Within Missing Records

What Did the GAO Actually Find About MJ 12 Records?

The GAO found that agencies knew MJ-12 from externally supplied papers, not from records located in their own government files.

133 sources 3 graphics
Preview for What Did the GAO Actually Find About MJ 12 Records?

On this page

  • Why the GAO examined Majestic 12 material
  • What agencies reported about their own files
  • Why the alleged AFOSI message failed as corroboration

Introduction

The US General Accounting Office (GAO) gave the Majestic 12 question an unusually direct government-records test in 1995. At the request of Representative Steven H. Schiff, GAO asked agencies that handled classified information, Air Force security matters and federal archives what they actually possessed concerning the publicly circulated MJ-12 papers. The answer was strikingly consistent: their knowledge came from material supplied by people outside government, not from independently located executive-branch records. GAO therefore reported that there was no evidence that the circulated MJ-12 material consisted of documents originally created within the executive branch.[Government Accountability Office]gao.govGovernment Accountability Office[Comments on Majestic 12 Material] | U.S. GAOGovernment Accountability Office[Comments on Majestic 12 Material] | U.S. GAO

GAO Findings illustration 1
Explanatory illustration 1

That finding is narrower than proving that no secret organisation called Majestic 12 could ever have existed. What it does establish is an important provenance problem. When Congress prompted another search for government documentation, the agencies concerned could not produce an official file copy, archival series or independently discovered record trail that authenticated the circulated papers. One seemingly promising exception — a 1980 Air Force Office of Special Investigations message mentioning “MJ Twelve” — failed the same test and was reported by AFOSI as a forgery.[Government Accountability Office]gao.govGovernment Accountability Office[Comments on Majestic 12 Material] | U.S. GAOGovernment Accountability Office[Comments on Majestic 12 Material] | U.S. GAO

GAO Findings illustration 3
Explanatory illustration 3

Why the GAO examined Majestic 12 material

The MJ-12 inquiry accompanied GAO’s larger investigation of federal records concerning the 1947 Roswell incident. That investigation, requested by Schiff, examined what records should have existed and what government records concerning Roswell could actually be located. GAO’s principal report, Government Records: Results of a Search for Records Concerning the 1947 Crash Near Roswell, New Mexico, was issued on 28 July 1995.[Government Accountability Office]gao.govnsiadGovernment Accountability OfficeGovernment Records: Results of a Search for Records Concerning the 1947 Crash Near Roswell, New Mexico |…

Majestic 12 required a distinct question. The publicly circulated papers purported to be highly classified government records dealing with UFO recovery procedures and the Roswell crash. Instead of simply accepting the documents’ markings or contents as evidence of official provenance, GAO asked relevant agencies for their views on authenticity. Its resulting two-page letter to Schiff dealt specifically with the MJ-12 material.[Government Accountability Office]gao.govGovernment Accountability Office[Comments on Majestic 12 Material] | U.S. GAOGovernment Accountability Office[Comments on Majestic 12 Material] | U.S. GAO

That distinction matters. GAO was not conducting a general investigation into every historical claim associated with MJ-12. Its inquiry was fundamentally a records-and-governance exercise: if these papers really represented highly classified executive-branch business, could the institutions responsible for classified-information oversight, Air Force security records and federal archives connect them to records in government custody?

The organisations consulted included the Information Security Oversight Office (ISOO), which oversees executive-branch systems for classified national-security information; the Office of the Secretary of the Air Force’s security and investigative apparatus; and the National Archives. According to GAO, these bodies had already been receiving questions about Majestic 12 from members of the public since the late 1980s.[Government Accountability Office]gao.govGovernment Accountability Office[Comments on Majestic 12 Material] | U.S. GAOGovernment Accountability Office[Comments on Majestic 12 Material] | U.S. GAO

The chronology is important because it rules out a simple misunderstanding about why MJ-12 material appeared in government hands. An agency possessing a photocopy because a researcher mailed it in is not the same thing as an agency discovering its own record copy in the files of the office supposedly responsible for creating, receiving or administering it. GAO’s investigation explicitly exposed that difference.

