Within Majestic 12
Which MJ 12 Anomalies Would Actually Prove Forgery?
A document can contain suspicious features without being conclusively forged, so the strength of each anomaly must be judged separately.
On this page
- Weak and strong anomaly types
- Impossible facts versus unusual practices
- Why cumulative evidence matters
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
The most useful way to assess anomalies in the alleged MJ-12 documents is not to count them, but to ask what each one is capable of proving. An odd date style, missing control number or unusual sheet of paper may reduce confidence without making authenticity impossible. A genuinely anachronistic feature, by contrast — something demonstrably unavailable or institutionally impossible on the claimed date — can be a direct falsification test if it cannot reasonably be explained as a later annotation, copy artefact or clerical exception.
That distinction matters particularly for MJ-12 because the evidence is uneven. The National Archives identified numerous problems with the Cutler-Twining memorandum, while the FBI records that the Air Force judged the principal MJ-12 briefing material fake and the Government Accountability Office (GAO) found no evidence that the material originated in the executive branch. Yet some frequently repeated individual objections are weaker than those official conclusions might suggest when examined in isolation.[archives.gov]archives.govNational Archives Project BLUE BOOKNational ArchivesProject BLUE BOOK - Unidentified Flying Objects | National ArchivesJune 25, 2024…
Which anomalies are weak, and which could be decisive?
Document authentication works best when an anomaly is framed as a testable proposition rather than an impression that something “looks wrong”. The strongest question is: could an authentic document, created when and where it claims, possess this feature?
For MJ-12 material, anomalies fall roughly into three evidential levels.
- Weak anomalies are departures from normal practice that have documented exceptions. Date formats are the clearest example. Critics have objected to forms such as “18 November, 1952” in the Eisenhower Briefing Document. MJ-12 advocate Stanton Friedman replied by producing examples of different date formats in genuine government papers, including material associated with senior intelligence officials. That rebuttal does not authenticate the briefing document; it simply shows why “unusual date punctuation” is not automatically equivalent to “impossible in 1952”.[Medium]medium.comUPDATE ON OPERATION MAJESTIC 12 DOCUMENTS | by Richard Geldreich, Jr. | Physicist Stanton Friedman’s Articles | MediumJune 28, 2024…
- Strong anomalies are features that would be difficult to reconcile with ordinary administrative practice and for which multiple independent records point in the same direction. The Cutler-Twining memorandum’s missing Top Secret register number, isolation from any related MJ-12 correspondence, absence of corroborating NSC records and anomalous physical form collectively fit this category. The National Archives recorded all of these problems after searching relevant Air Force, Joint Chiefs, National Security Council and presidential-library holdings.[National Archives]archives.govNational Archives Project BLUE BOOKNational ArchivesProject BLUE BOOK - Unidentified Flying Objects | National ArchivesJune 25, 2024…
- Potential falsifiers are features that contradict a securely established historical constraint. A classification marking demonstrably introduced years after the purported creation date, for example, can be much more serious than a merely uncommon format. Likewise, evidence that a purported handwritten signature was mechanically copied from another specific document would directly undermine the proposition that the signer personally signed the questioned paper. Whether such a test becomes conclusive depends on excluding innocent mechanisms such as later stamps, authorised signature reproduction or copying during subsequent record handling.
This hierarchy prevents two opposite mistakes: declaring a forgery from one eccentric typographical detail, or dismissing every anomaly because bureaucracies sometimes break their own rules.
Impossible facts matter more than unusual practices
The Cutler-Twining memorandum shows why this distinction is necessary. The National Archives reported that the document carries the marking “Top Secret Restricted Information”. Its enquiries found that this particular marking did not come into use at the National Security Council until the Nixon administration, while the memorandum is dated 14 July 1954 during the Eisenhower administration. The Eisenhower Presidential Library likewise told the Archives that the marking was not used during Eisenhower’s presidency.[National Archives]archives.govNational Archives Project BLUE BOOKNational ArchivesProject BLUE BOOK - Unidentified Flying Objects | National ArchivesJune 25, 2024…
That is a far stronger anomaly than an unconventional date format because it concerns historical availability rather than preferred style. Even here, however, the correct test is more precise than “wrong marking equals forgery”. Investigators would need to establish that the questioned marking was part of the document when created rather than something applied later in its archival or security history. Without that distinction, a potentially decisive anachronism can be overstated.
