Within Secrecy Problem

Why Does the Cutler Twining Memo Not Fit the Record?

The disputed Cutler-Twining memo conflicts with filing conventions, surrounding records and the documented schedules of officials named in it.

180 sources 3 graphics
Preview for Why Does the Cutler Twining Memo Not Fit the Record?

On this page

  • The missing Top Secret register number and folder context
  • The proposed briefing versus Eisenhower's appointment records
  • Robert Cutler's travel and the memo's dating problem

Introduction

The Cutler-Twining memorandum is unusually important among the alleged MJ-12 papers because it was found in the US National Archives rather than arriving only through an anonymous source. Yet that archival location does not authenticate its contents. When archivists compared the one-page memo with the filing system around it, National Security Council records and President Dwight D. Eisenhower’s schedule, they found several mismatches: it lacks the Top Secret register number used to organise its record series; nothing else in its folder concerns MJ-12; no corresponding MJ-12 entry appears in relevant NSC records; and Eisenhower’s detailed appointments for the proposed briefing date contain no identifiable meeting with General Nathan Twining.[National Archives]archives.govNational Archives Project BLUE BOOKNational ArchivesProject BLUE BOOK - Unidentified Flying Objects | National ArchivesJune 25, 2024…Published: June 25, 2024

Cutler Memo illustration 1
Explanatory illustration 1

There is also a more immediate chronological problem. The memo is dated 14 July 1954 under the typed name of Robert Cutler, Eisenhower’s special assistant for national security affairs. Official records place Cutler abroad from 3 to 15 July. Supporters have proposed that NSC Executive Secretary James Lay prepared the unsigned memo for him. That is possible in principle, but it changes the question rather than resolving it: the document still has to be reconciled with the filing, scheduling and administrative records that should surround such a communication.[National Archives]archives.govNational Archives Project BLUE BOOKNational ArchivesProject BLUE BOOK - Unidentified Flying Objects | National ArchivesJune 25, 2024…Published: June 25, 2024

The missing register number and folder context

The first difficulty is not simply that the Cutler-Twining memo looks unusual. It is that its archival location gives historians something concrete against which to test it.

The National Archives says the memo was found in Record Group 341, entry 267, records of Headquarters US Air Force. That series was filed according to Top Secret register numbers. The Cutler-Twining sheet has no such number. It was sitting in folder T4-1846, but archivists reported that the folder contained no other document concerning “NSC/MJ-12”. Searches in records of the Secretary of Defense, Joint Chiefs of Staff, Headquarters Air Force and related files likewise produced no further information about the supposed project.[National Archives]archives.govNational Archives Project BLUE BOOKNational ArchivesProject BLUE BOOK - Unidentified Flying Objects | National ArchivesJune 25, 2024…Published: June 25, 2024

That distinction matters. Finding a sheet inside a genuine government archive establishes its custody at the time it was found, not necessarily its original provenance or authenticity. The National Archives explicitly warns that when it certifies a reproduction, it is certifying that the copy corresponds to a document in its custody; it is not authenticating the document or the information written on it.[National Archives]archives.govNational Archives Project BLUE BOOKNational ArchivesProject BLUE BOOK - Unidentified Flying Objects | National ArchivesJune 25, 2024…Published: June 25, 2024

The surrounding administrative record creates further friction. The National Archives reported that the memo carried the wording “Top Secret Restricted Information”, but the NSC Freedom of Information Office said that particular marking did not come into use there until the Nixon administration. The Eisenhower Presidential Library likewise told the Archives that the marking was not used during Eisenhower’s administration.[National Archives]archives.govNational Archives Project BLUE BOOKNational ArchivesProject BLUE BOOK - Unidentified Flying Objects | National ArchivesJune 25, 2024…Published: June 25, 2024

None of these anomalies alone proves that somebody forged or planted the sheet. Stanton Friedman, one of the principal defenders of the original MJ-12 documents, disputed the idea that every genuine Top Secret document necessarily required a control number and argued that archives contained examples without them. He also treated the Cutler-Twining sheet as an unsigned carbon copy rather than a formal signed original.[The UFO Chronicles]theufochronicles.comThe UFO ChroniclesMJ-12: No Proof that TF, CT, or EBD Documents are Fraudulent, Argues FriedmanOctober 25, 2014…Published: October 25, 2014