51:00

What agencies reported about their own files

GAO’s central finding was unusually plain: the agencies said their knowledge of Majestic 12 was limited to written material submitted by nongovernmental people. They reported finding no MJ-12 records in their own files, and GAO summarised their collective assessment as finding no evidence that the circulated material represented actual documents originating in the executive branch.[Government Accountability Office]gao.govGovernment Accountability Office[Comments on Majestic 12 Material] | U.S. GAOGovernment Accountability Office[Comments on Majestic 12 Material] | U.S. GAO

This is stronger than saying that officials merely declined to confirm a classified programme. The reported situation was that the government offices consulted did not identify an internally sourced MJ-12 record against which the circulated material could be authenticated.

The archival checks reinforced that problem. GAO reported that archivists at federal libraries had received public enquiries concerning Majestic 12 for years but, while searching related holdings including classified intelligence and National Security Council material, found nothing matching the description of the MJ-12 material or referring to that designation.[Government Accountability Office]gao.govGovernment Accountability Office[Comments on Majestic 12 Material] | U.S. GAOGovernment Accountability Office[Comments on Majestic 12 Material] | U.S. GAO

The National Archives’ own MJ-12 reference material supplies about the underlying archival picture. It says extensive searches were conducted among Air Force and Joint Chiefs of Staff records, while the Truman and Eisenhower presidential libraries searched their holdings for references to or copies of the alleged documents. Searches of National Security Council indexes under terms including “MJ-12” and “Majestic” were negative apart from the disputed 1954 Cutler-Twining memorandum.[National Archives]archives.govNational Archives Project BLUE BOOKNational ArchivesProject BLUE BOOK - Unidentified Flying Objects | National Archives…

Even that memorandum did not lead archivists to a surrounding MJ-12 file system. National Archives researchers searched records of the Secretary of Defense, Joint Chiefs of Staff, Headquarters US Air Force and related files without finding further information; enquiries to the Air Force, Joint Chiefs and National Security Council likewise produced no additional MJ-12 material. The Archives also notes that the folder containing the Cutler-Twining memorandum contains no other “NSC/MJ-12” documents.[National Archives]archives.govNational Archives Project BLUE BOOKNational ArchivesProject BLUE BOOK - Unidentified Flying Objects | National Archives…

For assessing provenance, this absence has a specific significance. The alleged MJ-12 papers describe high-level governmental activity, but the searches did not uncover the ordinary documentary connections that would independently place those papers inside an executive-branch records system: related correspondence, reference copies, indexed files, meeting documentation or other records discovered through official holdings rather than supplied by outside researchers.

That does not turn an unsuccessful records search into proof of non-existence. Government records can be lost, destroyed, misfiled, improperly retained or remain classified. Indeed, GAO’s broader Roswell investigation found that some records relating to Roswell Army Air Field activities had been destroyed without clear documentation explaining the authority for their destruction.[Intelligence Resource Program]irp.fas.orgIntelligence Resource Program GAOIntelligence Resource ProgramGAO - Government Records: Results of a Search for Records Concerning the 1947 Crash Near Roswell, New Mexico… The MJ-12 finding is therefore best understood as an authentication result: the investigation failed to establish an independent executive-branch provenance for the circulated material.

GAO Findings illustration 2
Explanatory illustration 2

Why the alleged AFOSI message failed as corroboration

One document encountered during the GAO inquiry initially looked potentially important because it seemed to offer exactly what the wider MJ-12 corpus lacked: a later government record using the relevant designation.

While reviewing material that members of the public had supplied to ISOO in connection with earlier Freedom of Information Act requests, GAO encountered a message dated 17 November 1980. It appeared to have originated in the Operations Division of the Air Force Office of Special Investigations (AFOSI) and contained the words “MJ Twelve”.[Google Groups]AFOSI reported that its earlier authenticity examination had classified the message as a forgery. Google GroupsOpen source on google.com.

