Within Air Force
Why Is the Cutler Twining Memo So Controversial?
The surviving Cutler-Twining memorandum became a key test case because archival irregularities raised independent doubts about the MJ-12 documentary trail.
On this page
- Why the memorandum became important to MJ 12 claims
- The archival anomalies documented by federal researchers
- What those anomalies add to the 1988 Air Force finding
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
The Cutler-Twining memorandum complicates MJ-12 authentication because it looks, at first, like the kind of corroboration the alleged Majestic documents badly needed: unlike the anonymously supplied photographic material that launched the controversy, this one-page memorandum was actually found among US Air Force records held by the National Archives. Dated 14 July 1954, it refers explicitly to an “NSC/MJ-12 Special Studies Project” briefing involving General Nathan Twining.[National Archives]archives.govNational Archives Project BLUE BOOKNational ArchivesProject BLUE BOOK - Unidentified Flying Objects | National ArchivesJune 25, 2024…
Yet archival custody is not the same thing as authenticated provenance. National Archives researchers subsequently documented a striking collection of irregularities: the memorandum lacked the register number expected in its series, stood alone in its folder, carried a classification marking inconsistent with Eisenhower-era National Security Council practice, had no supporting record trail, and referred to a meeting that could not be located in contemporary presidential or NSC records. Robert Cutler was also abroad when the memorandum was supposedly issued.[National Archives]archives.govNational Archives Project BLUE BOOKNational ArchivesProject BLUE BOOK - Unidentified Flying Objects | National ArchivesJune 25, 2024…
That makes the Cutler-Twining memo unusually important to the 1988 Air Force finding that the MJ-12 material was fabricated. Its physical presence in a federal archive does not rescue the MJ-12 documentary case; instead, it demonstrates why the distinction between where a document was found and whether it entered government files through an authentic administrative process is crucial.
Why the memorandum became so important
The memorandum purports to be a short administrative message from Robert Cutler, President Dwight D. Eisenhower’s Special Assistant for National Security Affairs, to Air Force Chief of Staff General Nathan F. Twining. Its subject is given as “NSC/MJ-12 Special Studies Project”. The text says that the President had decided an MJ-12 briefing should take place during an already scheduled White House meeting on 16 July rather than afterwards. Significantly, the document does not explain what MJ-12 was or say anything about UFOs, Roswell, extraterrestrial craft or recovered bodies.[National Archives]archives.govNational Archives Project BLUE BOOKNational ArchivesProject BLUE BOOK - Unidentified Flying Objects | National ArchivesJune 25, 2024…
Its evidential importance therefore came less from what it disclosed than from where it appeared. The principal MJ-12 papers had an intrinsically difficult provenance: the supposed Eisenhower briefing material reached researcher Jaime Shandera anonymously on 35 mm film rather than through an identifiable government file. The Cutler-Twining memorandum, by contrast, was reported found by Shandera and William Moore while searching declassified Air Force material at the National Archives in 1985.[The UFO Chronicles]theufochronicles.comthe myth of mj 12 appendix pt 2The UFO ChroniclesThe Myth of MJ-12: Appendix A –Pt 2June 29, 2014…
If the memorandum had demonstrably belonged to that archival series since the 1950s, its significance would have been considerable. An independently preserved government record mentioning “MJ-12” would provide corroboration separate from the anonymously circulated papers. It would not by itself prove the more extraordinary claims attributed to MJ-12, because the memo never defines the project, but it could establish that the designation existed within Eisenhower-era government business.
The problem is that the National Archives could establish the memorandum’s location without establishing that history. This distinction is explicit in the Archives’ own guidance: when it certifies a reproduction, it certifies that the reproduction is a true copy of an item in its custody; it does not authenticate either the document itself or the information it contains.[National Archives]archives.govNational Archives Project BLUE BOOKNational ArchivesProject BLUE BOOK - Unidentified Flying Objects | National ArchivesJune 25, 2024…
The Cutler-Twining memo is therefore better described as an archivally located document of disputed provenance than simply as an “authenticated National Archives document”.