But that rebuttal has an important limitation. The National Archives’ point was narrower than the proposition that every Top Secret document everywhere required such a number: archivists said that this particular series was filed by Top Secret register number, while this particular sheet lacked one. Combined with its isolation in the folder and the failure to find related MJ-12 paperwork elsewhere, its archival location becomes an anomaly rather than straightforward corroboration.[National Archives]archives.govNational Archives Project BLUE BOOKNational ArchivesProject BLUE BOOK - Unidentified Flying Objects | National ArchivesJune 25, 2024…Published: June 25, 2024

The proposed briefing versus Eisenhower’s appointment records

The memo says that President Eisenhower had decided an “MJ-12 SSP briefing” should occur “during the already scheduled White House meeting of July 16”, rather than after it. This wording creates a useful historical test: what was actually on Eisenhower’s schedule on Friday, 16 July 1954?

The surviving presidential appointment book is remarkably detailed. It records an off-the-record breakfast with Senator William Knowland, a meeting with the Farm Credit Administration and Federal Farm Credit Board, and a 9 a.m. Cabinet meeting. After the Cabinet meeting Eisenhower held an off-the-record budget discussion, signed legislation awarding Irving Berlin a gold medal, received members of Congress, and then left for Congressional Country Club for lunch and golf.[Eisenhower Presidential Library]eisenhowerlibrary.govEisenhower Presidential Library

The Cabinet meeting is the obvious candidate for the memo’s “already scheduled White House meeting”, but its recorded attendance creates a problem. The appointment book names Vice-President Richard Nixon, senior Cabinet officials and White House staff. Nathan Twining is not listed among them. The record even identifies Cabinet officials who were absent.[Eisenhower Presidential Library]eisenhowerlibrary.govEisenhower Presidential Library The Eisenhower Library’s finding aid independently confirms that a Cabinet meeting occurred on 16 July and identifies its recorded subjects, including foreign economic policy organisation, the St Lawrence Seaway, employment security and other ordinary administration business.[Eisenhower Presidential Library]eisenhowerlibrary.govEisenhower Presidential Library Microsoft WordEisenhower Presidential LibraryMicrosoft Word - CABINET.docJune 12, 2008…Published: June 12, 2008

Nor does the official NSC chronology supply an obvious alternative. The National Archives searched the official National Security Council meeting-minute files and found no NSC meeting on 16 July 1954. Its search of all NSC meeting minutes for July found no mention of MJ-12 or Majestic, while searches of NSC indices for MJ-12, Majestic and several UFO-related terms were also negative.[National Archives]archives.govNational Archives Project BLUE BOOKNational ArchivesProject BLUE BOOK - Unidentified Flying Objects | National ArchivesJune 25, 2024…Published: June 25, 2024

This does not establish that Eisenhower could never have held an unrecorded classified briefing. The more telling point is that his appointment records demonstrably did record sensitive and informal business. On 14 July, for example, the appointment book explicitly labels several encounters “OFF THE RECORD” and records James Lay and Everett Gleason briefing Eisenhower on National Security Council affairs.[Eisenhower Presidential Library]eisenhowerlibrary.govEisenhower Presidential Library The Eisenhower Library therefore told the National Archives that even presidential meetings conducted off the record normally left appointment-book entries giving a time and participants.[National Archives]archives.govNational Archives Project BLUE BOOKNational ArchivesProject BLUE BOOK - Unidentified Flying Objects | National ArchivesJune 25, 2024…Published: June 25, 2024

There is nevertheless a legitimate qualification raised by defenders of the memo. Its text does not actually say that the “already scheduled White House meeting” was an NSC meeting. Friedman stressed precisely this distinction, arguing that critics had read more into the sentence than it contains.[Medium]medium.comBook Review: Kevin D. Randle’s CASE MJ-12: THE TRUE STORY BEHIND THE GOVERNMENT’S UFO CONSPIRACIES | by Richard Geldreich, Jr. | Ph… That weakens the narrow claim that the absence of an NSC meeting automatically disproves the document.

It does not, however, solve the broader scheduling problem. The presidential record provides a detailed account of 16 July without identifying an MJ-12 briefing or a meeting between Eisenhower and Twining. The alleged memo therefore asks the reader to infer a sensitive additional event in precisely the place where the surviving scheduling system provides unusually detailed contemporaneous evidence.