But its location immediately raised the same provenance issue confronting the other MJ-12 papers. GAO had found the message among externally supplied material, not as an independently retrieved AFOSI record. It therefore contacted AFOSI and asked whether the message was authentic.

AFOSI’s Investigative Operations Center replied on 28 February 1995. According to GAO, a search of AFOSI files found no official record copy. AFOSI also told GAO that the document had already been examined during an earlier Freedom of Information Act request and that AFOSI had concluded it was a forgery.[Google Groups]AFOSI reported that its earlier authenticity examination had classified the message as a forgery. Google GroupsOpen source on google.com.

That sequence makes the 1980 message especially instructive. Merely finding a document in material held by a federal agency does not establish that the agency created it. The relevant evidential chain was:

55:35
  1. the paper appeared to bear an AFOSI origin;
  2. GAO encountered it in material previously submitted from outside government;
  3. GAO went to the purported originating organisation;
  4. AFOSI searched for its own official record copy and found none; and
  5. AFOSI reported that its earlier authenticity examination had classified the message as a forgery. Google Groups

The message therefore did not supply the missing independent government link. Instead, it illustrated why provenance matters: a purported government document can enter government custody through a public enquiry without thereby becoming evidence that it originated inside government.

There is a useful parallel in the FBI’s handling of other MJ-12 material. The FBI says that two of its offices received versions of an “Operation Majestic-12” memorandum in 1

9

8

  1. After consulting the Air Force, the document was determined to be fake; the FBI’s released file itself records the case as bogus. This is separate from GAO’s 1995 AFOSI-message check, but it demonstrates the same evidential distinction between an agency possessing a submitted MJ-12 paper and possessing an authenticated record created through official channels. FBI

What the GAO finding actually establishes

The strongest reading of the 1995 inquiry is also the most carefully bounded one. GAO did not announce that it had proved, in an absolute historical sense, that no secret MJ-12 organisation could ever have existed. Its documented conclusion concerned the provenance and corroboration of the material presented as Majestic 12 records.

Within that boundary, the results were consistently adverse to authentication. The relevant agencies said their MJ-12 knowledge derived from papers supplied by nongovernmental people. They could not identify corresponding records in their files. Federal archival searches did not reveal an independent body of Majestic 12 documentation. And when GAO tested the apparent 1980 AFOSI message directly against the records of its supposed originating organisation, no official copy emerged and AFOSI reported the document as forged. Government Accountability Office

This makes the 1995 investigation important to the wider missing-corroborating-records problem. It created a second-order test of the MJ-12 story: rather than asking whether a photocopy looked official, GAO asked whether government institutions could connect the circulated papers to their own documentary systems. They could not.

The National Archives’ findings point in the same direction. Its searches reached records of the Air Force, Joint Chiefs, Secretary of Defense and National Security Council, as well as the Truman and Eisenhower presidential libraries. The surviving Cutler-Twining memorandum remains an archival anomaly rather than the anchor of a corroborating MJ-12 record series: related searches failed to produce the administrative trail that would independently explain or substantiate it. National Archives

For readers assessing the alleged MJ-12 documents, that is the durable significance of the GAO inquiry. The problem is not merely that investigators failed to locate one hypothetical “master file”. In 1995, agencies were explicitly asked about material already circulating under the Majestic 12 name, and their answers traced their knowledge back to outside submissions rather than executive-branch originals. The one additional paper that appeared capable of breaking that pattern — the AFOSI “MJ Twelve” message — instead reproduced it. The government had encountered MJ-12 documents, but GAO found no evidence showing that the disputed material had originated as genuine executive-branch records. Government Accountability Office

Amazon book picks

Further Reading

Books and field guides related to What Did the GAO Actually Find About MJ 12 Records?. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.

eBay marketplace picks

Marketplace Samples

Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.