By comparison, Robert Cutler’s absence from Washington on 14 July 1954 is powerful contextual evidence but not, by itself, an impossibility. The National Archives established that Cutler was inspecting installations in Europe and North Africa from 3 to 15 July and had left instructions for James Lay and J. Patrick Coyne to handle NSC business during his absence. The Archives reasonably observed that one would expect Lay or Coyne to have signed a genuine memorandum sent for Cutler.[National Archives]archives.govNational Archives Project BLUE BOOKNational ArchivesProject BLUE BOOK - Unidentified Flying Objects | National ArchivesJune 25, 2024…
Friedman’s counterargument therefore addresses a real logical point: the Cutler-Twining paper is unsigned, and staff could theoretically have prepared routine correspondence in Cutler’s name while he was away. He cited Cutler’s instruction to keep matters moving during his absence as evidence for that possibility.[The Black Vault]theblackvault.comThe Black Vault Update on Operation Majestic 12 DocumentsThe Black VaultUpdate on Operation Majestic 12 Documents - The Black Vault Case Files… The absence is still suspicious, particularly alongside the document’s other defects, but saying “Cutler was abroad, therefore the memo cannot be genuine” claims more than the fact alone proves.
The same caution applies to paper and letterhead. The Archives found that the Cutler-Twining memorandum lacked official government letterhead or an eagle watermark and was typed on diction onionskin. Samples of Cutler’s NSC papers showed characteristic paper practices, including White House letterhead for much outgoing correspondence. Yet the Archives also found variations among onionskin copies.[National Archives]archives.govNational Archives Project BLUE BOOKNational ArchivesProject BLUE BOOK - Unidentified Flying Objects | National ArchivesJune 25, 2024… Paper that differs from the norm is therefore evidentially relevant without necessarily constituting a physical impossibility.
The Truman signature is a different kind of test
One of the most serious claims against the core MJ-12 papers concerns the purported 24 September 1947 Truman-to-Forrestal memorandum. Critics have argued that President Harry Truman’s signature on it was copied from an authentic 1 October 1947 letter to Vannevar Bush.
Accounts of the comparison report more than a general resemblance. After correcting for scale, the signatures are said to coincide in their strokes and to share a small accidental pen movement at the beginning of the “H”. Critics further argued that details near the “T” were consistent with removal of surrounding material from the source signature before reproduction.[Lurch2]lurch2.blogspot.commajestic 12majestic 12
If those observations are correct and the two images derive from the same physical pen trace, this is qualitatively different from saying that Truman’s signature “looks odd”. Two independently written signatures from the same person can be very similar but do not reproduce incidental microscopic irregularities identically. Demonstrating common-image origin would therefore falsify the claim that the MJ-12 version is an independently handwritten Truman signature.
What it would not automatically establish is every additional proposition sometimes attached to it. A copied signature proves copying of the signature image; determining who created the document, when the composite was made and whether the remainder of the text derives from some other source are separate questions. Good falsification tests should be no broader than their evidence.
This distinction is especially important because the original core MJ-12 briefing material became public as photographs on anonymously mailed film rather than as inspectable government originals. Image reproduction complicates traditional forensic examination: paper fibres, ink chemistry, typing impressions and the physical sequence in which marks were applied cannot be tested on a photographic generation in the same way they could on an original sheet.
Missing records are powerful but rarely an isolated knockout
The archival silence surrounding MJ-12 is extensive. The National Archives searched records of the Secretary of Defense, Joint Chiefs of Staff, Air Force and National Security Council, together with relevant presidential-library material. Its index searches for “MJ-12”, “Majestic”, UFO-related terminology and similar terms found no supporting NSC material apart from the disputed Cutler-Twining sheet itself. It also found no NSC meeting on 16 July 1954 matching the briefing described by that memorandum, and Eisenhower’s appointment books contained no entry for the proposed special meeting.[National Archives]archives.govNational Archives Project BLUE BOOKNational ArchivesProject BLUE BOOK - Unidentified Flying Objects | National ArchivesJune 25, 2024…
The GAO later reached a broader institutional finding. After consulting the Information Security Oversight Office, Air Force and National Archives, it reported in 1995 that their knowledge of MJ-12 derived from material supplied by non-governmental people and that there was no evidence that the written material constituted actual documents originating in the executive branch.[GAO]gao.govComments on Majestic 12 Material] | U.S. GAOGAO[Comments on Majestic 12 Material] | U.S. GAO…
These searches heavily damage the authentication case, but “nothing was found” is not logically identical to “the organisation could not have existed”. Secret programmes can generate incomplete, compartmented or later-destroyed records. The evidential force instead comes from the mismatch between what the papers themselves imply and what the surviving administrative ecosystem contains.