The archival anomalies documented by federal researchers
The National Archives’ 1987 MJ-12 reference report is particularly valuable because its objections are not primarily judgements about whether UFOs exist. They concern ordinary archival expectations: filing systems, classification markings, paper, associated records, meeting documentation and administrative chronology. Taken together, those checks make the Cutler-Twining memorandum a much more difficult piece of evidence than its archival location initially suggests.[National Archives]archives.govNational Archives Project BLUE BOOKNational ArchivesProject BLUE BOOK - Unidentified Flying Objects | National ArchivesJune 25, 2024…
Its filing position did not provide a normal documentary trail. The memorandum was found in Record Group 341, entry 267, in a series organised by Top Secret register number, yet it had no such number. It was filed in folder T4-1846, but the Archives reported that there were no other documents in that folder concerning “NSC/MJ-12”. Searches of records belonging to the Secretary of Defense, Joint Chiefs of Staff, Headquarters US Air Force and related holdings produced no additional information. Enquiries to the Air Force, Joint Chiefs and National Security Council were similarly unsuccessful.[National Archives]archives.govNational Archives Project BLUE BOOKNational ArchivesProject BLUE BOOK - Unidentified Flying Objects | National ArchivesJune 25, 2024…
That is a provenance problem rather than merely an absence-of-evidence argument. A genuine high-level memorandum normally exists within a documentary ecosystem: incoming and outgoing copies, registers, related correspondence, meeting records, office files or subsequent references. Extreme secrecy could remove some of those traces, but the Cutler-Twining memo’s difficulty is cumulative — the expected traces are missing in several independently relevant record systems.
Its security marking raised a chronological problem. The memorandum carries “Top Secret Restricted” and “Security Information” wording. According to the National Archives, the National Security Council’s Freedom of Information Office reported that the “Top Secret Restricted Information” marking did not enter use there until the Nixon administration. The Eisenhower Presidential Library likewise told the Archives that the particular marking was not used during Eisenhower’s administration.[National Archives]archives.govNational Archives Project BLUE BOOKNational ArchivesProject BLUE BOOK - Unidentified Flying Objects | National ArchivesJune 25, 2024…
For authentication, that is more consequential than a simple typographical oddity. Classification markings were products of administrative systems and periods. An apparent anachronism therefore asks the defender of a document to explain why an alleged 1954 presidential-security memorandum exhibits a convention that the responsible institutions associated with a later administration.
The physical document did not settle the issue either. A National Archives conservation specialist examined the sheet and identified it as a ribbon copy prepared on onionskin paper. The Archives also compared it with representative Cutler material held by the Eisenhower Library. According to the resulting reference report, Cutler’s NSC documents in the sample used characteristic paper and watermark practices, while most outgoing NSC documents were prepared on White House letterhead. The disputed memorandum had neither official government letterhead nor a watermark.[National Archives]archives.govNational Archives Project BLUE BOOKNational ArchivesProject BLUE BOOK - Unidentified Flying Objects | National ArchivesJune 25, 2024…
None of those features, considered alone, mathematically proves forgery. Offices make exceptions, copies can differ from originals and incomplete archival series are commonplace. Their importance lies in convergence: the physical form does not compensate for the filing and administrative anomalies by supplying an unmistakable mark of origin.