UsingUSA

Selected fromUFO poster oneBay.co.uk.

Endnotes

1. Source: gao.gov
Title: Government Accountability Office[Comments on Majestic 12 Material] | U.S. GAO
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/154832

3. Source: gao.gov
Title: nsiad 95 187
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/nsiad

Source snippet

Government Accountability OfficeGovernment Records: Results of a Search for Records Concerning the 1947 Crash Near Roswell, New Mexico |...

4. Source: archives.gov
Title: National Archives Project BLUE BOOK
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/military/air-force/ufos

Source snippet

National ArchivesProject BLUE BOOK - Unidentified Flying Objects | National Archives...

6. Source: vault.fbi.gov
Title: Majestic 12 Part 1 of 1
Link:https://vault.fbi.gov/Majestic%2012/Majestic%2012%20Part%2001%20%28Final%29/at_download/file

Source snippet

Majestic 12 Part 1 of 1...

7. Source: archives.gov
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/topics/uaps/presidential-libraries

8. Source: archives.gov
Title: Do Records Show Proof of UFOs? | National Archives
Link:https://www.archives.gov/news/articles/do-records-show-proof-of-ufos

9. Source: archives.fbi.gov
Title: ufos 040610
Link:https://archives.fbi.gov/archives/news/stories/2010/april/ufos_040610

10. Source: archives.fbi.gov
Title: myths 072408
Link:https://archives.fbi.gov/archives/news/stories/2008/july/myths_072408

11. Source: groups.google.com
Title: Zvp N5RJVi FI
Link:https://groups.google.com/g/alt.alien.research/c/ZvpN5RJViFI

12. Source: gao.gov
Title: osi 95 9
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/osi

13. Source: books.google.com
Title: Government Records
Link:https://books.google.com/books/about/Government_Records.html?id=t4fL5KNU3uwC

14. Source: gao.gov
Title: nsiad 90 195
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/nsiad

15. Source: vault.fbi.gov
Link:https://vault.fbi.gov/search?SearchableText=Unknown&b_start%3Aint=630

16. Source: vault.fbi.gov
Title: alphabetical listing collection
Link:https://vault.fbi.gov/alphabetical-listing-collection?b_start%3Aint=1100

17. Source: vault.fbi.gov
Link:https://vault.fbi.gov/search?SearchableText=Majestic

18. Source: vault.fbi.gov
Link:https://vault.fbi.gov/search?SearchableText=blue+book&amp=&b_start%3Aint=870

19. Source: vault.fbi.gov
Title: atct topic view
Link:https://vault.fbi.gov/alphabetical-listing-collection/atct_topic_view?-C=&amp%3Alist=&b_start%3Aint=1100

20. Source: vault.fbi.gov
Link:https://vault.fbi.gov/search?SearchableText=blue+book&amp=&b_start%3Aint=1290

21. Source: vault.fbi.gov
Title: atct topic view
Link:https://vault.fbi.gov/alphabetical-listing-collection/atct_topic_view?b_start%3Aint=1100

22. Source: vault.fbi.gov
Link:https://vault.fbi.gov/search?SearchableText=FBI&amp=&b_start%3Aint=210

23. Source: vault.fbi.gov
Link:https://vault.fbi.gov/search?SearchableText=robert&b_start%3Aint=2910

24. Source: vault.fbi.gov
Link:https://vault.fbi.gov/Majestic%2012/Majestic%2012%20Part%2001%20%28Final%29/view

25. Source: vault.fbi.gov
Title: Majestic 12
Link:https://vault.fbi.gov/Majestic%2012/

26. Source: vault.fbi.gov
Link:https://vault.fbi.gov/search?SearchableText=Name

27. Source: vault.fbi.gov
Title: Majestic 12
Link:https://vault.fbi.gov/Majestic%2012/?%24NMW_TRANS%24=ext

28. Source: vault.fbi.gov
Link:https://vault.fbi.gov/search?SearchableText=Aircraft+Commander

29. Source: vault.fbi.gov
Link:https://vault.fbi.gov/search?SearchableText=robert&amp=&b_start%3Aint=2700

30. Source: youtube.com
Title: Congressman Steven Schiff
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J0-itHJNgbY

Source snippet

Majestic 12 | Secret Documents Expose UFO Cover-Up Vol. 1...