The contrast with neighbouring dates is particularly useful. On 15 July — the day before the alleged briefing — Eisenhower’s appointment book explicitly records General Nathan F. Twining, identifying him as Air Force Chief of Staff, among those attending the President’s luncheon for Libyan Prime Minister Mustafa Ben Halim. On 19 July it again explicitly records Twining, this time with Joint Chiefs chairman Admiral Arthur Radford.[Eisenhower Presidential Library]eisenhowerlibrary.govEisenhower Presidential Library Twining was therefore not someone routinely omitted from the presidential schedule simply because of his military position.

Cutler Memo illustration 2
Explanatory illustration 2

Robert Cutler’s travel and the memo’s dating problem

The date at the top of the memo creates the clearest personal contradiction. Robert Cutler was not in Washington on 14 July.

According to the National Archives’ investigation, Eisenhower had sent Cutler on a tour of overseas military installations. Records in Eisenhower’s presidential papers include Cutler’s report after his return, dated 20 July, describing visits to installations in Europe and North Africa between 3 and 15 July 1954. The NSC Staff Papers also contain Cutler’s 3 July instructions concerning how James S. Lay and J. Patrick Coyne should handle NSC administrative business while he was away.[National Archives]archives.govNational Archives Project BLUE BOOKNational ArchivesProject BLUE BOOK - Unidentified Flying Objects | National ArchivesJune 25, 2024…Published: June 25, 2024

That means the memo cannot straightforwardly be treated as a document personally prepared and dispatched by Cutler in Washington on 14 July. Its lack of a handwritten signature or “/s/” notation is consequently important: there is no claim on the face of the surviving sheet that Cutler physically signed it.

Friedman turned that apparent weakness into his principal defence. He argued that Cutler had instructed Lay to keep business moving during his absence, that Lay dealt closely with Cutler, and that Lay met with Eisenhower on 14 July. Eisenhower’s own appointment book does indeed support part of that reconstruction: it records Lay and Everett Gleason briefing the President on NSC matters that day.[Medium]medium.comUPDATE ON OPERATION MAJESTIC 12 DOCUMENTS | by Richard Geldreich, Jr. | Physicist Stanton Friedman’s Articles | Medium… Friedman therefore proposed that Lay could have produced the short scheduling memorandum in Cutler’s name after receiving instructions concerning the briefing.

That is a materially stronger defence than pretending Cutler was in Washington. But it remains a reconstruction, not a documented chain of transmission. The National Archives took the opposite view, reasoning that because Cutler was absent and had delegated administrative responsibilities, one would expect Lay or Coyne to have signed such a memorandum.[National Archives]archives.govNational Archives Project BLUE BOOKNational ArchivesProject BLUE BOOK - Unidentified Flying Objects | National ArchivesJune 25, 2024…Published: June 25, 2024 Contemporary sceptical analysis also pointed to another useful comparison: Lay issued a Top Secret memorandum on 14 July over his own name, showing that he was conducting classified NSC correspondence in his own official capacity that day.[Skeptical Inquirer]skepticalinquirer.orgSkeptical InquirertheSkeptical Inquirer THE NEUROPATHOLOGY…

The distinction is important for evaluating the claim fairly. Cutler’s absence does not make it physically impossible for his office to send correspondence carrying his typed name. Yet accepting that explanation requires an additional undocumented step — Lay composing or transmitting this particular memorandum for Cutler — precisely because the ordinary reading of the document conflicts with Cutler’s documented whereabouts.

Why the contradictions matter more together

Any one anomaly can attract an ad hoc explanation. A missing register number might reflect an exception. An isolated sheet might have become separated from related papers. A secret briefing might have escaped a meeting calendar. An assistant might have written correspondence for an absent superior. Classification markings might have been handled irregularly.

The difficulty is cumulative. The same one-page document requires several such accommodations at once:

  • it lacks the register number expected from the series in which it was found;
  • its folder contains no accompanying MJ-12 material;
  • wider searches of relevant military and NSC records produced no corroborating MJ-12 administrative trail;
  • its security marking was identified by the NSC and Eisenhower Library as inconsistent with Eisenhower-era NSC usage;
  • no NSC meeting occurred on the stated briefing date;
  • Eisenhower’s detailed 16 July appointment record identifies neither Twining nor an identifiable MJ-12 briefing;
  • Cutler was abroad when the memorandum bearing his typed name was dated.[National Archives]archives.govNational Archives Project BLUE BOOKNational ArchivesProject BLUE BOOK - Unidentified Flying Objects | National ArchivesJune 25, 2024…Published: June 25, 2024

That accumulation is why the Cutler-Twining memo presents a particular problem for arguments based on official secrecy. Secrecy can plausibly explain why the subject of a classified briefing would be concealed. It is less effective at explaining why the surviving document conflicts at several independent points with the administrative machinery surrounding it.