The date creates a second authentication test
The memorandum is dated 14 July 1954, but Robert Cutler was not in Washington that day. The Eisenhower Library established that he was visiting military installations in Europe and North Africa between 3 and 15 July. The NSC staff records also contain Cutler’s instructions to James S. Lay and J. Patrick Coyne concerning the handling of NSC business while he was absent.[National Archives]archives.govNational Archives Project BLUE BOOKNational ArchivesProject BLUE BOOK - Unidentified Flying Objects | National ArchivesJune 25, 2024…
This fact is important but needs careful interpretation. Cutler’s absence does not, by itself, prove that the memorandum is false. An assistant could have produced routine correspondence in his name while he was travelling. MJ-12 defender Stanton Friedman made essentially that counterargument, pointing to Cutler’s instructions to Lay to keep work moving and arguing that the absence of Cutler’s signature is consistent with a memorandum produced while Cutler was overseas.[The Black Vault]theblackvault.comThe Black Vault Update on Operation Majestic 12 DocumentsThe Black VaultUpdate on Operation Majestic 12 Documents - The Black Vault Case FilesJanuary 17, 2024…
That defence illustrates why the Cutler-Twining dispute cannot fairly be reduced to a single “gotcha” anomaly. It offers a conceivable mechanism by which genuine correspondence could have been generated despite Cutler’s absence.
But it does not restore ordinary provenance. The National Archives and Eisenhower Library noted that if staff members Lay or Coyne had prepared the memorandum during Cutler’s absence, one would expect their involvement to be reflected in its execution. More importantly, explaining who could have typed a memorandum is different from demonstrating who did type it. No contemporary transmitting record, office copy or associated file identified by the federal searches establishes that chain.[National Archives]archives.govNational Archives Project BLUE BOOKNational ArchivesProject BLUE BOOK - Unidentified Flying Objects | National ArchivesJune 25, 2024…
The distinction matters: an authentication case becomes much stronger when an apparent anomaly can be resolved with surviving records, rather than with a historically possible reconstruction.
The supposed 16 July briefing leaves no matching footprint
The memorandum’s central claim creates another opportunity for independent verification. It says an MJ-12 briefing would occur during an “already scheduled White House meeting” on 16 July 1954. Federal researchers therefore checked the records where such activity might reasonably appear.
The National Archives found no National Security Council meeting on that date and no reference to MJ-12 or Majestic in the NSC meeting minutes for July 1954. A broader search of NSC indices found no entries for MJ-12, Majestic, unidentified flying objects, UFOs, flying saucers or flying discs. The NSC declassification office also reported no record of declassification action involving the disputed memorandum or other documents concerning the alleged project.[National Archives]archives.govNational Archives Project BLUE BOOKNational ArchivesProject BLUE BOOK - Unidentified Flying Objects | National ArchivesJune 25, 2024…
The Eisenhower Library supplied an especially useful comparison. It reported that the President’s appointment books contained no entry for a special 16 July meeting that might have included an MJ-12 briefing and observed that even “off the record” meetings normally left appointment-book entries giving their time and participants.[National Archives]archives.govNational Archives Project BLUE BOOKNational ArchivesProject BLUE BOOK - Unidentified Flying Objects | National ArchivesJune 25, 2024…
The surviving appointment book itself supports the importance of that observation. Eisenhower’s schedule for Friday, 16 July records ordinary and off-the-record engagements rather than simply omitting sensitive or informal activity wholesale.[Eisenhower Presidential Library]eisenhowerlibrary.govEisenhower Presidential Library THE PRESIIENT'SEisenhower Presidential Library THE PRESIIENT'S
There is nevertheless a limit to this argument. The Cutler-Twining text says “White House meeting”, not explicitly “National Security Council meeting”, so failure to find an NSC meeting is not a perfect textual contradiction. Defenders have used precisely this point to argue that investigators were searching for something the memorandum never claimed.[Medium]medium.comOpen source on medium.com.
Even after granting that distinction, however, the authentication difficulty remains. Searches across presidential appointment records, NSC records and other relevant federal holdings failed to produce the independent documentary partner that would turn the memo’s vague reference into a verifiable historical event. The absence is therefore best treated as failed corroboration, rather than proof that no conceivable secret briefing could have occurred.
Why being in the National Archives is not enough
The most revealing feature of the Cutler-Twining controversy is the tension between custody and provenance. The National Archives unquestionably held the memorandum. What its investigation could not supply was a secure chain showing that the memorandum had been created by the purported office in 1954, processed through the appropriate record system and transferred to archival custody as part of the normal government record.