A supposedly presidential, multi-agency operation involving senior officials should normally leave indirect traces: scheduling records, control entries, routing copies, file references, security procedures, budgetary or personnel artefacts, successor correspondence or references in papers of participants. The more ordinary administrative consequences a document predicts, and the more thoroughly the relevant repositories have been searched without finding them, the less plausible an authenticity hypothesis becomes.
That makes archival absence a cumulative test rather than a single absolute falsifier.
Why several modest anomalies can outweigh one disputed “smoking gun”
The strongest case against an alleged historical document often does not depend on finding one spectacular mistake. Independent anomalies multiply because each requires an additional special explanation.
Consider the Cutler-Twining memorandum. To sustain authenticity, a defender must address not merely Cutler’s travel but a cluster identified by the National Archives: no Top Secret register number in a series organised by such numbers; no other MJ-12 papers in the folder; no corroborating records in searches of related agencies; a problematic security marking; atypical paper characteristics; no recorded 16 July NSC meeting; no relevant NSC index entry; no appointment-book entry; and the fact that Cutler was overseas when the document was dated.[National Archives]archives.govNational Archives Project BLUE BOOKNational ArchivesProject BLUE BOOK - Unidentified Flying Objects | National ArchivesJune 25, 2024…
Several of those points individually admit possible explanations. Combined, however, they change the balance of probability. An authentic document can be misfiled. A clerk can omit a control number. A meeting can be handled unusually. An outgoing copy can appear on unexpected paper. A principal can be away while staff act for him. What becomes difficult is explaining why so many departures from the expected documentary trail occur in the same disputed item without producing independent corroboration.
The reverse principle also applies. An apparent point in favour of authenticity cannot erase contradictory evidence merely because it seems difficult for a forger to know. Friedman, for example, argued that certain historical details in the MJ-12 papers were obscure yet accurate and therefore difficult to explain as fabrication.[CloudFront]d2r0txsugik6oi.cloudfront.netOpen source on cloudfront.net. Such observations can legitimately raise the evidential value of a document, but they must be weighed against provenance and falsification tests rather than treated as self-authenticating. A knowledgeable forger can reproduce true obscure facts; an authentic document cannot contain a truly impossible contemporary feature.
What would actually prove an MJ-12 document forged?
For a particular alleged MJ-12 paper, the cleanest falsification would be a contradiction that survives plausible alternative explanations. Examples would include:
- A demonstrably post-dated physical feature. If the original sheet could be shown to use a typeface, machine technology, ink, paper stock or classification device not manufactured until after its stated date, and later alteration could be excluded, the document could not have been produced as claimed.
- A mechanically transplanted element presented as original. Establishing that a supposed contemporary handwritten signature is the same image copied from a separately identifiable document would falsify the claim that the questioned page was signed in the ordinary manner attributed to its purported author.
- Content dependent on information created later. If a 1952 briefing demonstrably incorporates a story, phrase, factual error or unique formulation whose documentary origin can be securely dated to a later period, that would amount to textual anachronism rather than mere unusual wording.
- An administrative requirement with no possible exception. A missing number or form is decisive only if the governing rules show that the document could not legally or mechanically have existed without it and no known exception, draft status or copy process accounts for the omission.
Most famous MJ-12 criticisms do not independently meet that standard. That is why arguments based merely on commas, unusual vocabulary, titles or bureaucratic neatness should be treated cautiously. Friedman specifically challenged claims that words such as “media” and “impacted” were inherently anachronistic and produced archival examples of variable governmental date styles.[Medium]medium.comUPDATE ON OPERATION MAJESTIC 12 DOCUMENTS | by Richard Geldreich, Jr. | Physicist Stanton Friedman’s Articles | MediumJune 28, 2024… Even if those stylistic choices remain suspicious in context, an attested period usage destroys a simple “this word did not exist then” falsification argument.