There is an important caution here. Government archives are not perfect. The US General Accounting Office’s much broader 1995 Roswell records search explicitly found that some government records it wanted were missing without explanation and that historical retention and disposal rules could be unclear or change over time.[GAO]gao.govnsiadNSIAD-95-187 Government Records: Results of a Search for Records Concerning the 1947 Crash Near Roswell, New Mexico… Absence from an archive therefore cannot be converted into mathematical proof that an event never happened.

But the Cutler-Twining case is not based solely on missing records. It combines absence with positive contradictory context: the record series has a filing convention the memo does not follow; Cutler’s documented travel conflicts with the document’s apparent authorship; the presidential diary records what Eisenhower actually did on the relevant date; and that same diary readily identifies Twining on adjacent dates when he really did meet or appear with the President.[National Archives]archives.govNational Archives Project BLUE BOOKNational ArchivesProject BLUE BOOK - Unidentified Flying Objects | National ArchivesJune 25, 2024…Published: June 25, 2024

That makes the document’s presence in the National Archives less decisive than it first appears. Its archival discovery is real, and some of the objections have plausible counterarguments. What has never emerged is the independent administrative trail that would turn the sheet from an anomalous item in government custody into an authenticated record of an MJ-12 briefing. On the available official record, the Cutler-Twining memo fits its historical surroundings poorly — and explaining that poor fit requires assuming precisely the exceptional secrecy and procedural irregularity that the document is supposed to help prove.

Cutler Memo illustration 3
Explanatory illustration 3

Amazon book picks

Further Reading

Books and field guides related to Why Does the Cutler Twining Memo Not Fit the Record?. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.

eBay marketplace picks

Marketplace Samples

Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.

UsingUSA

Selected fromUFO poster oneBay.co.uk.

Endnotes

1. Source: archives.gov
Title: National Archives Project BLUE BOOK
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/military/air-force/ufos

Source snippet

National ArchivesProject BLUE BOOK - Unidentified Flying Objects | National ArchivesJune 25, 2024...

Published: June 25, 2024

2. Source: eisenhowerlibrary.gov
Title: Eisenhower Presidential Library
Link:https://www.eisenhowerlibrary.gov/sites/default/files/research/online-documents/presidential-appointment-books/1954/july-1954.pdf

3. Source: medium.com
Link:https://medium.com/stanton-friedmans-articles/update-on-operation-majestic-12-documents-ed2df58fd8a1

Source snippet

UPDATE ON OPERATION MAJESTIC 12 DOCUMENTS | by Richard Geldreich, Jr. | Physicist Stanton Friedman’s Articles | Medium...

4. Source: reaganlibrary.archives.gov
Title: Reagan Library Ronald Reagan Presidential Library
Link:https://reaganlibrary.archives.gov/public/2021-06/40-654-209237726-004-008-2021.pdf

5. Source: medium.com
Link:https://medium.com/stanton-friedmans-articles/book-review-kevin-d-randles-case-mj-12-the-true-story-behind-the-government-s-ufo-conspiracies-9e06f4e82250

Source snippet

Book Review: Kevin D. Randle’s CASE MJ-12: THE TRUE STORY BEHIND THE GOVERNMENT’S UFO CONSPIRACIES | by Richard Geldreich, Jr. | Ph...

6. Source: gao.gov
Title: nsiad 95 187
Link:https://www.gao.gov/assets/nsiad-95-187.pdf

Source snippet

NSIAD-95-187 Government Records: Results of a Search for Records Concerning the 1947 Crash Near Roswell, New Mexico...

