oip/amadis-v-doj-no-16-2230-2019-wl-2211120-ddc-may-22-2019-mcfadden-j

26. Source: justice.gov
Link:https://www.justice.gov/oip/oip-guidance/oip-guidance-adjudicating-administrative-appeals-under-foia

27. Source: justice.gov
Title: davidson v bop no 17 5429 2017 us app lexis 24272 6th cir nov 29 2017 curiam
Link:https://www.justice.gov/oip/davidson-v-bop-no-17-5429-2017-us-app-lexis-24272-6th-cir-nov-29-2017-curiam

28. Source: justice.gov
Title: hall v doj no 16 1591 2017 wl 4174419 ddc sept 19 2017 contreras j
Link:https://www.justice.gov/oip/hall-v-doj-no-16-1591-2017-wl-4174419-ddc-sept-19-2017-contreras-j

29. Source: archives.gov
Title: Archival Descriptions from the National Archives Catalog | National Archives
Link:https://www.archives.gov/open/dataset-arc.html

30. Source: justice.gov
Title: smith v sessions no 15 0206 2017 wl 1166306 ddc mar 28 2017 howell j
Link:https://www.justice.gov/oip/smith-v-sessions-no-15-0206-2017-wl-1166306-ddc-mar-28-2017-howell-j

31. Source: archives.gov
Title: Documenting Your Public Service | National Archives
Link:https://www.archives.gov/records-mgmt/publications/documenting-your-public-service.html

32. Source: archives.gov
Title: About the Guide to Federal Records | National Archives
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/guide-fed-records/about.html

33. Source: archives.gov
Title: and Records Management Resources | National Archives
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/alic/reference/archives-resources/principles-of-arrangement.html

34. Source: archives.gov
Title: Finding Aids: Holocaust-Era Assets
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/holocaust/finding-aid/introduction.html

35. Source: justice.gov
Title: leopold v cia no 14 1056 2016 wl 1411332 ddc apr 8 2016 boasberg j
Link:https://www.justice.gov/oip/leopold-v-cia-no-14-1056-2016-wl-1411332-ddc-apr-8-2016-boasberg-j

36. Source: justice.gov
Title: pinson v doj no 12 01872 2016 wl 614364 ddc feb 16 2016 contreras j
Link:https://www.justice.gov/oip/pinson-v-doj-no-12-01872-2016-wl-614364-ddc-feb-16-2016-contreras-j

37. Source: justice.gov
Title: donoghue v oip no 13 0256 2016 wl 354874 ddc jan 28 2016 walton j
Link:https://www.justice.gov/oip/donoghue-v-oip-no-13-0256-2016-wl-354874-ddc-jan-28-2016-walton-j

38. Source: justice.gov
Title: westmoreland v fbi no 13 2058 2015 wl 5063181 ddc aug 26 2015 kollar kotelly j
Link:https://www.justice.gov/oip/westmoreland-v-fbi-no-13-2058-2015-wl-5063181-ddc-aug-26-2015-kollar-kotelly-j

39. Source: justice.gov
Title: barouch v doj no 12 0129 2013 wl 4494686 ddc aug 23 2013 berman jackson j
Link:https://www.justice.gov/oip/barouch-v-doj-no-12-0129-2013-wl-4494686-ddc-aug-23-2013-berman-jackson-j

40. Source: foia.gov
Title: FOI A.gov
Link:https://www.foia.gov/iso/opa/foia/oip-110228.html

41. Source: cia.gov
Title: FREEDO M OF INFORMATION AND THE CIA INFORMATION ACT | CIA FOIA (foia.cia.gov)
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/cia-rdp89b00236r000200240001-5

42. Source: justice.gov
Title: foia post 2007 new foia post feature summaries new decisions foia cases
Link:https://www.justice.gov/archives/oip/blog/foia-post-2007-new-foia-post-feature-summaries-new-decisions-foia-cases