This explains the otherwise puzzling position in which both sides of the MJ-12 debate could agree on an important point: the physical archival discovery was unusual. Some defenders argued that the memo might have been inserted by somebody within government, while critics treated its anomalous placement as evidence of a planted forgery. The same observation therefore supports radically different stories about why the paper was there, but neither story turns its mere presence in a government box into proof of authentic authorship.[Crystalinks]crystalinks.comMajestic 12, Project Grudge, Project Bluebook, Trilateral CommissionMajestic 12, Project Grudge, Project Bluebook, Trilateral Commission
There is also a methodological trap here. If archival placement is accepted as proof of authenticity, the anomalies become difficult to explain. But if the anomalies are answered by proposing that an authorised insider deliberately placed an exceptionally secret document where ordinary filing rules did not apply, archival placement can no longer serve as straightforward independent corroboration. The argument becomes dependent on an additional, undocumented scenario.
That is why the National Archives’ qualification about certification is so consequential. A researcher can obtain an official copy of the Cutler-Twining memorandum and truthfully say that the copied sheet resides in federal custody. The Archives’ seal still does not certify that Robert Cutler’s office created it, that President Eisenhower ordered the briefing, or that an MJ-12 organisation existed.[National Archives]archives.govNational Archives Project BLUE BOOKNational ArchivesProject BLUE BOOK - Unidentified Flying Objects | National ArchivesJune 25, 2024…
What the memo adds to the 1988 Air Force finding
The Cutler-Twining case strengthens the significance of the Air Force’s later fake-document determination without making that determination more detailed than the surviving record permits. The 1988 AFOSI conclusion addressed MJ-12 material as fabricated; the Cutler-Twining research provides a separate archival reason for caution about one of the documents that appeared capable of corroborating the larger MJ-12 story.
The key point is cumulative rather than absolute. By 1987, federal archivists had already found that the supposed archival corroboration suffered from an unexplained filing position, missing Top Secret register number, unsupported security marking, lack of associated MJ-12 records, no corresponding NSC record trail, no identified presidential appointment matching the alleged briefing, unresolved paper and formatting questions, and the absence abroad of the official in whose name it was issued.[National Archives]archives.govNational Archives Project BLUE BOOKNational ArchivesProject BLUE BOOK - Unidentified Flying Objects | National ArchivesJune 25, 2024…
Those findings matter because they are largely independent of the better-known forensic criticisms directed at the anonymously circulated MJ-12 papers. The Cutler-Twining memorandum had an apparent advantage those papers lacked — a tangible sheet in the National Archives — yet that advantage weakened substantially once archivists investigated how well the sheet fitted its claimed historical setting.
The result is not that every irregularity independently proves forgery. Several have conceivable counter-explanations, and defenders have supplied them: staff could have acted for Cutler while he was abroad; a secret briefing need not have been described explicitly in an appointment book; unusual documents can survive without complete supporting files.[The Black Vault]theblackvault.comThe Black Vault Update on Operation Majestic 12 DocumentsThe Black VaultUpdate on Operation Majestic 12 Documents - The Black Vault Case FilesJanuary 17, 2024…
Authentication, however, normally becomes stronger as independent checks converge positively. Here they repeatedly failed to do so. The memorandum’s content could not be corroborated elsewhere; its classification treatment raised an anachronism; its filing context was anomalous; and its alleged administrative event left no identified contemporary counterpart. The defence therefore depends heavily on explaining exceptions rather than producing a secure provenance trail.
That is the Cutler-Twining memorandum’s central importance to the MJ-12 controversy. It initially seemed capable of converting an anonymous set of extraordinary documents into a claim supported by the federal archives. The National Archives’ investigation instead showed why archival discovery and historical authentication are different things. In the context of the Air Force’s subsequent fabrication finding, the memorandum does not provide a clean exception to the official rejection of MJ-12. It provides an unusually well-documented example of why that documentary trail remained suspect.[National Archives]archives.govNational Archives Project BLUE BOOKNational ArchivesProject BLUE BOOK - Unidentified Flying Objects | National ArchivesJune 25, 2024…
Amazon book picks
Further Reading
Books and field guides related to Why Is the Cutler Twining Memo So Controversial?. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.