7. Source: archives.gov
Title: decision table fy2016 0
Link:https://www.archives.gov/declassification/iscap/decision-table-fy2016-0

8. Source: archives.gov
Title: ISCA P Releases | National Archives
Link:https://www.archives.gov/declassification/iscap/decision-table

9. Source: archives.gov
Title: Records of Dr. John C. Cutler | National Archives
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/health/cdc-cutler-records

10. Source: archives.gov
Title: National Archives Releases John Cutler Papers Online | National Archives
Link:https://www.archives.gov/press/press-releases/2011-346

11. Source: gao.gov
Link:https://www.gao.gov/assets/a76263.html

12. Source: gao.gov
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/154832

13. Source: gao.gov
Title: nsiad 95 187
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/nsiad

14. Source: content.time.com
Title: 0,33009,810410 1,00
Link:https://content.time.com/time/subscriber/article/0%2C33009%2C810410-1%2C00.html

15. Source: time.com
Title: defense the air force we need
Link:https://time.com/archive/6869752/defense-the-air-force-we-need/

16. Source: gao.gov
Title: b 119508
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/b-119508

17. Source: gao.gov
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/b-112109%2Cb-121072-3

18. Source: gao.gov
Title: b 117819
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/b-117819

19. Source: gao.gov
Title: b 117367
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/b-117367

20. Source: gao.gov
Title: b 119746
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/b-119746

21. Source: gao.gov
Title: b 118109
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/b-118109

22. Source: gao.gov
Title: b 119536
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/b-119536

23. Source: gao.gov
Title: b 119456
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/b-119456

24. Source: gao.gov
Title: b 114595
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/b-114595

25. Source: gao.gov
Title: b 118134
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/b-118134

26. Source: gao.gov
Title: b 110609
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/b-110609

27. Source: founders.archives.gov
Link:https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Madison/03

28. Source: founders.archives.gov
Link:https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Madison/01

29. Source: founders.archives.gov
Link:https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Hamilton/01

30. Source: founders.archives.gov
Link:https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Jefferson/01

31. Source: founders.archives.gov
Link:https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Madison/01

32. Source: founders.archives.gov
Link:https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Madison/01

33. Source: founders.archives.gov
Link:https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Madison/01

34. Source: theufochronicles.com
Link:https://www.theufochronicles.com/2014/10/mj-12-no-proof-that-tf-ct-or-ebd.html

Source snippet

The UFO ChroniclesMJ-12: No Proof that TF, CT, or EBD Documents are Fraudulent, Argues FriedmanOctober 25, 2014...

Published: October 25, 2014

35. Source: eisenhowerlibrary.gov
Title: Eisenhower Presidential Library Microsoft Word
Link:https://www.eisenhowerlibrary.gov/sites/default/files/research/finding-aids/pdf/eisenhower-dwight-papers-as-president/cabinet-series.pdf

Source snippet

Eisenhower Presidential LibraryMicrosoft Word - CABINET.docJune 12, 2008...

Published: June 12, 2008

36. Source: skepticalinquirer.org
Title: Skeptical Inquirerthe
Link:https://skepticalinquirer.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/29/2019/03/Issue-03-9.pdf

Source snippet

Skeptical Inquirer THE NEUROPATHOLOGY...

37. Source: wikidisc.org
Title: Nathan F. Twining | Wiki Disc
Link:https://www.wikidisc.org/wiki/Nathan_F._Twining

38. Source: wikidisc.org
Title: Majestic 12 documents | Wiki Disc
Link:https://www.wikidisc.org/wiki/Majestic_12_documents

39. Source: sloppyintelligence.com
Title: Majestic 12
Link:https://sloppyintelligence.com/majestic-12-2/

40. Source: eisenhowerlibrary.gov
Title: Presidential Appointment Books | Eisenhower Presidential Library
Link:https://www.eisenhowerlibrary.gov/research/presidential-appointment-books

41. Source: eisenhowerlibrary.gov
Title: Presidential Years | Eisenhower Presidential Library
Link:https://www.eisenhowerlibrary.gov/eisenhowers/presidential-years

42. Source: theblackvault.com
Title: Update on Operation Majestic 12 Documents
Link:https://www.theblackvault.com/casefiles/update-on-operation-majestic-12-documents/

43. Source: theufochronicles.com
Title: the myth of mj 12 appendix pt 2
Link:https://www.theufochronicles.com/2014/06/the-myth-of-mj-12-appendix-pt-2.html

44. Source: lurch2.blogspot.com
Title: majestic 12
Link:https://lurch2.blogspot.com/2013/09/majestic-12.html

45. Source: vault.fbi.gov
Link:https://vault.fbi.gov/Majestic%2012/Majestic%2012%20Part%2001%20%28Final%29/view

46. Source: Wikipedia
Title: Majestic 12
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Majestic_12

47. Source: eisenhowerlibrary.gov
Link:https://www.eisenhowerlibrary.gov/research/finding-aids/white-house-office-office-special-assistant-national-security-affairs-robert