31. Source: youtube.com
Title: Majestic 12 | Secret Documents Expose UFO Cover-Up Vol. 1
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s9VoC8MoeUs

Source snippet

The Truth about Roswell: Decoding Decades of Deception...

32. Source: irp.fas.org
Title: Intelligence Resource Program GAO
Link:https://irp.fas.org/gao/nsi95187.htm

Source snippet

Intelligence Resource ProgramGAO - Government Records: Results of a Search for Records Concerning the 1947 Crash Near Roswell, New Mexico...

33. Source: en.ikwipedia.org
Title: Roswell incident
Link:https://en.ikwipedia.org/wiki/Roswell_incident

34. Source: majesticdocuments.com
Title: Freedom of Information Act | Majestic Documents
Link:https://majesticdocuments.com/documents/official-ufo-documents/freedom-of-information-act/

35. Source: phatsoheff.tripod.com
Link:https://phatsoheff.tripod.com/ufo.html

36. Source: project1947.com
Link:https://www.project1947.com/roswell/schiff.htm

37. Source: sgp.fas.org
Link:https://sgp.fas.org/othergov/roswell.html

38. Source: ro.scribd.com
Link:https://ro.scribd.com/document/472644084/196986

39. Source: scribd.com
Title: Majestic 12
Link:https://www.scribd.com/document/1606041/Majestic-12

40. Source: internationalflyingsaucerbureau.com
Title: Majestic 12
Link:https://www.internationalflyingsaucerbureau.com/majestic-12/

41. Source: juntacomercial.pr.gov.br
Title: ATO S DECISÓRIOS
Link:https://www.juntacomercial.pr.gov.br/Pagina/ATOS-DECISORIOS-JULHO-2022

42. Source: en.wikisource.org
Title: MJ 12 Document
Link:https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/MJ-12_Document

43. Source: disclosdex.com
Title: Majestic 12 | Disclosdex
Link:https://disclosdex.com/organizations/majestic-12

Additional References

44. Source: youtube.com
Title: Karl Pflock
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8g5tYfcQ9RQ

Source snippet

GAO Roswell investigation Steven Schiff Congressman Steven Schiff - The Accidental Whistleblower...

45. Source: nsa.gov
Link:https://www.nsa.gov/Helpful-Links/NSA-FOIA/Declassification-Transparency-Initiatives/FOIA-Reports-and-Releases/FOIA-Reports-and-Releases-List/igphoto/2002761373/

46. Source: nsa.gov
Link:https://www.nsa.gov/Press-Room/Digital-Media-Center/Document-Gallery/igphoto/2002761373/

47. Source: medium.com
Link:https://medium.com/[stanton-friedmans

48. Source: broadwaybaby.com
Link:https://www.broadwaybaby.com/latest-reviews

49. Source: muckrock.com
Link:https://www.muckrock.com/news/archives/2017/jun/05/fbi-majestic-12/

50. Source: scribd.com
Link:https://www.scribd.com/document/798359998/Dis-Document-Snowbird

51. Source: studylib.net
Link:https://studylib.net/doc/28093608/empire-of-ai—dreams-and-nightmares-in-sam-altmans-openai

52. Source: studystack.com
Link:https://www.studystack.com/flashcard-349063

53. Source: studylib.net
Link:https://studylib.net/doc/9820999/2.-%25E2%2580%2593-birdplay.—wordpress.com