Conversely, weakening one criticism does not rehabilitate the whole document. Authenticity requires the document’s provenance, physical characteristics, language, administrative context and historical claims to cohere. Showing that officials occasionally used an unusual comma answers the comma objection; it does not answer the absence of an official provenance chain.
The evidence is strongest when the tests remain separate
The central lesson of the MJ-12 anomaly debate is methodological. “Suspicious”, “probably forged” and “conclusively falsified by this feature” are three different claims.
The National Archives itself models that caution. After laying out its extensive list of problems with the Cutler-Twining memorandum, it explicitly distinguishes custody from authentication: certifying an archival reproduction establishes that it copies a document held by the Archives, not that the document or its contents are authentic.[National Archives]archives.govNational Archives Project BLUE BOOKNational ArchivesProject BLUE BOOK - Unidentified Flying Objects | National ArchivesJune 25, 2024… Finding a sheet in a federal box therefore answers where the sheet was found, not necessarily who originally created it.
Similarly, the FBI’s record that the Air Force determined the principal MJ-12 briefing document to be fake is substantial institutional evidence about its assessed authenticity, while the GAO’s finding that no evidence showed executive-branch origin seriously weakens the provenance claim.[FBI]vault.fbi.gov— Federal Bureau of InvestigationFBI — Federal Bureau of Investigation… Those conclusions should not be replaced with weaker popular arguments such as “the date looks strange”.
For readers assessing alleged MJ-12 documents, the soundest approach is therefore to rank anomalies by what they genuinely establish. Odd bureaucratic habits deserve limited weight. Multiple independent deviations deserve considerably more. A securely demonstrated historical impossibility can falsify a document outright. In the MJ-12 case, the cumulative record — anonymous provenance for the central briefing papers, archival irregularities surrounding the Cutler-Twining memorandum, lack of corroborating governmental records and potentially strong forensic problems such as the Truman-signature comparison — is much more consequential than any single disputed comma, phrase or formatting convention.
Amazon book picks
Further Reading
Books and field guides related to Which MJ 12 Anomalies Would Actually Prove Forgery?. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.
Top Secret/Majic: Operation Majestic-12 and the United States...
Top Secret/Majic is the result of nuclear physicist and renowned UFO investigator Stanton T. Friedman's twenty-one year search for the tr...
Forensic Document Examination: Principles and Practice
This book introduces the reader to the basic principles of handwriting and the factors that affect their development. The book discusses...
Scientific Examination of Questioned Documents
This guide to all aspects of a questioned document for attorneys, investigators, document examiners, and others covers the scientific exa...
eBay marketplace picks
Marketplace Samples
Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.
Selected fromUFO poster oneBay.co.uk.
Endnotes
1.
Source: archives.gov
Title: National Archives Project BLUE BOOK
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/military/air-force/ufos
Source snippet
National ArchivesProject BLUE BOOK - Unidentified Flying Objects | National ArchivesJune 25, 2024...
Published: June 25, 2024
2.
Source: vault.fbi.gov
Title: — Federal Bureau of Investigation
Link:https://vault.fbi.gov/search?SearchableText=Majestic
Source snippet
FBI — Federal Bureau of Investigation...
3.
Source: gao.gov
Title: [Comments on Majestic 12 Material] | U.S. GAO
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/154832
Source snippet
GAO[Comments on Majestic 12 Material] | U.S. GAO...
4.
Source: medium.com
Link:https://medium.com/stanton-friedmans-articles/update-on-operation-majestic-12-documents-ed2df58fd8a1
Source snippet
UPDATE ON OPERATION MAJESTIC 12 DOCUMENTS | by Richard Geldreich, Jr. | Physicist Stanton Friedman’s Articles | MediumJune 28, 2024...
Published: June 28, 2024
5.
Source: reaganlibrary.archives.gov
Link:https://reaganlibrary.archives.gov/public/2021-06/40-654-209237726-004-008-2021.pdf
6.