Top Secret/Majic: Operation Majestic-12 and the United States...
Top Secret/Majic is the result of nuclear physicist and renowned UFO investigator Stanton T. Friedman's twenty-one year search for the tr...
UFOs and the National Security State: Chronology of a Cover-U...
Included in this volume are the records of more than fifty military bases relating to innumerable violations of sensitive airspace by unk...
Forensic Document Examination: Principles and Practice
This book introduces the reader to the basic principles of handwriting and the factors that affect their development. The book discusses...
Archives: Principles and Practices
This new and extensively revised second edition offers an international perspective on archives management, providing authoritative guida...
eBay marketplace picks
Marketplace Samples
Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.
Selected fromUFO poster oneBay.co.uk.
Endnotes
1.
Source: archives.gov
Title: National Archives Project BLUE BOOK
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/military/air-force/ufos
Source snippet
National ArchivesProject BLUE BOOK - Unidentified Flying Objects | National ArchivesJune 25, 2024...
Published: June 25, 2024
2.
Source: reaganlibrary.archives.gov
Link:https://reaganlibrary.archives.gov/public/2021-06/40-654-209237726-004-008-2021.pdf
3.
Source: medium.com
Link:https://medium.com/stanton-friedmans-articles/book-review-kevin-d-randles-case-mj-12-the-true-story-behind-the-government-s-ufo-conspiracies-9e06f4e82250
4.
Source: crystalinks.com
Title: Majestic 12, Project Grudge, Project Bluebook, Trilateral Commission
Link:https://www.crystalinks.com/mj12.html
5.
Source: archives.gov
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/topics/uaps/presidential-libraries
6.
Source: archives.gov
Title: rg26 vesseldoc tampa
Link:https://www.archives.gov/atlanta/finding-aids/rg26_vesseldoc_tampa.html
7.
Source: archives.gov
Title: R G 21
Link:https://www.archives.gov/atlanta/finding-aids/rg21-2363797
8.
Source: archives.gov
Title: Do Records Show Proof of UFOs? | National Archives
Link:https://www.archives.gov/news/articles/do-records-show-proof-of-ufos
9.
Source: archives.gov
Title: ¿Registros muestran prueba de ovnis? | National Archives
Link:https://www.archives.gov/espanol/ovnis
10.
Source: trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov
Title: remarks president trump president xi china joint press statement beijing china
Link:https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefings-statements/remarks-president-trump-president-xi-china-joint-press-statement-beijing-china/
11.
Source: archive.ph
Title: Cult of National Security Trolls: Art Bell and Coast to Coast AM Analyzed
Link:https://archive.ph/eQwT6
12.
Source: uscode.house.gov
Link:https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?edition=2007&req=granuleid%3AUSC-2007-title28a-node251
13.
Source: archives.gov
Link:https://www.archives.gov/publications/prologue/index/2009.html
14.
Source: georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov
Link:https://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/nsc/text/history.html
15.
Source: time.com
Title: TH E ADMINISTRATION: Bostonian at Work
Link:https://time.com/archive/6620437/the-administration-bostonian-at-work/
16.
Source: eisenhowerlibrary.gov
Title: Eisenhower Presidential Library THE PRESIIENT’S
Link:https://www.eisenhowerlibrary.gov/sites/default/files/research/online-documents/presidential-appointment-books/1954/july-1954.pdf
17.
Source: theufochronicles.com
Title: the myth of mj 12 appendix pt 2
Link:https://www.theufochronicles.com/2014/06/the-myth-of-mj-12-appendix-pt-2.html
Source snippet
The UFO ChroniclesThe Myth of MJ-12: Appendix A –Pt 2June 29, 2014...
Published: June 29, 2014
18.