43. Source: justice.gov
Title: foia guide 2004 edition procedural requirments
Link:https://www.justice.gov/archives/oip/foia-guide-2004-edition-procedural-requirments

44. Source: justice.gov
Title: foia guide 2004 edition litigation considerations
Link:https://www.justice.gov/archives/oip/foia-guide-2004-edition-litigation-considerations

45. Source: justice.gov
Link:https://www.justice.gov/archive/oip/foiapost/2003foiapost20.htm

46. Source: justice.gov
Link:https://www.justice.gov/archive/oip/foiapost/2003foiapost6.htm

47. Source: justice.gov
Link:https://www.justice.gov/archive/oip/foiastat.htm

48. Source: justice.gov
Link:https://www.justice.gov/archive/oip/foiapost/2002foiapost29.htm

49. Source: justice.gov
Link:https://www.justice.gov/archive/oip/foiapost/2001foiapost16.htm

50. Source: cia.gov
Title: CENTRA L INTELLIGENCE AGENCY INFORMATION ACT | CIA FOIA (foia.cia.gov)
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/cia-rdp89b00236r000200240009-7

51. Source: cia.gov
Title: cia rdp89b00236r000200240021 3
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/cia-rdp89b00236r000200240021-3

52. Source: cia.gov
Title: DISCLOSUR E OF AIR FORCE RECORDS TO THE PUBLIC | CIA FOIA (foia.cia.gov)
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/cia-rdp90b00170r000200230018-9

53. Source: cia.gov
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/01333876

54. Source: cia.gov
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/06935701

55. Source: cia.gov
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/01247763

56. Source: cia.gov
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/F-2004-01956%20APPEAL%5B16509519%5D.pdf

57. Source: cia.gov
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/0001333876

58. Source: lurch2.blogspot.com
Title: majestic 12
Link:https://lurch2.blogspot.com/2013/09/majestic-12.html

59. Source: phatsoheff.tripod.com
Link:https://phatsoheff.tripod.com/ufo.html

60. Source: ro.scribd.com
Link:https://ro.scribd.com/document/472644084/196986

61. Source: internationalflyingsaucerbureau.com
Title: Majestic 12
Link:https://www.internationalflyingsaucerbureau.com/majestic-12/

62. Source: ouci.dntb.gov.ua
Link:https://ouci.dntb.gov.ua/en/works/4LYdyDJw/

63. Source: ouci.dntb.gov.ua
Link:https://ouci.dntb.gov.ua/en/works/7B1Y50p9/

64. Source: sacred-texts.com
Link:https://sacred-texts.com/ufo/mj12_04.htm

65. Source: en.wikisource.org
Title: MJ 12 Document
Link:https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/MJ-12_Document

Additional References

66. Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ogJplVuElLs

67. Source: youtube.com
Title: Fresh FOIA request uncovers new evidence of the Majestic 12 Documents validation
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BCYXCXubK9I

68. Source: youtube.com
Title: The Robertson Panel Chairman and the MJ-12 Connection
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdwNc4ZP55E

69. Source: youtube.com
Title: Grant Cameron on Stanton Friedman, MJ-12, Bob Lazar & TTSA
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p0Deurzzx3c

70. Source: youtube.com
Title: The Majestic-12 Documents [With Ryan S. Wood]
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vzB87RJkQVU

71. Source: tumgik.com
Link:https://www.tumgik.com/tag/with%20way%20fewer%20trees%20tho

72. Source: researchgate.net
Link:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/382935663_Eucalyptus_essential_oils_chemical_profiling_and_pharmacological_potential_for_sustainable_forest_cultivation

73. Source: ozelburogrubu.com
Link:https://www.ozelburogrubu.com/2020/09/24/fbi-files-the-paranormal-collection-124/

74. Source: sentinel-files.com
Link:https://sentinel-files.com/explorer?q=satellite

75. Source: wanttoknow.info
Link:https://www.wanttoknow.info/secrecynewsarticles-0-100000