Source: gao.gov
Link:https://www.gao.gov/assets/154832.pdf
Source snippet
States General Accounting Offlce Washi...
7.
Source: d2r0txsugik6oi.cloudfront.net
Link:https://d2r0txsugik6oi.cloudfront.net/neon/resource/mufon/files/2015-02.pdf
8.
Source: medium.com
Link:https://medium.com/stanton-friedmans-articles/book-review-kevin-d-randles-case-mj-12-the-true-story-behind-the-government-s-ufo-conspiracies-9e06f4e82250
9.
Source: archives.gov
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/topics/uaps/rg-615
10.
Source: archives.gov
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/topics/uaps/rg-collections
11.
Source: archives.gov
Title: NAR A Privacy Act Systems: NARA 45 | National Archives
Link:https://www.archives.gov/privacy/inventory/nara-45
12.
Source: archives.gov
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/topics/uaps/faqs
13.
Source: archives.gov
Title: JF K Assassination Records
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/release-2022?order=File+Num&page=35&s=08&sort=desc
14.
Source: archives.gov
Title: JF K Assassination Records
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/release-2022?order=Num+Pages&os=wtmbzegmu5hwref%3Dapp&page=25&sort=asc
15.
Source: archives.gov
Title: decision table fy2016 0
Link:https://www.archives.gov/declassification/iscap/decision-table-fy2016-0
16.
Source: archives.gov
Title: Do Records Show Proof of UFOs? | National Archives
Link:https://www.archives.gov/news/articles/do-records-show-proof-of-ufos
17.
Source: archives.gov
Title: Records of Dr. John C. Cutler | National Archives
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/health/cdc-cutler-records
18.
Source: archives.gov
Title: decision table fy2016
Link:https://www.archives.gov/declassification/iscap/decision-table-fy2016
19.
Source: archives.gov
Title: Findings | National Archives
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/select-committee-report/part-1c.html
20.
Source: gao.gov
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/gao
21.
Source: gao.gov
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/gao
22.
Source: gao.gov
Title: b 308603
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/b-308603
23.
Source: gao.gov
Link:https://www.gao.gov/assets/a250690.html
24.
Source: gao.gov
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/b-235836
25.
Source: gao.gov
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/b-216218-0
26.
Source: gao.gov
Title: b 178528 lm
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/b-178528-lm
27.
Source: gao.gov
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/b-149372-1
28.
Source: gao.gov
Title: b 178528
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/b-178528
29.
Source: vault.fbi.gov
Link:https://vault.fbi.gov/unexplained-phenomenon/search
30.
Source: vault.fbi.gov
Link:https://vault.fbi.gov/search?SearchableText=Aircraft+Commander
31.
Source: vault.fbi.gov
Title: alphabetical listing collection
Link:https://vault.fbi.gov/alphabetical-listing-collection/?b_start%3Aint=1100
32.
Source: vault.fbi.gov
Link:https://vault.fbi.gov/search?SearchableText=Unknown&b_start%3Aint=630
33.
Source: vault.fbi.gov
Link:https://vault.fbi.gov/search?SearchableText=robert&b_start%3Aint=210
34.
Source: vault.fbi.gov
Link:https://vault.fbi.gov/search?created%3Adate%3Alist=1970%2F02%2F01%3A00%3A00+US%2FEastern&created_usage=range%3Amin&portal_type%3Alist=ATFile&portal_type%3Alist=ATImage&portal_type%3Alist=Document&portal_type%3Alist=Event&portal_type%3Alist=FDPS&portal_type%3Alist=Favorite&portal_type%3Alist=File&portal_type%3Alist=Folder&portal_type%3Alist=Image&portal_type%3Alist=Large+Plone+Folder&portal_type%3Alist=Link&portal_type%3Alist=News+Item&portal_type%3Alist=Topic&pt_toggle=%23&submit=Search
35.
Source: vault.fbi.gov
Link:https://vault.fbi.gov/search?SearchableText=blue+book&=&b_start%3Aint=1290
36.
Source: vault.fbi.gov
Link:https://vault.fbi.gov/search?SearchableText=blue+book&=&b_start%3Aint=870
37.
Source: vault.fbi.gov
Title: search?SearchableText=robert&b start:int=3390
Link:https://vault.fbi.gov/search%3FSearchableText%3Drobert%26b_start%3Aint%3D3390
38.