Source: theblackvault.com
Title: The Black Vault Update on Operation Majestic 12 Documents
Link:https://www.theblackvault.com/casefiles/update-on-operation-majestic-12-documents/
Source snippet
The Black VaultUpdate on Operation Majestic 12 Documents - The Black Vault Case FilesJanuary 17, 2024...
Published: January 17, 2024
19.
Source: theufochronicles.com
Link:https://www.theufochronicles.com/2014/10/mj-12-no-proof-that-tf-ct-or-ebd.html
20.
Source: govinfo.gov
Link:https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/CRI-2026/CRI-2026-COMMITTEE-ON-ETHICS-AA8F9F/context
21.
Source: wikidisc.org
Title: Nathan F. Twining | Wiki Disc
Link:https://www.wikidisc.org/wiki/Nathan_F._Twining
22.
Source: eisenhowerlibrary.gov
Title: Presidential Appointment Books | Eisenhower Presidential Library
Link:https://www.eisenhowerlibrary.gov/research/presidential-appointment-books
23.
Source: eisenhowerlibrary.gov
Title: Picture Puzzles | Eisenhower Presidential Library
Link:https://www.eisenhowerlibrary.gov/education-activity-center/picture-puzzles
24.
Source: eisenhowerlibrary.gov
Title: Awards & Medals | Eisenhower Presidential Library
Link:https://www.eisenhowerlibrary.gov/all_about_ike/army_years.html
25.
Source: eisenhowerlibrary.gov
Title: Robert Culter and the Lavender Scare | Eisenhower Presidential Library
Link:https://www.eisenhowerlibrary.gov/press-releases/robert-culter-and-lavender-scare
26.
Source: theufochronicles.com
Title: The Majestic Documents: A Forensic Linguistic Report (Pt 1)
Link:https://www.theufochronicles.com/2014/11/the-majestic-documents-forensic.html?showComment=1415301297753
27.
Source: theufochronicles.com
Title: the myth of mj 12 appendix pt 1
Link:https://www.theufochronicles.com/2014/06/the-myth-of-mj-12-appendix-pt-1.html
28.
Source: theufochronicles.com
Title: “Appendix A: The Myth of MJ-12” An Annotated Commentary By Barry Greenwood
Link:https://www.theufochronicles.com/2014/06/appendix-the-myth-of-mj-12-annotated.html
29.
Source: lurch2.blogspot.com
Title: majestic 12
Link:https://lurch2.blogspot.com/2013/09/majestic-12.html
30.
Source: dfat.gov.au
Link:https://www.dfat.gov.au/about-us/publications/Pages/records-disposal-authority
31.
Source: govinfo.gov
Link:https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/CRI-1991/CRI-1991-CONGRESSIONAL-MEDAL-OF-HONOR-SOCIE-36F3AF/context
32.
Source: col2.com
Title: operation majestic 12
Link:https://www.col2.com/operation-majestic-12
33.
Source: ns2.col2.com
Title: operation majestic 12
Link:https://ns2.col2.com/operation-majestic-12
34.
Source: scribd.com
Title: Majestic 12
Link:https://www.scribd.com/document/1606041/Majestic-12
35.
Source: fr.scribd.com
Title: Majestic 12
Link:https://fr.scribd.com/document/1606041/Majestic-12
36.
Source: uapcodex.org
Title: majestic 12 documents
Link:https://uapcodex.org/cases/majestic-12-documents/
37.
Source: vault.fbi.gov
Title: Majestic 12
Link:https://vault.fbi.gov/Majestic%2012/
38.
Source: eisenhowerlibrary.gov
Link:https://www.eisenhowerlibrary.gov/research/finding-aids/white-house-office-office-special-assistant-national-security-affairs-robert
39.
Source: eisenhowerlibrary.gov
Link:https://www.eisenhowerlibrary.gov/search/%E9%BB%91%E7%9A%AE%E4%B9%A6bt?page=1
40.
Source: eisenhowerlibrary.gov
Title: cutler robert
Link:https://www.eisenhowerlibrary.gov/research/finding-aids/cutler-robert
41.