48. Source: eisenhowerlibrary.gov
Title: cutler robert
Link:https://www.eisenhowerlibrary.gov/research/finding-aids/cutler-robert

49. Source: eisenhowerlibrary.gov
Title: Declassified Documents
Link:https://www.eisenhowerlibrary.gov/research/online-documents/declassified-documents-fiscal-year-2015

50. Source: eisenhowerlibrary.gov
Title: howard edwin b
Link:https://www.eisenhowerlibrary.gov/research/finding-aids/howard-edwin-b

51. Source: eisenhowerlibrary.gov
Link:https://www.eisenhowerlibrary.gov/research/online-documents/world-war-one

52. Source: eisenhowerlibrary.gov
Title: Declassified Documents
Link:https://www.eisenhowerlibrary.gov/research/online-documents/declassified-documents-fiscal-year-2014

53. Source: eisenhowerlibrary.gov
Title: Declassified Documents
Link:https://www.eisenhowerlibrary.gov/research/online-documents/declassified-documents-fiscal-year-2010

54. Source: eisenhowerlibrary.gov
Link:https://www.eisenhowerlibrary.gov/search/%E9%BB%91%E7%9A%AE%E4%B9%A6bt?page=1

55. Source: eisenhowerlibrary.gov
Title: Declassified Documents
Link:https://www.eisenhowerlibrary.gov/research/online-documents/declassified-documents-fiscal-year-2011

56. Source: eisenhowerlibrary.gov
Link:https://www.eisenhowerlibrary.gov/search/visit?page=22

57. Source: journals.ala.org
Link:https://journals.ala.org/index.php/dttp/article/view/7028/9553

58. Source: internationalflyingsaucerbureau.com
Title: Majestic 12
Link:https://www.internationalflyingsaucerbureau.com/majestic-12/

59. Source: scribd.com
Title: Majestic 12
Link:https://www.scribd.com/document/1606041/Majestic-12

60. Source: fr.scribd.com
Title: Majestic 12
Link:https://fr.scribd.com/document/1606041/Majestic-12

61. Source: skepticalinquirer.org
Link:https://skepticalinquirer.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/29/2019/03/Issue-02-10.pdf

62. Source: col2.com
Title: operation majestic 12
Link:https://col2.com/operation-majestic-12

63. Source: fieldreportarchive.com
Link:https://fieldreportarchive.com/case?id=majestic_12

64. Source: liquisearch.com
Title: Majestic 12
Link:https://www.liquisearch.com/majestic_12/authenticity_debate/arguments_against/the_cutler_memo

65. Source: luforu.org
Title: Cutler-Twining memo
Link:https://luforu.org/cutler-twining-memo/

Additional References

66. Source: youtube.com
Title: The Majestic Documents. Ryan Wood on the Richard Dolan Show
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s_ymJcmeEDc

Source snippet

Cutler-Twining Memo Majestic 12 National Archives The Majestic-12 Documents [With Ryan S. Wood]...

67. Source: ufomagazines.com
Title: UFO Magazine Archive JUST CAUSE — Just Cause
Link:https://www.ufomagazines.com/just-cause-new-series-just-cause-1988-03-no-15-new-series/

Source snippet

UFO Magazine ArchiveJUST CAUSE — Just Cause - New Series | UFO Magazine Archive...

68. Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ogJplVuElLs

Source snippet

The Nathan Twining Memo, And Why It's Important...

69. Source: youtube.com
Title: Karl Pflock
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8g5tYfcQ9RQ

Source snippet

A secret history: Inside shadow intelligence, the MJ-12 documents | Reality Check...

70. Source: fbi.gov
Link:https://www.fbi.gov/video-repository/inside-the-fbi-ufos-102921.mp4/view

71. Source: loc.gov
Link:https://www.loc.gov/pictures/item/00652118/

72. Source: nsa.gov
Link:https://www.nsa.gov/Helpful-Links/NSA-FOIA/Declassification-Transparency-Initiatives/FOIA-Reports-and-Releases/FOIA-Reports-and-Releases-List/igphoto/2002761379/

73. Source: youtube.com
Title: The Nathan Twining Memo, And Why It’s Important
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l-h7GXBm0iU

Source snippet

The Majestic Documents. Ryan Wood on the Richard Dolan Show...

74. Source: reddit.com
Link:https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1f8a4zc/extraordinary_top_secret_meeting_mentioned_cia/

75. Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/groups/198455902158792/posts/1378629720808065/