Source: vault.fbi.gov
Link:https://vault.fbi.gov/search?SearchableText=FBI&b_start%3Aint=90
39.
Source: vault.fbi.gov
Link:https://vault.fbi.gov/search?SearchableText=blue+book
40.
Source: gao.gov
Link:https://www.gao.gov/legal/other-legal-work/transferred-functions
41.
Source: gao.gov
Title: b 109426
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/b-109426
42.
Source: youtube.com
Title: A Secret History: Inside Shadow Intelligence, the MJ-12 Documents
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ogJplVuElLs
Source snippet
Majestic 12 | Secret Documents Expose UFO Cover-Up Vol. 1...
43.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Majestic 12 | Secret Documents Expose UFO Cover-Up Vol. 1
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s9VoC8MoeUs
Source snippet
The Majestic-12 Documents...
44.
Source: youtube.com
Title: The Majestic 12 Documents
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gk0UuRgKXgU
Source snippet
Stanton Friedman - Operation MJ 12...
45.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Stanton Friedman
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aE-ai0r-zZ4
Source snippet
Majestic 12 documents debunked forgery Majestic-12: Fraud or real evidence?...
46.
Source: theblackvault.com
Title: The Black Vault Update on Operation Majestic 12 Documents
Link:https://www.theblackvault.com/casefiles/update-on-operation-majestic-12-documents/
Source snippet
The Black VaultUpdate on Operation Majestic 12 Documents - The Black Vault Case Files...
47.
Source: lurch2.blogspot.com
Title: majestic 12
Link:https://lurch2.blogspot.com/2013/09/majestic-12.html
48.
Source: theblackvault.com
Title: new majestic 12 mj 12 briefing documents released june 2017
Link:https://www.theblackvault.com/casefiles/new-majestic-12-mj-12-briefing-documents-released-june-2017/
Published: june 2017
49.
Source: kevinrandle.blogspot.com
Link:https://kevinrandle.blogspot.com/2014/04/eisenhower-briefing-document-mj-12-and.html
50.
Source: kevinrandle.blogspot.com
Link:https://kevinrandle.blogspot.com/2014/03/ihave-argued-for-years-that-eisenhower.html
51.
Source: hyperboreanvibrations.blogspot.com
Link:https://hyperboreanvibrations.blogspot.com/2011/07/ufos-military-industrial-complex-and.html
52.
Source: uapcodex.org
Title: majestic 12 documents
Link:https://uapcodex.org/cases/majestic-12-documents/
53.
Source: internationalflyingsaucerbureau.com
Title: Majestic 12
Link:https://www.internationalflyingsaucerbureau.com/majestic-12/
54.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: Majestic 12
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Majestic_12
55.
Source: inamericanhistory.blogspot.com
Link:https://inamericanhistory.blogspot.com/2012/06/mj-12_22.html
56.
Source: en.wikisource.org
Title: MJ 12 Document
Link:https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/MJ-12_Document
Additional References
57.
Source: reddit.com
Link:https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1f8a4zc/extraordinary_top_secret_meeting_mentioned_cia/
58.
Source: historicalblindness.com
Link:https://www.historicalblindness.com/episodes//blind-spot-the-great-los-angeles-air-raid-and-the-secret-memos-of-majestic-12
59.
Source: exopaedia.org
Link:https://www.exopaedia.org/Eisenhower%2BBriefing%2BDocument
60.
Source: archive.org
Link:https://archive.org/stream/Dreamland_201801/Dreamland_djvu.txt
61.
Source: hangar1publishing.com
Link:https://hangar1publishing.com/blogs/ufos-uaps-and-aliens/majestic-12-documents?srsltid=AfmBOooVNFUGGee4ThBNhGJdQXBQxqOAMNTkobepNb-8SzYTojyhdesy
62.
Source: skepsis.nl
Link:https://skepsis.nl/majestic-12/
63.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/groups/DeusExUniHub/posts/4912482198799489/
64.
Source: bibliotecapleyades.net
Link:https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_mj12_10.htm
66.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/OMGTheWhyFiles/posts/the-real-purpose-behind-mj-12/1684237507045076/