Source: eisenhowerlibrary.gov
Title: Finding Aids | Eisenhower Presidential Library FINDING AIDS Displaying 51
Link:https://www.eisenhowerlibrary.gov/research/finding-aids?page=1
42.
Source: eisenhowerlibrary.gov
Title: Finding Aids | Eisenhower Presidential Library FINDING AIDS Displaying 551
Link:https://www.eisenhowerlibrary.gov/research/finding-aids?page=11
43.
Source: eisenhowerlibrary.gov
Title: Declassified Documents
Link:https://www.eisenhowerlibrary.gov/research/online-documents/declassified-documents-fiscal-year-2015
44.
Source: eisenhowerlibrary.gov
Link:https://www.eisenhowerlibrary.gov/search/visit?page=57
45.
Source: eisenhowerlibrary.gov
Title: Declassified Documents
Link:https://www.eisenhowerlibrary.gov/research/online-documents/declassified-documents-fiscal-year-2014
46.
Source: internationalflyingsaucerbureau.com
Title: Majestic 12
Link:https://www.internationalflyingsaucerbureau.com/majestic-12/
47.
Source: presidency.ucsb.edu
Link:https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/app-categories/presidential?items_per_page=20&page=3341
48.
Source: majestic.fandom.com
Title: Special Studies Project
Link:https://majestic.fandom.com/wiki/Special_Studies_Project
49.
Source: luforu.org
Title: Cutler-Twining memo
Link:https://luforu.org/cutler-twining-memo/
50.
Source: disclosdex.com
Title: Majestic 12 | Disclosdex
Link:https://disclosdex.com/organizations/majestic-12
51.
Source: govinfo.gov
Link:https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-211/USREPORTS-211-525/context
52.
Source: govinfo.gov
Link:https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USREPORTS-48/USREPORTS-48-729/context
Additional References
53.
Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dA69pv9AQx0
Source snippet
A secret history: Inside shadow intelligence, the MJ-12 documents | Reality Check...
54.
Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ogJplVuElLs
Source snippet
1 UFO Crash Retrieval Expert on CIA Alien Files & Majestic 12 | Ryan Wood...
55.
Source: ufomagazines.com
Title: UFO Magazine Archive Just Cause — Just Cause
Link:https://www.ufomagazines.com/just-cause-new-series-just-cause-1987-09-no-13-new-series/
Source snippet
UFO Magazine ArchiveJust Cause — Just Cause - New Series | UFO Magazine Archive...
56.
Source: youtube.com
Title: UFOs and MJ-12
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zHqIXLOqRak
Source snippet
"Cutler-Twining" MJ-12 Ep 020: A Full Reading of the MJ-12 Eisenhower Briefing Document...
57.
Source: youtube.com
Title: 1 UFO Crash Retrieval Expert on CIA Alien Files & Majestic 12 | Ryan Wood
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8JeoxrJ0mI4
Source snippet
UFOs and MJ-12 - Stanton Friedman LIVE - FEATURE LENGTH...
58.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Karl Pflock discusses The Cutler
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I6smHEhd9MI
Source snippet
The 1954 Top-Secret Intel Memo Exposing the Government's Most Guarded UAP Working Group...
59.
Source: fbi.gov
Link:https://www.fbi.gov/video-repository/inside-the-fbi-ufos-102921.mp4/view
60.
Source: govinfo.gov
Link:https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GOVPUB-C13-cada156143a2bea4cd95942bfb56ae5d
61.
Source: archives.fbi.gov
Link:https://archives.fbi.gov/archives/baltimore/press-releases/2011/twelfth-baltimore-police-officer-pleads-guilty-in-majestic-towing-company-extortion-scheme
62.
Source: cia.gov
Title: TOPIC S FOR DISCUSSION AT MEETING WITH BRANCH CHIEFS | CIA FOIA (foia.cia.gov)
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/cia-rdp70-00211r000300100019-6